Cars

[Impact]

Review, Discuss and Have Fun!

[Impact]

Great and fantastsic Pixar strikes again! Full of funny scenes. (This film had a great reaction when I saw it at the theaters). The only backslash I saw was on the net. Anyway great film.A+

[Fake]

Awesome movie! A must see for all kids.

A

[NolanVE]

9.9/10 One of my favorite pixar movies.

[Rudolf]

I have no problem with talking animals but cars.

[John Marston]

A One of my favorite PIXAR films

[Jack Nevada]

People give this movie shit but i still like it.4/5

[cookie]

Watching it as an eleven year-old kid I remember being kinda bored by it. Haven't seen it since.

[DAR]

Never been a favorite but it's cute. B

[John Marston]

this movie is just as good as other PIXAR movies

[luna]

i was bored to bits. couldn't make it the whole way through and that rusty car character was fucking annoying.

 

D

[RobinHood26]

I really really like this movie. Pixar doing its thing. 

 

B+

[CaptainJackSparrow]

A great Pixar film, great characters, and I love how Pixar portrayed the western setting.

[AniNate]

I'm finding it surprisingly difficult to write a review of this after watching it again. It's really tempting to dismiss this movie/franchise as "Pixar's cash-in", but it still possesses a sort of admirable audacity that makes it of a piece with the rest of the studio's body of work. 

 

It may be accurate to view Cars as Pixar's opportunity to get all their juvenile tendencies out of their system (which I would buy a lot more than the popular "They need them to fund their better movies" argument). They are undeniably the dumbest movies they've put out from every creative standpoint, but there is still a perverse sense of thought and care being put into that idiocy. This utterly nonsensical world they've created provides the best sandbox for presenting all their broadest jokes for the world to see. 

 

I will give Cars credit for trying to add dramatic weight in the second half. While it's impossible for me to get past the inherent absurdity of the whole universe, I do find the Lighting/Doc/Sally arc engaging enough. I suppose this was where Cars 1 succeeded and Cars 2 didn't

Edited September 27, 2015 by tribefan695

[DAR]

It did inspire the best (pre-Star Wars, pre-Avatar, pre-Toy Story) themed land at a Disney Park

[Goffe]

McQueen is too much of a bad stereotype and his character arc bored me to tears. Should have focused more on the decadent town aspect and its lovable residents, that's where the real heart of the movie was. 55/100

[angeldelmito]

90/100 (A-)

 

McQueen is a problematic little fucker in the beginning but as the movie proceeds, you learn to love him, the other characters, and Radiator Springs. And that credits sequence was brilliant with them spoofing the other Pixar movies. 

[MrFanaticGuy34]

The Cars-films are some of those Pixar that I defend to a certain extent.....and this first one is no exception.

 

The characters are enjoyable & memorable. Especially Lightning McQueen & Mater. I thought Paul Newman's voice performance as Doc Hudson is very genuine and strong....considering it was one of his last films before he died.

 

All in all.....a very pleasant Pixar-film.

 

A

Edited August 19, 2016 by MrFanaticGuy34

[a2k]

Under-rated Pixar movie critically. Commercially the multiplier makes perfect sense to me at 4.06x (244.1/60.1)

A

[cannastop]

Not overrated or underrated.

 

C.

 

Also, why the fuck is this movie almost 2 hours long?