Jump to content

Jay Beezy

Opinions on the MPAA rating system

Recommended Posts

There's a really nice documentary about the MPAA, it's called This Film Is Not Yet Rated. It shows a number of directors who had a really hard time cutting scenes from their movies in order to get a R rating, because a NC-17 just kills your marketing opportunities and most cinema chains won't even show it. There are other issues discussed in the movie: The MPAA members are anonymous, sometimes members of the church help deciding the ratings, gay sex scenes and female sexual depictions usually get higher ratings... Even Blue Valentine almost got a NC-17. And this part (Careful, NSFW http://youtu.be/ZT5l_mGIcTA?t=26s)of the movie shows different ratings given to movies with gay sex scenes.

 

Also, the Fuck rule is retarded.

 

The irony of the Blue Valentine situation was that Black Swan had a similar scene, which was between two girls no less, and it got away with an R rating just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites











I wish the MPAA could be changed. A rule I hate is you can be violent in a PG-13 all you want but if do not show blood then it gets a PG-13 rating. 

 

Yeah, I don't get that. People bleed, get over it, the rating should be decided based on how violent the movie is, not on the amount of blood showed. I guess they do that because they think not showing blood make the movie supposedly less brutal for kids and young teens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Yeah, I don't get that. People bleed, get over it, the rating should be decided based on how violent the movie is, not on the amount of blood showed. I guess they do that because they think not showing blood make the movie supposedly less brutal for kids and young teens?

 

Honestly, I'll defend the MPAA on that one. Violence does tend to be more disturbing if you see the bodily fluids expelled as a result. They're still ridiculously behind the times as far as their stances on sex and language go, though.

Edited by tribefan695
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I'll defend the MPAA on that one. Violence does tend to be more disturbing if you see the bodily fluids expelled as a result. They're still ridiculously behind the times as far as their stances on sex and language go, though.

 

Fluids and organs. It's disturbing for me to see eye-gougings and emasculations.

 

There ought to be a distinction between genuine passionate sensual lovemaking, hetero- and homo- alike, and the hard dirty sex of something like Shame.

Edited by Jay Beezy
Link to comment
Share on other sites



While I don't want to say UK all the way, I believe our rating system is far more level headed than the US. Show a load of tits? 15 year olds can go. Shout fuck 300 times and say C you next tuesday once? 15 year olds can go. Only stuff that gets 18 ratings here are stuff like Saw, Evil Dead and Shame when they go extreme with sex and gore. And they still show them in mainstream cinemas.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



While I don't want to say UK all the way, I believe our rating system is far more level headed than the US. Show a load of tits? 15 year olds can go. Shout fuck 300 times and say C you next tuesday once? 15 year olds can go. Only stuff that gets 18 ratings here are stuff like Saw, Evil Dead and Shame when they go extreme with sex and gore. And they still show them in mainstream cinemas.

They probably represent what the average American parent really thinks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



The internet has the real kind with real people killed in wars with their body torn in half etc. the stuff you see in films is nothing.

 

Yeah, but I highly doubt people go on the internet to look up that kind of shit like the way horny teenagers look up porn. I definitely think the MPAA should be more relaxed on sex/nudity in films since its nothing anyone who has hit puberty hasn't already seen... especially since porn is real fucking.

Edited by Shpongle
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Yeah, but I highly doubt people go on the internet to look up that kind of shit like the way horny teenagers look up porn. I definitely think the MPAA should be more relaxed on sex/nudity in films since its nothing anyone who has hit puberty hasn't already seen... especially since porn is real fucking.

 

An R-rated movie could show a sex scene with nudity, sans actual penetration, that represents genuine lovemaking, something parents could show their underage teen kids what sex should be like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





After reading this thread, I'm more worried that if the MPAA ever thought about this issue, they'd try to make it harder to have violent movies, as opposed to relaxing their attitudes towards sex in movies. I don't really need to see sex in movies, since I'm an adult male who can watch porn when he pleases. However, I do want to see violence in movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.