Lost City of Z | Brad Pitt producing | Robert Pattinson, Sienna Miller. Charlie Hunnam replaces Benedict Cumberbatch.

[grim22]

On 9/8/2016 at 5:12 PM, Jake Gittes said:

Bleecker Street is gonna put this out in Spring 2017.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/charlie-hunnam-drama-lost-city-926731

 

 

 

 

[The Stingray]

Glowing reviews so far. Really looking forward to this!

[The Stingray]

it was actually shot by Darius Khondji, and it’s his most beautiful work to date 
 

http://www.indiewire.com/2016/10/the-lost-city-of-z-review-robert-pattinson-james-gray-nyff-2016-1201737045/

[Kalo]

So it's tone is like a 1970s adventure? Apocalypse Now maybe?  this sounds AMAZING! but why push it back to spring 2017? not Oscar material? that doesn't necessarily mean it won't be great, but it does make me slightly skeptical. 

[filmlover]

34 minutes ago, Kalo said:

So it's tone is like a 1970s adventure? Apocalypse Now maybe?  this sounds AMAZING! but why push it back to spring 2017? not Oscar material? that doesn't necessarily mean it won't be great, but it does make me slightly skeptical. 

Probably they don't see it as an Oscar player.

[Jake Gittes]

This will have more room to breathe outside of a packed Oscar season, and if it's good/acclaimed enough for awards they can push it at the end of next year anyway.

Edited October 17, 2016 by Jake Gittes

[The Futurist]

James Gray still thinks we re in 1976, oh well, good for him I guess.

 

 

[Gokira2012]

$2,500,000 OW

 

$11,000,000 DOM

 

$25,000,000 WW

[The Stingray]

4 hours ago, The Futurist said:

James Gray still thinks we re in 1976, oh well, good for him I guess.

 

 

 

Good for me too. The '70s were like the best decade for movies.
 

[Fancyarcher]

 

[filmlover]

This looks amazing.

[CoolioD1]

can charlie hunnam be good in anything? as soon as i hear him talk i'm like "jesus christ no..." he could tell me what time it is and i wouldn't believe him he can't deliver any line ever convincingly. 

[Jake Gittes]

Gray has always gotten top-notch work out of his actors so I'm optimistic. The reviews I've seen say he does well in this too.

[TimmyRiggins]

2 hours ago, CoolioD1 said:

can charlie hunnam be good in anything? as soon as i hear him talk i'm like "jesus christ no..." he could tell me what time it is and i wouldn't believe him he can't deliver any line ever convincingly. 

 

His performance has been extremely praised in all the reviews I've seen. And he's great in Sons Of Anarchy, don't know what to tell you. 

[CoolioD1]

3 minutes ago, TimmyRiggins said:

 

His performance has been extremely praised in all the reviews I've seen. And he's great in Sons Of Anarchy, don't know what to tell you. 

he's bad on that show which is also the worst. 

Edited December 22, 2016 by CoolioD1

[Jake Gittes]

This was a year in which Luke Evans, Jai Courtney, Sam Worthington and Luke Bracey all gave surprisingly good and memorable performances in stuff so with any luck Hunnam should follow. Just goes to further show that all these guys aren't inherently bad actors they all just depend heavily on material and direction. Truly hopeless performers like say Taylor Lautner simply don't stick around for long, they aren't able to. 

[CoolioD1]

eh, i'm more indifferent to those actors (though evans i've thought has been pretty good in the past). hunnam just doesn't jive with me i guess i'm just gonna avoid films he has the lead in ever since pacific rim. smaller roles like crimson peak are i guess bearable enough that i can ignore him because i like the rest of that movie so much.

[BadAtGender]

Oh, this isn't the sequel to World War Z.

[MovieMan89]

12 minutes ago, DamienRoc said:

Oh, this isn't the sequel to World War Z.

Right? Was just gonna come in here and comment what a ridiculous title that was for the sequel. 

[Napoleon]

28 minutes ago, Jake Gittes said:

This was a year in which Luke Evans, Jai Courtney, Sam Worthington and Luke Bracey all gave surprisingly good and memorable performances in stuff so with any luck Hunnam should follow. Just goes to further show that all these guys aren't inherently bad actors they all just depend heavily on material and direction. Truly hopeless performers like say Taylor Lautner simply don't stick around for long, they aren't able to. 

Hopefully the next one that will shock us by proving to not be a bad actor will be Chris Evans.