Lost City of Z | Brad Pitt producing | Robert Pattinson, Sienna Miller. Charlie Hunnam replaces Benedict Cumberbatch.

[DeeCee]

18 minutes ago, DamienRoc said:

Oh, this isn't the sequel to World War Z.

 

5 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

Right? Was just gonna come in here and comment what a ridiculous title that was for the sequel. 

Of course not. It's the prequel. Who do you think lives in the Lost City of Z?

[Alli]

Charlie Hunman is eye candy   Even though the movie was bad, he was adequate in Crimson Peak

[filmlover]

38 minutes ago, Jake Gittes said:

This was a year in which Luke Evans, Jai Courtney, Sam Worthington and Luke Bracey all gave surprisingly good and memorable performances in stuff so with any luck Hunnam should follow. Just goes to further show that all these guys aren't inherently bad actors they all just depend heavily on material and direction. Truly hopeless performers like say Taylor Lautner simply don't stick around for long, they aren't able to. 

Luke Evans is actually a really good actor, he just gets saddled with mostly lousy roles (although he's perfect for Gaston).

[Jake Gittes]

47 minutes ago, Napoleon said:

Hopefully the next one that will shock us by proving to not be a bad actor will be Chris Evans.

 

 

[Plain Old Tele]

5 hours ago, Jake Gittes said:

 

 

 

Missed the opportunity for a SUNSHINE clip.  

[Jake Gittes]

3 hours ago, Grand Moff Tele said:

 

Missed the opportunity for a SUNSHINE clip.  

 

I haven't seen that movie since it came out 

[ddddeeee]

13 hours ago, Alli said:

Charlie Hunman is eye candy   Even though the movie was bad, he was adequate in Crimson Peak

Crimson Peak is fantastic and Hunnam is the weakest part of it.

[lilmac]

Never thought I'd see the day that Charlie Hunnam gets critical acclaim for a performance.

 

 

 

 

He was decent in Pacific Rim.

[filmlover]

This is selling really well at the Arclight in LA and Lowes Lincoln Square in NYC for tonight and tomorrow. $40K+ PTA could be in store for the weekend.

[The Futurist]

Pattinson is such a dreadful actor I have no idea why "auteurs" still find it "cute" to cast him.

These guys have really low standards.

 

As usual, he was laughable in this.

Edited April 14, 2017 by The Futurist

[marveldcfox]

7 hours ago, The Futurist said:

Pattinson is such a dreadful actor I have no idea why "auteurs" still find it "cute" to cast him.

These guys have really low standards.

 

As usual, he was laughable in this.

Those auteurs have a thing for people like Pattinson. 

[LateReg]

13 hours ago, The Futurist said:

Pattinson is such a dreadful actor I have no idea why "auteurs" still find it "cute" to cast him.

These guys have really low standards.

 

As usual, he was laughable in this.

He's great in a small role in The Childhood of a Leader.

[Viceversa]

thought he was good in The Rover

[Viceversa]

Was surprised by this film i expected something more modern. The casting was pretty good, Charlie was very strong. First half is a little bit muddied in pacing and writing but picks up and finishes nicely.

 

I found this film to be very similar to Reds (1981).

Edited April 16, 2017 by Viceversa

[Blankments]

This is really good; Hunnam surprisingly is the best aspect of it

[HesAPooka]

On 2017-04-14 at 5:36 AM, The Futurist said:

Pattinson is such a dreadful actor I have no idea why "auteurs" still find it "cute" to cast him.

These guys have really low standards.

 

As usual, he was laughable in this.

 

Have to agree, he doesn't seem to understand that when he's playing a character he should try to make them likeable as well as believable. He was so annoying in The Rover, and meh in this.

 

Have to say this movie was a let down for me. Don't understand the praise for this movie by critics. Nothing about it stood out for me. Was an overwhelmingly okay 6/10.

[Barnack]

Had to check, didn't recognize that it was Pattinson in the movie (well the only movie of is I saw him was one of the Potter and the Rover)

[Jake Gittes]

29 minutes ago, HesAPooka said:

 

 when he's playing a character he should try to make them likeable as well as believable.

 

Since when should anyone do that?

[HesAPooka]

1 hour ago, Jake Gittes said:

 

Since when should anyone do that?

 

Since always. The industry is full of good actors that aren't likeable and they fade away with time because of it.

Edited July 14, 2017 by HesAPooka