Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice | 532m overseas | 851m Worldwide

[efialtes76]

17 minutes ago, leatherjacket said:

Yeah fanboys were talking about 2B in the pocket for this movie. Now, 800M is a very nice. 800M for BvS is like a 50M for an average 45M budget movie.

Who?

And you talking about fanboys...

[Olive]

21 minutes ago, efialtes76 said:

 

Like IM,IM2,Thor 1 and 2,GotG,TASM 1 and 2,CA,CA:WS,Ant Man,MoS,BB,IH...

Those don't have 3 big superhero icons, and none of them cost $250M to made.

20 minutes ago, Mockingjay Raphael said:

 

3 years of inflation, the BIG  growth of the Chinese market, being a sequel to the 'biggest and most loved SH movie of the history' and Avengers 2 couldn't even match the first movie.... What an achievement! 

Yeah, only 500M more than BS.Failure.

Edited April 15, 2016 by Olive

[Finnick]

37 minutes ago, efialtes76 said:

Who?

And you talking about fanboys...

At http://www.comicbookmovie.com/, the hard DC fanboys have been bragging about BvS hitting 2B mark, since the first trailer.

[Thrylos 7]

46 minutes ago, Mockingjay Raphael said:

 

3 years of inflation, the BIG  growth of the Chinese market, being a sequel to the 'biggest and most loved SH movie of the history' and Avengers 2 couldn't even match the first movie.... What an achievement! 

Don't worry civil war will more than make up for the "failure" of AOU . BvS , on the other hand, is a flop in everything, bo, critics reviews, GA reaction (hence the horrible legs) e.t.c .

[Finnick]

1 hour ago, efialtes76 said:

Who?

And you talking about fanboys...

By the way if you mean I am a fan boy, I am not. The first SH movie that I liked is Batman Begins, I watched The Dark knight more than a dozen times, and he is by far my favorite SH movie. It is true I am now attracted to the MCU. But I just want to enjoy good movies. I was really amazed by Deadpool and Daysoffuturepast even they are not a MCU movies. My point is that BvS, have a huge opportunity to be the biggest SH movie of all time and he just screwed that up HUGELY.

[Ent]

Quote

DC Entertainment’s Batman v Superman: Dawn Of Justicemeanwhile has climbed to $500m through Warner Bros Pictures International and $801.2m worldwide.

 

http://www.screendaily.com/box-office/the-jungle-book-set-to-soar-internationally/5102639.article?blocktitle=LATEST-INTERNATIONAL-BOX-OFFICE-NEWS&contentID=40071

[mredman]

8 hours ago, Thrylos 7 said:

Don't worry civil war will more than make up for the "failure" of AOU . BvS , on the other hand, is a flop in everything, bo, critics reviews, GA reaction (hence the horrible legs) e.t.c .

[cannastop]

On 3/21/2016 at 3:04 AM, MinaTakla said:

If this doesn't make 1 B WW and ZOOTOPIA does..

it will be the most insane surprise in memory!

Am rooting for both though and BvS moreso because I love Batman

Just digging this back up.

[Ent]

BvS did decent when taken out of context.

 

When comparing to the last Batman movie, the foreign results are objectivelly a poor results.  

 

With inflation, 3D and markets expansion, you usually at least match or nearly match the last movie foreign gross with the same character, even rebooted.

 

TASM for example, did $550M on the foreign soil, which is basicly what Spiderman3 did.  So if not with admission, at least in terms of global gross, it didn't lose that much on the foreign soil right after Spiderman3, exploiting the 3D and inflation price to do so.

 

This is the exact same situation, a new actor playing a beloved character in a rebooted movie that added 3D and some years of inflation and extended markets that compensate the lower exchange rate.

 

In that situation you have TDKR that did $644M on the foreign market in 2012 and will have Bat V Supes that will end up with probably $100M less in a market that usually guarantee at least the same level of revenues as some markets expand more to compensate the lower revenues elsewhere.

 

It's not dramatic but it's clearly show that the non Nolan Batman hasn' retained as much as it should have from the popularity Nolan's Batman had abroad, which is traditionally the market that is usually the lesser impacted by decrease because of the expansion of some.

 

Even MOS foreign take did outgross Superman Returns foreign one.

 

A situation where the foreign market doesn't render at least as much or in the vicinity of the previous movie, even with a new actor playing the lead,  is a troubling situation as those tentpoles more and more lean on the foreign markets revenues to make up for the natural decline in the domestic one. 

 

That's why plenty of tentpoles like Pirates and Transformers are still on.  They keep on increasing on the foreign soil thanks to expanding markets that compensate the poor exchange rates and the decline observed in the western markets, domestic one included.

Edited April 16, 2016 by Ent

[TimmyRiggins]

No, the context is BvS having poor word of mouth and bad bad reviews, in that context, it's doing fine. Now, if it had great reviews and great WOM, it would be poor. 

[efialtes76]

8 hours ago, Ent said:

BvS did decent when taken out of context.

 

When comparing to the last Batman movie, the foreign results are objectivelly a poor results.  

 

With inflation, 3D and markets expansion, you usually at least match or nearly match the last movie foreign gross with the same character, even rebooted.

 

TASM for example, did $550M on the foreign soil, which is basicly what Spiderman3 did.  So if not with admission, at least in terms of global gross, it didn't lose that much on the foreign soil right after Spiderman3, exploiting the 3D and inflation price to do so.

 

This is the exact same situation, a new actor playing a beloved character in a rebooted movie that added 3D and some years of inflation and extended markets that compensate the lower exchange rate.

 

In that situation you have TDKR that did $644M on the foreign market in 2012 and will have Bat V Supes that will end up with probably $100M less in a market that usually guarantee at least the same level of revenues as some markets expand more to compensate the lower revenues elsewhere.

 

It's not dramatic but it's clearly show that the non Nolan Batman hasn' retained as much as it should have from the popularity Nolan's Batman had abroad, which is traditionally the market that is usually the lesser impacted by decrease because of the expansion of some.

 

Even MOS foreign take did outgross Superman Returns foreign one.

 

A situation where the foreign market doesn't render at least as much or in the vicinity of the previous movie, even with a new actor playing the lead,  is a troubling situation as those tentpoles more and more lean on the foreign markets revenues to make up for the natural decline in the domestic one. 

 

That's why plenty of tentpoles like Pirates and Transformers are still on.  They keep on increasing on the foreign soil thanks to expanding markets that compensate the poor exchange rates and the decline observed in the western markets, domestic one included.

Yep but exchange rates are worse than 2012:

 

                                  Summer 2012:                                              March 2015:

 

 

Argentina:               (US $1 = 4.57036 Argentine Peso)                      (US $1 = 14.509 Argentine Peso) 

               

 Australia:              (US $1 = 0.96348 Australian Dollar)                      (US $1 = 1.3311 Australian Dollar)         

 

 

Brazil:                   (US $1 = 2.02211 Brazilian Real)                          (US $1 = 3.68255 Brazilian Real) 

 

Chile:                     (US $1 = 482.35 Chilean Peso)                             (US $1 = 670.77 Chilean Peso) 

 

Colombia:               (US $1 = 1788 Colombian Peso)                             (US $1 = 3071 Colombian Peso) 

                                                           

Europe:                  (US $1 = 0.81152 Euro)                                       (US $1 = 0.87745 Euro) 

 

Japan:                     (US $1 = 78.41 Yen)                                           (US $1 = 113.04 Yen)     

 

Mexico:                   (US $1 = 13.2282 Mexican Peso)                          (US $1 = 17.5223 Mexican Peso)   

 

Russia:                   (US $1 = 32.0017 Russian Rouble)                        (US $1 = 67.947 Russian Rouble) 

 

UK:                        (US $1 = 0.64004 British Pound Sterling)                (US $1 = 0.70731 British Pound Sterling)   

 

Edited April 16, 2016 by efialtes76

[Quigley]

On 15/4/2016 at 3:22 PM, efialtes76 said:

 

Like IM,IM2,Thor 1 and 2,GotG,TASM 1 and 2,CA,CA:WS,Ant Man,MoS,BB,IH...

 

The fact that DC fans are comparing Batman AND Superman with Iron Man, Thor, GotG, Ant Man and Captain America shows how "low" they have to go to make a rational (and favorable) comparison.

[Mockingjay Raphael]

4 hours ago, TimmyRiggins said:

No, the context is BvS having poor word of mouth and bad bad reviews, in that context, it's doing fine. Now, if it had great reviews and great WOM, it would be poor. 

 

No, the movie receiving bad reviews/WOM is not an excuse for these numbers, from the 24 movies that made $1B WW, 7 movies received bad/terrible reviews, a movie that has the two biggest heroes of planet should easily be surpassing this mark as well, the performance of this movie is a shame, the bad reviews and WOM is just a bonus.

[efialtes76]

58 minutes ago, Quigley said:

 

The fact that DC fans are comparing Batman AND Superman with Iron Man, Thor, GotG, Ant Man and Captain America shows how "low" they have to go to make a rational (and favorable) comparison.

I love DC,Marvel(Disney and No Disney films),Dark Horse(Hellboy,300,Sin City)Kick-Ass....

Edited April 16, 2016 by efialtes76

[efialtes76]

56 minutes ago, Mockingjay Raphael said:

 

No, the movie receiving bad reviews/WOM is not an excuse for these numbers, from the 24 movies that made $1B WW, 7 movies received bad/terrible reviews, a movie that has the two biggest heroes of planet should easily be surpassing this mark as well, the performance of this movie is a shame, the bad reviews and WOM is just a bonus.

The Media has been much more agressive with BvS than with any of those movies.

[Olive]

Domestic:	$311,311,730	37.6%
+ Foreign:	$516,000,000	62.4%
= Worldwide:	$827,311,730

[Purple Minion]

@giteshoandya Intl wknd on #BatmanvSuperman falls 56% to $15.1M. China at $95M, intl cume $516M. Global now $827.3M going to about $875M final.

[efialtes76]

12 minutes ago, Purple Minion said:

@giteshoandya Intl wknd on #BatmanvSuperman falls 56% to $15.1M. China at $95M, intl cume $516M. Global now $827.3M going to about $875M final.

Maybe $850m-$855m.

Edited April 17, 2016 by efialtes76

[TalismanRing]

1	Avatar	Fox	$2,788.0	$760.5	27.3%	$2,027.5	72.7%	2009^
2	Titanic	Par.	$2,186.8	$658.7	30.1%	$1,528.1	69.9%	1997^
3	Star Wars: The Force Awakens	BV	$2,065.3	$935.6	45.3%	$1,129.7	54.7%	2015
4	Jurassic World	Uni.	$1,670.4	$652.3	39.0%	$1,018.1	61.0%	2015
5	Marvel's The Avengers	BV	$1,519.6	$623.4	41.0%	$896.2	59.0%	2012
6	Furious 7	Uni.	$1,516.0	$353.0	23.3%	$1,163.0	76.7%	2015
7	Avengers: Age of Ultron	BV	$1,405.4	$459.0	32.7%	$946.4	67.3%	2015
8	Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2	WB	$1,341.5	$381.0	28.4%	$960.5	71.6%	2011
9	Frozen	BV	$1,276.5	$400.7	31.4%	$875.7	68.6%	2013
10	Iron Man 3	BV	$1,215.4	$409.0	33.7%	$806.4	66.3%	2013
11	Minions	Uni.	$1,159.4	$336.0	29.0%	$823.4	71.0%	2015
12	Transformers: Dark of the Moon	P/DW	$1,123.8	$352.4	31.4%	$771.4	68.6%	2011
13	The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King	NL	$1,119.9	$377.8	33.7%	$742.1	66.3%	2003^
14	Skyfall	Sony	$1,108.6	$304.4	27.5%	$804.2	72.5%	2012
15	Transformers: Age of Extinction	Par.	$1,104.1	$245.4	22.2%	$858.6	77.8%	2014
16	The Dark Knight Rises	WB	$1,084.9	$448.1	41.3%	$636.8	58.7%	2012
17	Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest	BV	$1,066.2	$423.3	39.7%	$642.9	60.3%	2006
18	Toy Story 3	BV	$1,063.2	$415.0	39.0%	$648.2	61.0%	2010
19	Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides	BV	$1,045.7	$241.1	23.1%	$804.6	76.9%	2011
20	Jurassic Park	Uni.	$1,029.2	$402.5	39.1%	$626.7	60.9%	1993^
21	Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace	Fox	$1,027.0	$474.5	46.2%	$552.5	53.8%	1999^
22	Alice in Wonderland (2010)	BV	$1,025.5	$334.2	32.6%	$691.3	67.4%	2010
23	The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey	WB (NL)	$1,021.1	$303.0	29.7%	$718.1	70.3%	2012
24	The Dark Knight	WB	$1,004.6	$534.9	53.2%	$469.7	46.8%	2008^

 

The $1b +  movies with reviews with critical reaction near as bad as BvS are the the couple of Transformers movies and the last Pirates. Other "rotten" movies had more mixed reception int the high 40s and 50s on RT. Both the Transformers and Pirates have found poor critical reception eventually greatly diminish their domestic box office. Both had very much loved first films and both series are more light hearted with lots of big action set pieces.    Even those with "mixed" reviews had the leg up of being sequels to extremely popular franchises (Minions and Menace) and Alice benefited off of Depp's then huge popularity and the 3D craze.

 

Interestingly, every film in the top 10 is 75%+ on RT.  And 16 of the 24 as well.

[Omni]

Godzilla 2.0

 

How IM3 managed such a high score is beyond me, but then again critics appear to be very easy to please when it comes to superhero films. Same with most animated films.