Jump to content

Eric S'ennui

The Batman | March 4, 2022 | Warner Bros. | Certified Fresh on RT | 7th Most Profitable Movie of 2023

Recommended Posts



8 minutes ago, BestPicturePlutoNash said:

Justice League is one of the worst movies ever made and still did 90+

It had all the big DC Superheroes together for the first time on the big screen and couldn't even get past $100 million OW.

 

The Batman is just one of those superheroes coming off two bad films in a row, so it stands to reason that this would suggest a sub $100 million OW. If it manages to over perform and either hit or go over $100 million OW then that's a success.

Edited by Caesar
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Moderation

 

Please do not mention leaked information/spoilers out in the open. This is supposed to be a spoiler-free forum.

 

I will also say that maybe it's time for you guys to take a break between arguing how big or small the opening will be. It's clear all parties will not change their minds here and the arguments are starting to go on for too long.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



25 minutes ago, Caesar said:

It had all the big DC Superheroes together for the first time on the big screen and couldn't even get past $100 million OW.

 

The Batman is just one of those superheroes coming off two bad films in a row, so it stands to reason that this would suggest a sub $100 million OW. If it manages to over perform and either hit or go over $100 million OW then that's a success.

 

JL floped because of many reasons and none of them was Batman. Joker did great and was just 3 years after Jared Leto in Suicide Squad << people knew it's something new without any connection to the "DCEU". The same happens with the new Batman. If You want to compare The Batman with BvS and JL than You should consider one thing - the hype for The Batman is bigger than for any of 'em.

 

People underestimate / underpredicted TDK in 2007-2008. Don't be like those folks, don't underestimate another Batman, cause...

40G0.gif

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



10 minutes ago, BruiseCruise said:

suicide squad was hated by critics, fans clearly like it since it not only had a strong opening but really good legs

 

bvs was not liked by both and same with jL

 

 

 

SS-2.48x

JL-2.44x 

Both movies were equally hated/loved.

 

 

Edited by efialtes76
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





3 minutes ago, Menor Reborn said:

The hype for Batman is not bigger than BvS, that had crossover hook. It had 29m previews which this one isn't gonna match even with the early screenings.

BvS had 27.7M  i mean BvS isn't even the biggest preview for a batman movie tdkr had 30.6m

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites







Both BVS and SS opening weekends were lower than they should have been due to WOM. BVS $82m opening day is normally indicative of a near $200m weekend. SS $65m opening day is normally indicative of $150m+, etc. The floor for that wave of DC hero origins was CLEARLY higher than the floor for Marvels first wave of heroes , DC just bungled them horribly.

 

MOS definitely was hyped, but it was also far from what it could have done. It had a veteran cast but no trendy star. It had action, but Snyder's gray, grainy look was far less appealing than the marvel/Michael Bay colorful look. Yes, it was more marketable than the atrociously unmarketable retro-gloomy vibe of SUPERMAN RETURNS, but it was hardly what it could have been. Giving Cavill the ghost-pale skin tone and awkward haircut was a huge marketing miss.

 

One thing Marvel deserves credit for - they remember these things exist primarily to make money and need to presented in a highly commercial fashion as a result. Starting with Avi Arad and 2002's Spider-man and continuing - they understood the need to sell and release the films properly.  DC really missed the boat there by letting their director try and make "art". WB went full commercial this with BATMAN in 1989 and tried to do it with SUPERMAN in the early 2000s but couldn't get it off the ground.

 

2022's BLACK ADAM might be the closest WB gets to this and looks ripe to breakout big time. 

Edited by excel1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, excel1 said:

One thing Marvel deserves credit for - they remember these things exist primarily to make money and need to presented in a highly commercial fashion as a result. Starting with Avi Arad and 2002's Spider-man and continuing - they understood the need to sell and release the films properly.  DC really missed the boat there by letting their director try and make "art".

giphy.gif?cid=790b7611ac4545976919eba47c

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites







Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.