John Marston Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 When you take into account how the OS market is known to behave, it's not excellent, just ok. For films performing at this level sequels have been known to have similar or bigger increases than STID: RE3: 97M RE4: 236M Taken: 82M Taken 2: 236M An example of an excellent OS increase would be from Batman Begins 167M to TDK 470M, but STID increase was less than any of these so I wouldn't call it excellent. this is what makes the gross not that impressive. Hell a movie like National Treasure 2 had a bigger increase over the first worldwide without even adding something like 3D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 this is what makes the gross not that impressive. Hell a movie like National Treasure 2 had a bigger increase over the first worldwide without even adding something like 3D. Yet they say Cage is poison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 .Star Trek Into Darkness stands at $225.3m and opens in Argentina and Chile on Aug 15 followed by Japan on Aug 23. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 I don't get why Paramount or WB don't push for a mid-August releases for STID and MOS? Well, at least STID seems to be in a better position than MOS. It'll most likely make less than MOS, but it sure has a better release date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
druv10 Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 BoxOffice @BoxOffice2m STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS: $231.3M Overseas Total / $458.6M Global Total. #StarTrekIntoDarkness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 poor performace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Hunting Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Pretty solid perfomace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 230M OS for a $200M budgetd sci-fi action sequel ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Even GIJ2 did more, in Spring ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moviedweeb Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Despite the numbers not being great, this is a huge long term win. Paramount now has another premiere franchise and the sequel will make much more OS. In terms of merchandise, licensing, bluray/on demand/digital etc..., ST is a cash cow. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 230M OS for a $200M budgetd sci-fi action sequel ... Its a good result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efialtes76 Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Even GIJ2 did more, in Spring ... and? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 and? And ? GIJ2, also from Par., cheaper and lamer and dumbed, did more this overhyped Trek sequel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted August 25, 2013 Author Share Posted August 25, 2013 firedeep, sometimes you are ridiculous... your coments make no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 And ? GIJ2, also from Par., cheaper and lamer and dumbed, did more this overhyped Trek sequel. So? People are stupid. What's your point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Point: STID didnt do well OS. Should have do much better. at least 300m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Yes, it should have but unfortunately it didn't. It is still the biggest Trek ever worldwide, for what's it's worth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Point: STID didnt do well OS. Should have do much better. at least 300m. Because? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 firedeep, sometimes you are ridiculous... your coments make no sense. Sometimes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Because 300M-plus is considered good for a $200M budgeted sci-fi action sequel. At same scales, both nonsequle PR and WWZ did it. Paramount marketed the shit out of it. They even did a one-month-long World Tour to promote it. Same group of people still dont want to accept the fact STID is big disappointment both DOM and OS. They over hyped the shit out of it. And now they celebrate it as if it were a huge achivement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
