#ED Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 So I guess everyone's 500M + OS predictions have shattered into pieces. Man of Steel WW Predictions in BSG: Man of Steel (47/47) Filmovie - $805M Neo - $801M 24Lost - $790M junkshop38 - $785M kayumanggi - $780M glassfairy - $771M CEDAR - $752M Mattrek - $750M c00k13 - $735M Jay Salahi - $734M druv10 - $725M JackO - $725M Telemachos - $722M grim22 - $720M iTz ED - $705M Schumacher FTW - $700M Vanilla - $700M kitik - $700M Sam - $690M iceroll - $685M TylerDurden365 - $675M Goffe - $675M Jake Gittes - $670M Punishment - $670M Tower - $650M RichWS - $650M baumer - $640M Simionski - $630M Newbie - $615M cmasterclay - $610M Iron Olive - $605M ShawnMR - $601M acsc1312 - $600M chasmmi - $595M gizmo - $595M DAR - $575M IronMan89 - $570M ChFloppit - $555M Blankments Into Darkness - $545m Michael G Scott - $525M The Stingray - $525M Fake - $525M CJohn - $505M Dexter of Suburbia - $500M narniadis - $450M TLK - $440M laguy03 - $435M CURRENT TOTAL - $398.4M 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 MoS > TASM at the BOTASM was coming off a trilpgy that averaged between 780m-890m worldwide. MoS is coming off a film that dis 391m. Trust me, MoS is more impressive. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Empire Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Really hope MU keeps on putting up great numbers! It needs to keep performing similar to TS3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efialtes76 Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Raimi SpidermanSpiderman - 821 million ww (without 3d)Spiderman 2 - 783 million ww (without 3d)Spiderman 3 - 890 million ww (with 3d)Webb spider-manTASM - 752 million ww (with 3d)For a reboot TASM was successful but compared to its previous iteration its lower Spiderman 3 with 3d? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordmandeep Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Wwz and mu looking towards 180+ and 280+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#ED Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Spiderman 3 with 3d? I think it was just IMAX. I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 MoS > TASM at the BOTASM was coming off a trilpgy that averaged between 780m-890m worldwide. MoS is coming off a film that dis 391m. Trust me, MoS is more impressive. TASM didn't spend not NEARLY as much as MoS to promote the film. TASM will end up keeping the 1st spot as most successful reboot. Spin the way you want to, but TASM is far more impressive than MoS, if anything because those who tried to spin TASM spin as bad or forgettable last year are doing their best to spin MoS numbers as something that looks great, when you can't have your cake and eat it too. Both are impressivel runs, but it seems that regardless Warner efforts, TASM will be keeping the 1st spot as the highest grossing reboot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickfox Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 TASM didn't spend not NEARLY as much as MoS to promote the film. TASM will end up keeping the 1st spot as most successful reboot. Spin the way you want to, but TASM is far more impressive than MoS, if anything because those who tried to spin TASM spin as bad or forgettable last year are doing their best to spin MoS numbers as something that looks great, when you can't have your cake and eat it too. Both are impressivel runs, but it seems that regardless Warner efforts, TASM will be keeping the 1st spot as the highest grossing reboot. no，it is not 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 26, 2013 Author Share Posted June 26, 2013 Those of us spinning ASM as bad and forgettable are talking about the movie itself not the box office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmnerdjamie Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 no，it is not Can't talk reason to crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 no，it is not I actually agree with you. Both are actually pretty even box office runs, but stupid flame wars sometimes take the best out of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Those of us spinning ASM as bad and forgettable are talking about the movie itself not the box office. I haven't watch MoS yet, but I find it hard to believe that general audience prefer MoS over TASM. At the end of the day, the box office is speaking by itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChD Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I haven't watch MoS yet, but I find it hard to believe that general audience prefer MoS over TASM. At the end of the day, the box office is speaking by itself. It is speaking by itself. Man of Steel comes of Superman returns, which did 391M and had bad reviews, and still manages to make nearly, or overtaking, The Amazing Spider-Man which comes from a trilogy that had all three movies over 750M WW and 330M DOM. It is speaking by itself indeed. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
druv10 Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 (edited) Not this shit again. Can we move on and talk about how impressive the MU and WWZ numbers are. What a tremendous run NYSM's having. This daily nonsense about MOS's getting old. Edited June 26, 2013 by druv10 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmnerdjamie Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 As a stand alone film (independent from the Spider-Man brand-name) and given the history of how reboots perform, Amazing Spider-Man's gross is great. As a Spider-Man film (given its brand-name and performances of the earlier versions) and against its projections/expectations, Amazing Spider-Man's gross is a disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 As a stand alone film (independent from the Spider-Man brand-name) and given the history of how reboots perform, Amazing Spider-Man's gross is great.As a Spider-Man film (given its brand-name and performances of the earlier versions) and against its projections/expectations, Amazing Spider-Man's gross is a disappointment.Weren't there some thinking it wouldn't even make 200m? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChD Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Not this shit again. Can we move on and talk about how impressive the MU and WWZ numbers are. What a tremendous run NYSM's having. This daily nonsense about MOS's getting old. Yeah... Like WWZ and MU didn't have a 250 pages thread in which people talked about their numbers. That discussion isn't getting old.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#ED Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Yeah... Like WWZ and MU didn't have a 250 pages thread in which people talked about their numbers. That discussion isn't getting old.. I'm pretty sure it was 200 pages of MoS doing shit numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 As a stand alone film (independent from the Spider-Man brand-name) and given the history of how reboots perform, Amazing Spider-Man's gross is great. As a Spider-Man film (given its brand-name and performances of the earlier versions) and against its projections/expectations, Amazing Spider-Man's gross is a disappointment. That's a good spin. It's the same of saying that looking to Man of Steel box office numbers as a reboot, it's gross is good, but looking at the all the money and marketing involved, it's a disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChD Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I'm pretty sure it was 200 pages of MoS doing shit numbers. They had their chances then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
