No Time To Die | October 8 2021 | 82% on RT | RIP Sean Connery

[Valonqar]

53 minutes ago, Thrylos 7 said:

Meh, is still can’t figure out where the Craig era went to shit. It started with a bang with casino royal promising a return to glory days and then we got disappointment after disappointment with spectre being the last straw , where they basically ruined the big return of spectre and blofeld to the franchise.

I loved Casino and Skyfall but couldn't care less about Quantum and Spectre. 

[Thrylos 7]

17 minutes ago, RandomCat said:

Like super defensive dude, calm down. It borrowed the tropes and stereo types of Blaxploitation, without actually getting any of the deeper meanings from those tropes. Outside of Quarral Jr, who has a pre-existing relationship with Bond, every Black Person in the movie is a villain. None are portrayed as on the good side. Even Rosie Carver is a double agent. The fact that is horribly misrepresents black culture. Just because you cast a black actors in leading roles, doesn't mean your movie isn't racist.

 

First of all you come off as upset my post was completely calm. The rest of your post....whatever, that’s ridiculous 2018 talk.

[Jessie]

8 minutes ago, RandomCat said:

 The Irony.

Either you don't known what irony means or you don't know what the term snowflake means

[RandomCat]

14 minutes ago, Thrylos 7 said:

First of all you come off as upset my post was completely calm. The rest of your post....whatever, that’s ridiculous 2018 talk.

I have learned, the person who gets offended enough to "Kind of racist" to post a paragraph long response going No it's not is completely calm. But when someone just tries to explain their reasons for thinking that, they're upset. And then you're only rebuttal is dismissing because you have nothing really to say, so you'll just try and drag down what I said as irrelevant and pointless. For no real reason, other than how dare I just think differently than you. totally, you aren't the one who's defensive.

 

13 minutes ago, Jessie said:

Either you don't known what irony means or you don't know what the term snowflake means

I'd explain where you're wrong, but I know you're type well enough that you'll ignore whatever I say. So I'll just go ahead and smile are you completely missing the point and move on.

 

(P.S. You two would die if you knew where I'd rank Live and Let Die on my Bond movie list. It would piss you guys off, soooo much.)

Edited May 9, 2018 by RandomCat

[Jessie]

1 minute ago, RandomCat said:

I have learned, the person who gets offended enough to "Kind of racist" to post a paragraph long response going No it's not is completely calm. But when someone just tries to explain their reasons for thinking that, they're upset. And then you're only rebuttal is dismissing because you have nothing really to say, so you'll just try and drag down what I said as irrelevant and pointless. For no real reason, other than how dare I just think differently than you. totally, you aren't the one who's defensive.

 

I'd explain where you're wrong, but I know you're type well enough that you'll ignore whatever I say. So I'll just go ahead and smile are you completely missing the point and move on.

Classic snowflake response

[Avatree]

I don't think jessie is a special snowflake.

[RandomCat]

2 minutes ago, Jessie said:

Classic snowflake response

2 minutes ago, Tree said:

I don't think jessie is a special snowflake.

I don't think so either.

[Avatree]

1 minute ago, RandomCat said:

I don't think so either.

then how is it ?

 

Edited May 9, 2018 by Tree

[RandomCat]

2 minutes ago, Tree said:

then how is it ironic?

Well, because I'm not the snowflake.

 

Edit: Clarification. I'm not the one who offended.

Edited May 9, 2018 by RandomCat

[Jessie]

2 minutes ago, Tree said:

then how is it ?

 

He'd explain why you're wrong, but he can't so he wont 

[Thrylos 7]

9 minutes ago, RandomCat said:

I have learned, the person who gets offended enough to "Kind of racist" to post a paragraph long response going No it's not is completely calm. But when someone just tries to explain their reasons for thinking that, they're upset. And then you're only rebuttal is dismissing because you have nothing really to say, so you'll just try and drag down what I said as irrelevant and pointless. For no real reason, other than how dare I just think differently than you. totally, you aren't the one who's defensive.

 

I'd explain where you're wrong, but I know you're type well enough that you'll ignore whatever I say. So I'll just go ahead and smile are you completely missing the point and move on.

 

(P.S. You two would die if you knew where I'd rank Live and Let Die on my Bond movie list. It would piss you guys off, soooo much.)

No really I don’t give a shit about how you rank live and let die, trust me.

[RandomCat]

1 minute ago, Jessie said:

He'd explain why you're wrong, but he can't so he wont 

*looks at your post right after explaining why*

 

[Jessie]

People even look back on Friends and claim its sexist and homophobic. Its sad

[RandomCat]

Just now, Thrylos 7 said:

No really I don’t give a shit about how you rank live and let die, trust me.

You really don't want to know? Then why did you respond?

[Jessie]

So when Danny Boyle says he wants a feminist Bond movie, does he mean another Casino Royals with a strong female character or is he looking at making bond the sidekick in his own movie? Because one of those options would be good

[Avatree]

5 minutes ago, Jessie said:

People even look back on Friends and claim its sexist and homophobic. Its sad

No, it's actually just not funny.

[Jessie]

6 minutes ago, Tree said:

No, it's actually just not funny.

I can understand some people not liking Friends as it is typical american humour which IMO is never as funny or smart as British humour though i cant help but still love it.

[TombRaider]

this is coming out in 2030. anyway, Gaia Weiss & Úrsula corberó would be good choices for bond girls

[Arlborn]

It's weird how some people choose to be stuck in time.

 

Talking about time, do we think this is keeping its date?

[Barnack]

15 hours ago, TalismanRing said:

 Connery in Diamonds Are Forever was the lone instance - and that was very special circumstances.

 

16 hours ago, grim22 said:

EON will never let the actor have a participation bonus. They will pay a lot upfront but the property is too big for them to offer participation.

 

We are talking about a group EON need (or at least) use many studio like Sony/MGM to finance at lest half of the production and releasing cost here, and they do have participation, but they would not for the actor/director ? Not sure if that is realistic.