Underworld: Blood Wars | Jan 6, 2017 | First Trailer on Page 7

[Bishop54]

7 hours ago, Captain Craig said:

I sense nothing wrong with 91 minutes for this film. It should keep things moving. Hopefully the pace and story match the running time.

This the 4th entry in a vampire vs werewolf film series. Let's not confuse things and expect Godfather now. 

This is the 5th entry, and as far as the runtime is concerned the two weakest entries in the franchise were roughly 90 minutes.

[Captain Craig]

4th sequel...semantics.

I found the story/runtime was fine in the "two weakest entries", not saying they are flawless.

[The Futurist]

The two first Underworld movies are legitimately good in the genre & Len Wiseman is talented.

 

The third was decent, don't remember much about the 4th one tho.

 

 

 

 

 

[4815162342]

43 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

The third was decent

 

 

3rd one made Michael Sheen an action hero.

 

 

That alone is worthy of praise.

[Goffe]

"good in the genre " is just another way of saying "guys this is really REALLY mediocre"

[Bishop54]

@CJohnAre you seeing this next week? 

[CJohn]

14 minutes ago, Bishop54 said:

@CJohnAre you seeing this next week? 

It opens on Thursday here. I might go Friday.

[Bishop54]

Can anyone with snap chat help me set this up? It's sounds really neat. 

 

http://deadline.com/2016/11/underworld-blood-wars-snapchat-3d-lens-1201861318/

 

 

[Bishop54]

On 11/26/2016 at 1:49 PM, CJohn said:

It opens on Thursday here. I might go Friday.

What say you?

[CJohn]

1 minute ago, Bishop54 said:

What say you?

That I had to delay my trip to see this for a few days  

[Bishop54]

15 minutes ago, CJohn said:

That I had to delay my trip to see this for a few days  

[Arlborn]

This is opening in many markets. Any reviews out?

[Bishop54]

8 minutes ago, Arlborn said:

This is opening in many markets. Any reviews out?

It's the Underworld franchise, it's getting murdered as usual.

[Arlborn]

11 minutes ago, Bishop54 said:

It's the Underworld franchise, it's getting murdered as usual.

[Valonqar]

On 11/16/2016 at 8:19 PM, 4815162342 said:

 

3rd one made Michael Sheen an action hero.

 

 

That alone is worthy of praise.

 

Third one is the most rewatchable because it has a legit story, a couple with a legit chemistry (unlike Selene and Michael) and legit vampires and werewolves (unlike werewolf-for-3-seconds-turned-blue-smurf Michael). As vampire and werewolf Romeo and Juliet that the first movie aspired to be, this hits all marks. And, yes, Sheen made surprisingly awesome action hero, much better than your average Pretty Boy Joe Sixpack. 

[shayhiri]

DON'T WATCH THIS!!! TERRIBLE ON EVERY LEVEL. AND ONLY 1 HOUR 15 MINUTES LONG!!

 

THANK THE SHAY LATER.

[Bishop54]

1 minute ago, shayhiri said:

DON'T WATCH THIS!!! TERRIBLE ON EVERY LEVEL. AND ONLY 1 HOUR 15 MINUTES LONG!!

 

THANK THE SHAY LATER.

I love you Shay but I love Selene more...I'll be seeing it multiple times.

[shayhiri]

3/10

 

It's twice as worse as 3 and 4 - and 10 times worse than the first two. Also - 5% at RT.

Edited December 3, 2016 by shayhiri

[CJohn]

16 minutes ago, Bishop54 said:

I love you Shay but I love Selene more...I'll be seeing it multiple times.

A friend of mine saw it today and told it was a ton of fun. 

[Bishop54]

4 hours ago, CJohn said:

A friend of mine saw it today and told it was a ton of fun. 

That's all we expect from these movies, isn't it?