tonytr87 Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, Barnack said: The big advantage of the Iphones is having non-actor on real locations acting closer to their natural behavior with the absence of a camera/sound recorder/crew. Otherwise using an IPhone instead of a better cheap small canon dslr (or the equivalents) feel really like a marketing gimmick. Definitely would be well-suited for documentaries. No doubt about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 This looks great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Binoche Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 looks pretty good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyK Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 It looks pretty bad. Best advice, invest in a proper camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel M Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 looks interesting but with Soderbergh's experimental stuff it has been 50/50 for me. It could be a good movie but just as easily could be as laughable as Full Frontal or The Good German. Bergh doesn't care, he 'll have a new movie out before the year is over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stingray Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Soderbergh's Inland Empire? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Gittes Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, The Stingray said: Soderbergh's Inland Empire? I'd love it if this were revealed to be 3 hours long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 (edited) Logan Lucky was painful to watch so I dunno, the last correct Soderbergh movie was eons ago ... Edited January 30, 2018 by The Futurist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted January 31, 2018 Author Share Posted January 31, 2018 (edited) 7 hours ago, Jake Gittes said: I'd love it if this were revealed to be 3 hours long. Sadly, the iPhone ran out of storage space before he could get to that length Edited January 31, 2018 by That One Guy 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiritComix Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Some shots... don't look good... But I really like all the idea/project, so I'll see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 Begins with 3 positives and 4 negatives https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/unsane/reviews/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Eek. Legs are going to be shite on this one; I was thinking a Side Effects-like run, but now it might be a Logan Lucky opening and 16-17M finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Eek. Legs are going to be shite on this one; I was thinking a Side Effects-like run, but now it might be a Logan Lucky opening and 16-17M finish. this is gonna have like a $3million opening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Eek. Legs are going to be shite on this one; I was thinking a Side Effects-like run, but now it might be a Logan Lucky opening and 16-17M finish. I doubt it even does that much tbh. Could see it full-on flopping ala Hardcore Henry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 Don’t give a shit about the reviews. It’s still a Soderbergh horror film and I’m down 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said: this is gonna have like a $3million opening 6 minutes ago, filmlover said: I doubt it even does that much tbh. Could see it full-on flopping ala Hardcore Henry. Nah, Soderbergh's wide releases don't flop THAT much (then again, neither did Matt Damon films until Suburbicon and Downsizing). Maybe it matches Solaris' unadjusted opening (6.8M) Edited February 21, 2018 by WrathOfHan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Nah, Soderbergh's wide releases don't flop THAT much (then again, neither did Matt Damon films until Suburbicon and Downsizing). Maybe it matches Solaris' unadjusted opening (6.8M) speaking of Suburbicon that’s the weirdest movie that’s gotten a low CinemaScore for me. I can see someone not liking it but the D- it has is baffling. even Downsizing managed a C! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Nah, Soderbergh's wide releases don't flop THAT much (then again, neither did Matt Damon films until Suburbicon and Downsizing). Maybe it matches Solaris' unadjusted opening (6.8M) It's a Bleecker Street release with no starpower and weak reviews. I wouldn't expect it to open much higher than in 1K theaters, if that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Soderbergh is always doing the most. At least he tries to be interesting. Is he still using those goofy colored filters in his films. I thought he retired anyway. My girl Claire Foy is in this so it may be good. I like her acting a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 10 minutes ago, filmlover said: It's a Bleecker Street release with no starpower and weak reviews. I wouldn't expect it to open much higher than in 1K theaters, if that. Soderbergh has full control over its release pattern if I'm not mistaken. It's how Logan Lucky got in over 3k theaters. Unsane definitely isn't getting that many theaters, but something around 2k seems right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...