King Arthur: Legend of the Sword | Guy Ritchie | May 12, 2017 | Charlie Hunnam

[4815162342]

1 minute ago, CoolioD1 said:

i'm pretty sure when the levee breaks was in the trailer for the big short as well?

 

Yeah. And Fincher's Dragon Tattoo used Immigrant Song for its teaser.

[filmlover]

2 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:

probably. this is an outlier. most of the time besides a quirk or two he's the sort of competent functional filmmaker they like for these remakes.

Yeah, I agree. Plus he probably signed on to that because it seemed like a completely safe choice after this mess (so much for that 6 movie franchise you planned, Warner Bros).

[UNDERDOG]

Welp..

 

I wanted positive reception, but it is expected.

I still really like the movie.

[babz06]

I do not trust Richie with Aladdin. 

Edited May 9, 2017 by babz06

[MrGlass2]

On 03/05/2017 at 11:11 PM, MrGlass2 said:

$40M opening, and with long elephant legs $130M+ DOM.

 

10% RT.

 

So far, right on the mark!

[The Futurist]

So we re getting 4 DC movies a year, then.

 

[filmlover]

3 minutes ago, babz06 said:

I do not trust Richie with Aladdin. 

I doubt he'll have too much creative freedom on that one. Disney most likely picked him the same way they probably picked the other directors for their live-action remakes so far (competent enough filmmakers who have shown repeatedly that they're comfortable working with big budgets).

[Chewy]

29 minutes ago, Tele Came Back said:

 

But no one's done a non-twisty version. 

 

[Plain Old Tele]

Just now, Chewy said:

 

 

I feel like I just got double-trolled, first by the post and then by your avatar.  

[Chewy]

For real it seems like not many people realize that Michael Bay is literally making a King Arthur Transformers movie. Bless Michael Bay

[drdungbeetle]

18 minutes ago, filmlover said:

I think the better question is: will Disney keep Guy Ritchie on board to make their live-action Aladdin?

Why even make Aladdin in the first place, it's the worst possible property to remake in the US' current BAN ALL MUSLIMS political phase.

[The Futurist]

Is Wonder Woman s sword magic too and linked to her ?

[drdungbeetle]

8 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

So we re getting 4 DC movies a year, then.

 

Better they fuck up DC than fuck up Western ur-mythology

[Plain Old Tele]

Why are we talking about DC and Wonder Woman in a King Arthur thread?

 

 

[WrathOfHan]

Just now, Tele Came Back said:

Why are we talking about DC and Wonder Woman in a King Arthur thread?

 

 

Why are we talking about Warner Brothers in a Warner Brothers thread?  

[AniNate]

13 minutes ago, filmlover said:

I doubt he'll have too much creative freedom on that one. Disney most likely picked him the same way they probably picked the other directors for their live-action remakes so far (competent enough filmmakers who have shown repeatedly that they're comfortable working with big budgets).

 

That's not much reassurance.

 

Surprise surprise as far as this movie is concerned

[Plain Old Tele]

Just now, WrathOfHan said:

Why are we talking about Warner Brothers in a Warner Brothers thread?  

 

This isn't a general WB thread.

 

 

[drdungbeetle]

1 minute ago, Tele Came Back said:

Why are we talking about DC and Wonder Woman in a King Arthur thread?

 

 

Because we know this movie is already doomed and we have the attention span of gnats?

[filmlover]

3 minutes ago, Tele Came Back said:

Why are we talking about DC and Wonder Woman in a King Arthur thread?

 

 

Because the people wondering "where is the Wonder Woman marketing?!" (it's been there the whole time, silly billies) can calm down now that WB has gotten this bomb out of their system.

[Kvikk Lunsj]

1 hour ago, filmlover said:

One of the quotes on RT:

 

 

It looks like a video game character, My audience really did enjoy the movie but it was a free screening.