Saban's Power Rangers | March 24, 2017 | Teaser Trailer on Page 47

[Klingo]

[Mikasa Ackerman]

The costumes aren't brilliant, but I'm mainly upset that Kimberly's one doesn't have a skirt.

[Chewy]

2 minutes ago, Mikasa Ackerman said:

The costumes aren't brilliant, but I'm mainly upset that Kimberly's one doesn't have a skirt.

 

[Charism]

7 hours ago, Klingo said:

Oh damn I totally forgot that this movie will have Giant Robots vs Giant Monster battle!

[grim22]

7 hours ago, Charism said:

Oh damn I totally forgot that this movie will have Giant Robots vs Giant Monster battle!

 

This movie may not, but if there is a sequel, it definitely will.

[CJohn]

15 hours ago, grim22 said:

 

I hope they use the dinosaur one. 

[lilmac]

On 5/10/2016 at 2:48 PM, CJohn said:

I hope they use the dinosaur one. 

 

Gotta leave something for the sequel. ;-)

[Spidey Freak]

On 10/05/2016 at 9:18 AM, grim22 said:

 

 

Top right pic suggests Rita transforms into a massive dragon thingy for the climax. In which case, yay Rangers picking up Maleficent's slack!

[SpiderByte]

It's a REJECTED version so probably not. 

[DMan7]

On 10/05/2016 at 0:32 AM, Klingo said:

 

There isn't really anything they could do to make it not look like Transformers.

[Outrageous!]

Filming is nearly finished, according to David Denman on Twitter, which was also retweeted by the Power Rangers movie's official Twitter account.  While another movie coming out a week before Power Rangers has a teaser trailer out already, the Power Rangers movie is still out filming now.

[grim22]

10 minutes ago, Outrageous! said:

Filming is nearly finished, according to David Denman on Twitter, which was also retweeted by the Power Rangers movie's official Twitter account.  While another movie coming out a week before Power Rangers has a teaser trailer out already, the Power Rangers movie is still out filming now.

 

There is no hard and fast rule on when a movie should film. The Clint Eastwood movie Sully hasn't wrapped filming yet and it releases in September. Similarly, promotional plans differ by studio as well.

[Outrageous!]

Talk about putting the cart before the horse. From Variety, Jon Feltheimer said Lionsgate could make seven Power Rangers movies.  Does anyone remember Jurassic World last year?  Universal didn't announce a sequel until after it had proven itself at the box office.  And the way the article reads "five or six or seven" reminds me of the way Lebron James said "not four, not five" when he was with the Miami Heat.  I know Lionsgate wants to sound confident about their movie lineup, but 2015 Fantastic Four had a sequel announced before it flopped, so I worry they are repeating what their rivals in the industry have done.

Edited May 26, 2016 by Outrageous!

[antovolk]

13 minutes ago, Outrageous! said:

Talk about putting the cart before the horse. From Variety, Jon Feltheimer said Lionsgate could make seven Power Rangers movies.  Does anyone remember Jurassic World last year?  Universal didn't announce a sequel until after it had proven itself at the box office.  And the way the article reads "five or six or seven" reminds me of the way Lebron James said "not four, not five" when he was with the Miami Heat.  I know Lionsgate wants to sound confident about their movie lineup, but 2015 Fantastic Four had a sequel announced before it flopped, so I worry they are repeating what their rivals in the industry have done.

The problem is Lionsgate answers more to investors/shareholders than other studios, as the studio itself is essentially the publicly traded company as opposed to subsidiaries/daughter companies of conglomerates like TimeWarner etc. Hence a lot of the hyperbole from their part.

 

Aside from the R rating and how it's an original IP, John Wick IMO has far far more potential to be a good franchise for them than PR.

Edited May 26, 2016 by antovolk

[CJohn]

Seven sequels? Lmao. Maybe, just maybe, it does enough to justify one more sequel before it sinks. 

[johnboy3434]

3 minutes ago, CJohn said:

Seven sequels? Lmao. Maybe, just maybe, it does enough to justify one more sequel before it sinks. 

 

Maybe I'm biased, because I'm a long-time fan, but I honestly think that if they hit it out of the park with the first film, they can carry it for several more sequels. If the response is middling, then yeah, we're probably looking at a two-shot.

Edited May 26, 2016 by johnboy3434

[AJG]

It's time to get real.

 

This shit ain't going nowhere. I remember back in school kids became too old for the show, it was like when everyone transitioned from Playhouse Disney to Disney Channel. The franchise became stale to people over the age of 7.  The franchise seems to have coasted due to the fact its dirt-cheap to produce, to this very day half of an episode is lifted from a previously shot Japanese version. The thing just isnt held in high regard especially compared to other action based childrens franchises.

 

I refuse to believe this movie can generate enough interest from anyone over the age of 12 to warrant 7 sequels. Its fucking insane.

 

 

[AJG]

Lord save me

 

 

[johnboy3434]

3 minutes ago, AJG said:

Lord save me

 

 

 

 

...Is there a problem?

[johnboy3434]

12 minutes ago, AJG said:

I refuse to believe this movie can generate enough interest from anyone over the age of 12 to warrant 7 sequels. Its fucking insane.

 

Transformers appealed to the exact same age group. That was then. This is now.

 

Seven sequels is ridiculous, but the idea that this can be successful is perfectly within the realm of plausibility.

Edited May 26, 2016 by johnboy3434