DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS | 05.06.2022 | Disney | 4th Most Profitable Movie of 2022

[Menor the Destroyer]

Blockbusters are too short imo. More things should go 3 hours. 

[Legion Again]

This is the exact same runtime as IM1 which was a great length. IW was a great length. AEG was a great length. Amount of stuff you want to cover*how fast you want the movie to feel= ideal runtime.    
 

In this case I am expecting a fast pace like IW+ a bit less stuff to cover.

Edited April 3, 2022 by Eric Legion

[XXR & Friends]

All I know is, you know damn well Kevin Feige didn't tell Sam Raimi, "Hey Sam, I know the movie needs to be 140-150 minutes but I'm thinking 125 is a better target. Lets tighten this bitch up!"

It's the runtime that it's meant to be. 

[Flopped]

I think it's great that it's 125 (if that is in fact the runtime). So many Marvel movies feel like a bloated, numbing attack on the senses. Being succinct >>>

 

If Jurassic Park can be 127, Marvel movies can be in that ballpark too 

[Immortal]

If anyone is complaining that they can't see enough DS or Wanda in 126 mins then they can just re-watch it, thus they get their longer runtime and we get our inflated box office numbers

[Wormow]

People will be able to see more of Wanda in the Scarlet Witch quadrilogy movies, her cameos in four D+ series Agatha: House of Harkness, Young Avengers, Billy & Tommy, Vision Again and when she is the lead star in the next twenty-seven Avengers movies, as well as the Wanda & Pietro prequel origin movie.

[Eric S'ennui]

 

[Legion Again]

And here I was thinking multiverses became cool when they snagged the highest rated movie on letterboxd

[interiorgatordecorator]

41 minutes ago, Eric Legion said:

when they snagged the highest rated movie on letterboxd

 

that's like the opposite of cool

[grey ghost]

I feel like this is being overpredicted.

[eddyxx]

Really? No one has posted the new poster yet?

 

 

[Legion Again]

18 minutes ago, eddyxx said:

Really? No one has posted the new poster yet?

 

 

Fanmade, though I think they look great

[Movies4Life]

41 minutes ago, grey ghost said:

I feel like this is being overpredicted.

I don't think so.

[eddyxx]

25 minutes ago, Eric Legion said:

Fanmade, though I think they look great

Damn for real? Lol I saw it posted as if they were official lol

[cookieleeann]

5 hours ago, grey ghost said:

I feel like this is being overpredicted.

 

 

Box office? Probably. We'll see. My original prediction was between 105-120 OW. 

 

What are you thinking??

Edited April 5, 2022 by cookieleeann

[XXR & Friends]

 

[Brainbug]

God why does Wanda look so damn fine on every poster?

[grey ghost]

2 hours ago, cookieleeann said:

 

 

Box office? Probably. We'll see. My original prediction was between 105-120 OW. 

 

What are you thinking??

 

I'm predicting the same range. 

[XXR & Friends]

2 hours ago, cookieleeann said:

 

 

Box office? Probably. We'll see. My original prediction was between 105-120 OW. 

 

What are you thinking??

 

Just now, grey ghost said:

 

I'm predicting the same range. 

Delusion lol 

 

Even with Morbius level reception, there’s no way this opens under $150M. My goal target is IM3 OW.

[Brainbug]

17 minutes ago, grey ghost said:

 

I'm predicting the same range. 

 

That would be some serious underestimating in my opinion. If this would be "just" a sequel to Doctor Strange (2016), then id predict the same range, but all the multiverse stuff, the promised cameos, Wandas inclusion and the (even for Marvel standards) pretty good marketing campaign makes 150M the floor imo.