Jump to content

aabattery

Weekend Thread | Actuals ~ BR2049 32.753M :((, TMBU 10.551M, It 9.972M, MLP:TM 8.885M, K:TGC 8.675M, AM 8.446M, TLNM 7.002 M, V&A 4.171M | All those posts will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die

Recommended Posts





1 minute ago, That One Guy said:

 

Actually it is doom and gloom because it's probably opening with 32M

Doesn't 2049 have a budget around $100M, unless I'm mistaken for another movie. It'll likely have solid OS numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





19 minutes ago, John Marston said:

Going back to stars, if not DiCaprio then they should have went with Matt Damon or Brad Pitt for BR2049

It really wouldn't have mattered who starred in it...

 

What would have mattered was getting the GA onboard the franchise...paying network tv to have a hugely advertised reshowing of Blade Runner and streaming it concurrently on Amazon/Twitter/Netflix with all ads during the performance pushing the new movie...that might have helped...

 

Barring a reshowing, doing what Disney does and having a 30 minute to 1 hour special of "where we are in the BR universe" now on network tv and downloadable online might have helped...

 

You needed to get non-fans aware of the premise and excited to see where it went...nothing was done to do that...it didn't matter what actor/actress was in this - if you don't know what the h$ll is going on, you ain't spending $12 on a 3 hour movie...

 

 

Edited by TwoMisfits
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anyaspapa said:

Just because it fails with the general audience doesn't mean it sucks or that anyone who doesn't like it is stupid.   It is preference and taste.   I think IT was awesome,  but someone has the right to hate it without being called names. 

 

BR2049  simply didn't connect.   At the end of the day,  that is the end of the story and it doesn't mean the end of the box office.   

The GA did like it though.

Problem must have been the marketing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, YourMother said:

Doesn't 2049 have a budget around $100M, unless I'm mistaken for another movie. It'll likely have solid OS numbers.

 

$150-$185M according to sources, plus the earnings are split between 3 major companies and a few smaller production companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites















3 minutes ago, MrPink said:

 

It cost at least $150m.

Oh. I might have been thinking of Kingsman. Still looking at early OS numbers it can find a way to break even.

 

Edit: Apparently 2049 budget is ranged from $150M-$185M. This could be problematic then.

Edited by YourMother
Link to comment
Share on other sites



8 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said:

Possible but not probable. WB can sometimes take four months to release movies on Blu-Ray, but it could be out in January. Theaters won't want this re-expanded either when they have smaller BP nominees to show.

WB has a sure-fire BP/BD nominee in Dunkirk. So that's a big internal competition for BR2049 considering that Dunkirk not only got just as glowing reviews but is also a blockbuster of the highest order. WB's not gonna split their campaigning between them. Dunkirk is a priority, BR2049 is going to be some push but not top priority one. MMFR had the advantage of being the only thing that WB had as a possible nominee cause their previous priority crashed and burned in that respect. 

Edited by Valonqar
Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.