Jump to content

aabattery

Weekend Thread | Actuals ~ BR2049 32.753M :((, TMBU 10.551M, It 9.972M, MLP:TM 8.885M, K:TGC 8.675M, AM 8.446M, TLNM 7.002 M, V&A 4.171M | All those posts will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, That One Guy said:

how well did that Spielberg doc do last night?  if it didn't do well then Spielberg will never have a box office hit again.

 

I will be watching that at some point this week, as I have HITC to watch tonight.  that's wrestling for those not in the know :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



8 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:

83 mil for that movie is actually pretty good. but when you're right you're right. i'm sure when no one goes to see that professor marston movie it will definitely prove that no one is interested in seeing a wonder woman film.

I'm not saying no one is interested, just thinking Moana or Cinderella numbers rather than Jungle Book or Beauty and the Beast.

Edited by B D Joe
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, Zakiyyah6 said:

Both Blade Runner and My Little Pony box office proves that cult things do not equal box office and people like myself should  not get caught up in the hype without thinking things through.

Cults need a wider audience to succeed. Eg: A Blade Runner and My Little Pony cross-over - My Little Blade Galloper

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



the-numbers.com touches on 2 important things,

(1) IT's over-performance raising expectations (especially with the WB connection imo)

(2) Grim and dystopian

 

Quote

After It smashed the September weekend record a month ago, further proving that films can open huge at any time of the year, prospects looked great for the long-awaited sequel to Blade Runner. Its trailers had created positive buzz, the early reviews were very favorable, and there was little by way of competition. The bar it needed to cross to break the record, Gravity’s $55.8 million wasn’t even all that high. But something went wrong on the way to the multiplex.

 

Warner Bros. is projecting a $31.5 million opening weekend for Blade Runner 2049, and that may prove to be optimistic, although it should at least top $30 million. That won’t be enough to put it in the top 20 weekends for the month, in spite of enjoying the widest opening in terms of theaters for this time of year.

 

Pinning down exactly what went wrong is always an act of speculation, but clearly enthusiasm for the film was lacking among younger filmgoers, and turnout from older generations (by which we mean over-25s) wasn’t enough to make up for it. Bear in mind that anyone already born when the first movie came out is at least 35 now, and anyone old enough to see the original film when it came out in theaters is now 53 or older. Even though many people (your correspondent included) didn’t see the original until it was on DVD, this is a film that probably needed to be made 10 years ago. Compounding the problem is its portrayal of a dystopian future at a time when it can feel like we’re already living in one.

 

One arguable bright spot is that 2049 beat Blade Runner’s opening weekend when adjusted for inflation, and that film went on to earn around $91 million in today’s money. But Blade Runner opened in just 1,295 theaters, and the theatrical market bore little resemblance to 2017. One telling metric: Blade Runner’s opening weekend theater average was $14,500 in 2017 dollars, while Blade Runner 2049’s will be about half that. Unless the film shows remarkable legs (and, to be fair, it is getting great ratings from audiences), it’ll fall far short of profitability.

http://www.the-numbers.com/news/225570830-Weekend-Estimates-Blade-Runner-Stumbles-Out-the-Gate

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Hot Takes for CBMs:

Panther over $340M

New Mutants over $250M

Deadpool 2 under $300M

Incredibles over Dory

Dark Phoenix under $125M

Aquaman over $350M

Animated Spidey over Lego Batman

Edited by YourMother
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



If, and that’s a BIG IF, Happy Death Day end above Blade Runner, it will be the fifth Horror movie to win a month this year, and the third month on a row being dominated by a Horror movie, and with The Last Jedi probably winning December, we will have Horror movies dominating half of the year, insane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still don't see Mary Poppins doing THAT well. A recast sequel to a super old movie? Good luck. People forget that Disney proper movies are mostly not big hits unless they come from Marvel, Lucasfilm or they are live action versions of popular animated hits. Poppins is not any of those things.

Edited by Zakiyyah6
Link to comment
Share on other sites



12 minutes ago, Mockingjay Raphael said:

If, and that’s a BIG IF, Happy Death Day end above Blade Runner, it will be the fifth Horror movie to win a month this year, and the third month on a row being dominated by a Horror movie, and with The Last Jedi probably winning December, we will have Horror movies dominating half of the year, insane. 

Lego Batman beat Get Out in February by a hair, so it'd technically be the fourth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites











8 minutes ago, filmnerdjamie said:

The question is how much does it drop from The Force Awakens?

I wouldn't be surprised if it goes below Avatar. "Only" 20% drop from TFA (936.66) gives it 749.33, just a hair below Avatar's 1st release (749.77).

30% drop gives 655.66, close to JW's 652.27.

 

Inbetwix those two ends you get 702.5 and that's what I'll go with. I think OW will be close to 210 and the multiplier around 3.35x.

Edited by a2knet
Link to comment
Share on other sites







  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.