ALICE THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS | 5/27/16 | If anyone cares, there is an RT watch in this thread apparently.

[Sam]

I don't think I see a big budget movie that got middle ground/decent RT score this year yet? It's either downright rotten or highly fresh rated. X-Men Apocalypse might be the first if it can get to the 60s range. 

 

I didn't expect anything from this sequel.Though I did like the look of its trailers better than the original. 

[Krissykins]

So... how badly is this going to do?

 

 

HALF of the original? 

[JohnnyGossamer]

14 minutes ago, DAJK said:

Never mentioned big fish

Big Fish belongs somewhere between pretty great and passable. I really dislike Crudup in that one. But, everything else is pretty great. Awesome ending. Powerful. I also left out Apes. That belongs in the awful category.

 

But, essentially as always with Burton, he's only as good the script. He's awful at discerning what works and what doesn't. I think Jane Goldman's an outstanding writer so it wouldn't surprise me at all if his next flick is actually pretty damn good and a return to form.

Edited May 11, 2016 by JohnnyGossamer

[movieboner]

The conspiracy of Disney paying off critics is probably untrue now, since this film is made by Disney and is receiving terrible reviews.

[moviesRus]

Just now, movieboner said:

The conspiracy of Disney paying off critics is probably untrue now, since this film is made by Disney and is receiving terrible reviews.

 

No, Disney just threw this one in as a fake plant and deliberately made it bad/didn't pay the critics so people would get off their scent. GENIUS MOVE.

[movieboner]

It seems like there are never ending conspiracy theories against Disney for paying off critics to destroy the competition. Now, it's about covering tracks and hiding secret malicious plots lol.

[Sean B]

Here is an extended look at Alice: Through the Looking Glass ..... 
 

 

Edited May 11, 2016 by Sean B

[CJohn]

Tim Burton seems excited  

[Sean B]

4 minutes ago, CJohn said:

Tim Burton seems excited  

Lol 

[Arlborn]

It really doesn't look that bad. What I'm saying is that I'll catch it on Netflix someday.

[Sean B]

23 minutes ago, Arlborn said:

It really doesn't look that bad. What I'm saying is that I'll catch it on Netflix someday.

I agree, It definitely doesn't look that bad. In fact, I think it looks better then the Alice in Wonderland movie from 2010. 

[Arlborn]

The trollish thread name is priceless. I'm sure somebody cares, just maybe none in this forum.

 

Or does anyone?

Edited May 11, 2016 by Arlborn

[NickDisney13]

The first one was terrible, so no surprise here.

[RichWS]

I agree, It definitely doesn't look that bad. In fact, I think it looks better then the Alice in Wonderland movie from 2010. 

There's my main man.

[angeldelmito]

It looks good to me. I'm still excited for it despite the reviews.

[shayhiri]

I hated the first one and was frustrated by the love and money it got.

 

That being said, I can't wait to see this one. It looks much better - visually (which is all that matters here).

[mrqe93]

It would be interesting to see whether the movie would be a comeback for Johnny Depp. He's had quite a number of bombs past several years... Lone Ranger, Dark Shadows, Transcendence, Mortdecai. 

[redfirebird2008]

Do we know what the budget is for this one? Can't find anything so far through Google search.

[ddddeeee]

The first Alice went way overbudget at the end, Depp took a price cut for this one and no Burton. I imagine they cost around the same amount.

[mrqe93]

I thought Alice 2 was directed by Tim Burton....

 

Looked at the director James Bobin's work.

 

Some Ali G stuff...

Muppets movies

And the upcoming MIB and 21 Jump Street crossover movie