The Hangover Part II

[Vanilla]

"We Had a Sick Night"

[mdot1982]

Same formula. Stale.

[Vanilla]

Yes the same formula as the first and not as good, however this is still a lot of fun.

7/10

[TheMovieman]

Eh, I just didn't find this very funny and at times was a bit boring. I chuckled a couple of times but otherwise it was a forgettable sequel.2.5/5, C

[Gopher]

A terrible movie. An absolute waste of time. And yet I'll be back for the third, somehow...

[fmpro]

Just okey..But no where near the first6/10

[rockNrollaDIM]

Ok when I saw this last year I thought it was simply a disappointing, lazy rehash of the first movie but still kind of amusing.. now upon rewatch I realize it's just BAD. Only good thing about it is Mr. Chow.But the laziness really is the worst part. It's the exact same fucking movie as TH1. They didn't even try. Just made it a little grosser. ALAN is beyond obnoxious- unfunny, annoying, selfish... totally unlikable character. And yet he's the "star" of the movie...D- bordering on F

Edited June 10, 2012 by rockNrollaDIM

[cheesypoofs]

Not nearly as good as the original. I'm hoping that the third is much better.

C+

[baumer]

Funniest movie of 2011. 9/10

[Noctis]

I stopped watching this ten minutes after they woke up in Bangkok. It was far too boring for me to continue.

[baumer]

Maybe you should watch movies longer than 10 minutes Noctis.

[Noctis]

Read my post again.

[mattmav45]

Regardless, 10 minutes of The Hangover II is 10 minutes too long, IMO. Fucking awful.

[Rudolf]

mediocre rehash of the first

[DAR]

Extremely disappointing. The only moment where I managed a laugh was the photo montage at the end. And lazy is the correct word for this. Nobody in this was likeable especially Leslie. Ken Jeong's "act" is getting really old. D-

Edited June 14, 2012 by DAR

[redfirebird2008]

Love the first one, which is still one of the greatest comedies ever. This sequel, however, is a total rehash and complete waste of time.

 

F

[Kvikk Lunsj]

I got this cor a Christmas present this year and still have not watched it. 

[MrPink]

Honestly, I feel it's a bit underrated. By no means is this a good movie....but there are some elements to it that I do enjoy, even if it is a shameless rehash for the first.

 

6/10

[redfirebird2008]

Honestly, I feel it's a bit underrated. By no means is this a good movie....but there are some elements to it that I do enjoy, even if it is a shameless rehash for the first.

 

6/10

 

LOL no. It has a 6.5/10 on IMDB. I'd call that overrated, even compared to your own rating.

[MrPink]

LOL no. It has a 6.5/10 on IMDB. I'd call that overrated, even compared to your own rating.

That would be assuming my scale matches up with IMDB, I feel like people treat it like its the biggest abomination they've ever seen when I think it's far from it. Lets be honest, a 6.5 does not indicate anything remotely above average on IMDB