Jump to content

Neo

Pan | Oct. 9, 2015 | New Trailer on Page 25!

Recommended Posts



I can't help but cringe on behalf of WB execs every time I see a TV spot.

As in, they are cringing too?

Regardless of how this movie seemed on paper, how it could have turned out, how much effort Joe Wright put into it, or how it actually turns out, I get this feeling WB is thinking "OK, this was greenlit by the last regime and we're stuck with it, let's just get it over with."

Edited by TServo2049
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reviews are out, and they're exactly as you expect.

 

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/pan-film-review-824864?utm_source=twitter

 

THR:The Bottom Line

Pan-worthy.

 

http://variety.com/2015/film/reviews/film-review-pan-1201596436/

 

Variety:Stripping all whimsy and wonder from the Peter Pan story, Joe Wright's prequel is a busy, bungled bust.

Edited by FancyArcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Reviews are out, and they're exactly as you expect.

 

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/pan-film-review-824864?utm_source=twitter

 

THR:The Bottom Line

Pan-worthy.

 

http://variety.com/2015/film/reviews/film-review-pan-1201596436/

 

Variety:Stripping all whimsy and wonder from the Peter Pan story, Joe Wright's prequel is a busy, bungled bust.

 

BD4b4uq.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



How did this sound like a good idea to anyone?

 

Positioned as a prequel to J.M. Barrie’s classic Peter Pan stories, “Pan” swaps puckish mischief and innocence for doses of Steampunk design, anachronistic music, a stock “chosen one” narrative and themes of child labor, warfare and unsustainable mineral mining

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





So this is not only Peter Pan Begins, but also Pan-vatar, with pixie dust as the stand-in for Unobtainium?

And am I the only one who got a vibe of this being more a semi-knockoff of Stardust with the Peter Pan mythos grafted onto it?

Meanwhile, there must be rejoicing at Disney, for this will be forgotten in five years and they can conceivably swoop in with their own live-action remake of the 1952 version, or their purported Peter and the Starcatchers adaptation, without fear of it being confused with this one. (Not saying that's a good thing either, but my point is that this has no chance of gaining a foothold in the public consciousness...)

Edited by TServo2049
Link to comment
Share on other sites

















Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.