Avatar: The Way of Water | 16 DEC 2022 | Don't worry guys, critics like it

[vc2002]

I think you mean...less lawsuits.

 

No I mean no lawsuit, because with 800m Fox probably would claim losing money on Avatar.

[dashrendar44]

Fox & James Cameron Slapped With $50M ‘Avatar’ Copyright Suit By Album Cover Artist

 

Then Roger Dean ripped off René Magritte and nature.

 

"Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief"

 

Cameron should give Dean money and tells his Avatar 2 designers that they should stop digging their 70's fantasy artbooks to find inspiration when they're told to design psychedelical rain forest and creatures because it's obvious that's that type of stuff (With Moebius Heavy Metal thrown in the mix) they will ultimately draw influence from directly or indirectly.

Edited June 29, 2013 by dashrendar44

[Ozymandias]

Why hasn't Blizzard Entertainment filed a lawsuit yet?  James Cameron clearly played

Warcraft.

 

 

[kowhite]

Why hasn't Blizzard Entertainment filed a lawsuit yet?  James Cameron clearly played

Warcraft.

 

 

There's no Internet connection underwater...team Cameron here! He's innocent!

[Ozymandias]

There's no Internet connection underwater...team Cameron here! He's innocent!

 

Never! Blizzard needs to get on this, its exactly the same.

 

 

 

Edited June 29, 2013 by Shpongle

[dashrendar44]

Why hasn't Dean filed a suit against Blizzard Entertainment for blatantly steal his art then?

[kowhite]

Loving purple and blue doesn't mean it's a ripoff...right? It's not like there are pandas in Avatar...

[The Futurist]

THESE LAWSUITS ARE SO FUCKING RETARTED IT IS NOT EVEN FUNNY.

[bballman24]

I dreamt of this Avatar-like world when I was a kid one night.

JC obviously stole the idea from me via psychic powers. I'm so gonna sue his ass now!!!!!!!!!!

[The Futurist]

The bats should sue Warner Brothers for Copyright infringement on their wings which inspired the shape of Batman costume.

[Dilusha Bandara]

AVATAR 2 - 2016 DECEMBER

AVATAR 3 - 2017 DECEMBER

[ladyevenstar22]

lol i'm pretty sure i saw those floating rocks in dragon ball z as a kid !

 

its a hard life being a billion dollar film-maker ! i hope the world and myself are still around when these films come out, pandora fan for life that place is just lush and rich and appeals to the fantasies of this sedentary movie geek 

[Cochofles]

God created birds. ;-) Birds fly. God should sue the estate of Siegel and Schuster and DC Comics for ripping him off regarding a flying Superman.

Edited July 5, 2013 by cochofles

[vc2002]

lol i'm pretty sure i saw those floating rocks in dragon ball z as a kid !

 

its a hard life being a billion dollar film-maker ! i hope the world and myself are still around when these films come out, pandora fan for life that place is just lush and rich and appeals to the fantasies of this sedentary movie geek 

I'm sure Spielberg, Lucas, Nolan, Bay, Cameron they all are living fatantically.

[Cochofles]

Out-fucking-standing!! I want JC to do Wonder Woman, dammit!!!

[tommycruise]

Whats the story this time? They start humping trees and then make out with them?

[A Marvel Fanboy]

James Cameron Says 'Man Of Steel' & 'Iron Man 3' Probably Didn't Have To Be In 3D

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/james-cameron-says-man-of-steel-iron-man-3-probably-didnt-have-to-be-in-3d-20130705?

 

"I do not think Hollywood is using the 3D properly," he said at the conference, with Laverdad (via The Film Stage) recapping the higlights. "The reason I say that Hollywood is not doing well is because it is automatic. For example, 'The Man of Steel,' 'Iron Man' and all those movies should not necessarily be in 3D. If you spend 150 million on visual effects, the film is already going to be spectacular, perfect." You would think that the same logic would apply to Cameron's already expensive "Avatar," but it was shot in 3D, whereas the superhero flicks were conversion jobs, and that's where the difference lies.

 

"One thing is shooting in 3D and another to convert to 3D. After 'Avatar' changed everything, good and bad movies, everything has to be in 3D since 'Avatar.' The problem I see now is that instead of it being a filmmaker issue is a matter of the studios to make money and are pushing 3D to directors who are not comfortable or do not like 3D," Cameron elaborated. 

 

But hypocrisy and ego or not, Cameron isn't wrong -- both "Man Of Steel" and "Iron Man 3" weren't particularly made better by 3D. But the big question is what is Cameron going to do with the format and special effects in the developing "Avatar" sequels to push the envelope again? Well, he isn't aiming to top himself in that department exactly. "...we are not going to invent a new 3D or (new system of) CG. We're going to go a little more to strive for creativity," he said.

 

And what's after those "Avatar" movies? Well, Cameron is still going on about making "Battle Angel," which he says will start moving in earnest in 2017, and will be about "trans-humans" or something. We think 2017 is an optimistic time frame, but sure, we'll go along with that for now. Anyway, check out an excerpt from the Cameron/Cuarón chat below. 

[A Marvel Fanboy]

 

 

A History of Plagiarism Claims Against James Cameron

 

Avatar has got 8 listed lawsuits so far ...

[kayumanggi]

That's what happens when your film makes gargantuan numbers. lol

[The Futurist]

American Lawyers are vile, greedy, soulless human beings.

 

They have as much compassion & empathy as cockroaches.

Edited July 7, 2013 by The Futurist