SpiderByte Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 (edited) Yes, this is happening: http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/skyline/30645/skyline-2-coming-liam-odonnell-to-direct Edited May 22, 2014 by SpiderByte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fancyarcher Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Someone must be desperate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted May 22, 2014 Author Share Posted May 22, 2014 (edited) In fairness the first one did technically make money. It had a budget of 10 million. Edited May 22, 2014 by SpiderByte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Gittes Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 This is direct to video, right? Right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Films Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Ha ha haWhat is the more pointless sequelSpring breakers 2 or skyline 2I remember the first one doing really badly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fancyarcher Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 In fairness the first one did technically make money. It had a budget of 10 million. Yeah, but it was pretty much universally reviled. Can't see a sequel doing well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tawasal Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Hollywood................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FilmBuff Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 What the fuck man? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Yeah, but it was pretty much universally reviled. Can't see a sequel doing well.It'll make enough $$$ in Russia to cover 75% of the costs......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Craig Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Wait, what? A Skyline sequel? Wasn't that the shitty Alien invasion movie set in LA where the biggest name was the cop Angel from Dexter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart360 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Dat ending. I'm actually glad about this as i want to know what the hell was going on with that ending. Also i don't care what the reviews say, the film wasn't THAT bad, i actually found it quite interesting seeing the chaos and destruction from a high rise apartment block. Also i call bullshit on that $10mil budget for the first film. The film was full of cgi, pretty good quality cgi as well. I bet the actual budget was closer to $30mil. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Yeah, but it was pretty much universally reviled. Can't see a sequel doing well.To be fair, I don't think even the people who went to watch Skyline remember that there was a movie called Skyline. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spazz91 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 just read the summary on wikipedia. what. kind of strange, but since it ended in a cliffhanger I guess I'm glad they're doing a sequel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Dat ending. I'm actually glad about this as i want to know what the hell was going on with that ending. Also i don't care what the reviews say, the film wasn't THAT bad, i actually found it quite interesting seeing the chaos and destruction from a high rise apartment block.Also i call bullshit on that $10mil budget for the first film. The film was full of cgi, pretty good quality cgi as well. I bet the actual budget was closer to $30mil.Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathlife Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 I don't really rag on movies endlessly but the first Skyline was genuinely terrible.It was unpleasant and the end was horrible. Just horrible all round.I'm surprised some people want to see a sequel to it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorWho Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 I liked the first one! I'm happy they are doing this! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 The first is a disgrace. One of the worst movies ever. Kill this with fire. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deep Wang Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Dat ending. I'm actually glad about this as i want to know what the hell was going on with that ending. Also i don't care what the reviews say, the film wasn't THAT bad, i actually found it quite interesting seeing the chaos and destruction from a high rise apartment block.Also i call bullshit on that $10mil budget for the first film. The film was full of cgi, pretty good quality cgi as well. I bet the actual budget was closer to $30mil.It's because The Brothers Strauss(ugh) started and own that VFX company. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted May 22, 2014 Author Share Posted May 22, 2014 Dat ending. I'm actually glad about this as i want to know what the hell was going on with that ending. Also i don't care what the reviews say, the film wasn't THAT bad, i actually found it quite interesting seeing the chaos and destruction from a high rise apartment block. Also i call bullshit on that $10mil budget for the first film. The film was full of cgi, pretty good quality cgi as well. I bet the actual budget was closer to $30mil. Except then it probably wouldn't have been greenlit for a sequel, since it made only 20 million domestically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jandrew Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
