Jump to content

grim22

The Meg | Aug 10 2018 | WB-China co-production | IMAX 3D | Jon Turteltaub directing. Jason Statham fights a shark. Li Bingbing replaces Fan Bingbing.

Recommended Posts



15 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

 

Because it's a megalodon.

I really don't get.  "Sahara" novel series sold about 40 million copies, and the movie opened to $18 million (around $26 million based on 2018 ticket price.) 

 

"Meg" novel series sold more than 4 million copies (as of 2011) .  I don't know why "Meg" movie would open much higher. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, John2015 said:

I really don't get.  "Sahara" novel series sold about 40 million copies, and the movie opened to $18 million (around $26 million based on 2018 ticket price.) 

  

"Meg" novel series sold more than 4 million copies (as of 2011) .  I don't know why "Meg" movie would open much higher. 

 

 

 

I just explained:

 

It's a megalodon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



6 hours ago, John2015 said:

I really don't get.  "Sahara" novel series sold about 40 million copies, and the movie opened to $18 million (around $26 million based on 2018 ticket price.) 

 

"Meg" novel series sold more than 4 million copies (as of 2011) .  I don't know why "Meg" movie would open much higher.

Maybe The Meg will flop, but that is a strange comparison to make. Popularity of a book matters for the box office, but it isn't the only factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





8 minutes ago, TwoMisfits said:

This movie is preselling double screens at one of my locals (single screened at the other) even with how tight the market is...that's either one of the dumbest decisions this local has made in awhile, or maybe the teens tracking could be a touch off...

 

My AMC is planning on booking it for two screens as well; only 2D shows are up in the biggest auditorium, so a 3D screen is more than likely coming.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a gigantic shark. I used to believe the film will flop because the first trailer made it look like total trash but im now rooting for this to breakout. Its Jason Statham's bad acting vs a giant shark for gods sake, its fail-proof.

 

Cant wait to see this masterpiece and upcoming classic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



I mean those early reactions do not indicate future good reviews lol. But that said they most certainly haven't skimped on marketing for this, shit is everywhere. Then again could say the same for Skyscraper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:

I mean those early reactions do not indicate future good reviews lol. But that said they most certainly haven't skimped on marketing for this, shit is everywhere. Then again could say the same for Skyscraper

 

Skyscraper looked really....been there, done it though. The Meg has a Megalodon. It cant fail.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



I'm pleasantly surprised that the first reactions are positive. Expected a pretty unsuspenseful, too goofy film.

I also wouldn't underestimate it at the box office. As often mentioned here people like to see sharks plus giant animals/beasts/creatures as e.g. in Jurassic Park/World, Godzilla or Skull Island. And Skyscraper didn't (fully) deliver as a pure summer blockbuster-, fun- and CGI-film. Plus Statham (in the right film) has its fans. Additionally, The Meg really gets some (we will see how much it increases next week) talking on social media, I noticed that last week when I was looking how M: I 6 is doing in this field. Finally, I can't find an actual budget number but let's say it's indeed 150M. That number alone should cause some curiosity and attract more people. I'm at least much more interested now.
I don't want to exaggerate yet again and throw in a number but these are the reasons why I think the predictions of only 14.5/38M (proboxoffice.com) are way too low.

Edited by el sid
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 minutes ago, el sid said:

I'm pleasantly surprised that the first reactions are positive. Expected a pretty unsuspenseful, too goofy film.

I also wouldn't underestimate it at the box office. As often mentioned here people like to see sharks plus giant animals/beasts/creatures as e.g. in Jurassic Park/World, Godzilla or Skull Island. And Skyscraper didn't (fully) deliver as a pure summer blockbuster-, fun- and CGI-film. Plus Statham (in the right film) has its fans. Additionally, The Meg really gets some (we will see how much it increases next week) talking on social media, I noticed that last week when I was looking how M: I 6 is doing in this field. Finally, I can't find an actual budget number but let's say it's indeed 150M. That number alone should cause some curiosity and attract more people. I'm at least much more interested now.
I don't want to exaggerate yet again and throw in a number but these are the reasons why I think the predictions of only 14.5/38M (proboxoffice.com) are way too low.

Yeah, BOP's prediction is way too low. It makes no sense to have Slender Man about 50% higher than The Meg :lol: 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



11 hours ago, John2015 said:

I really don't get.  "Sahara" novel series sold about 40 million copies, and the movie opened to $18 million (around $26 million based on 2018 ticket price.) 

 

"Meg" novel series sold more than 4 million copies (as of 2011) .  I don't know why "Meg" movie would open much higher. 

 

 

 

Because novel sales don't always equate to box office.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 hours ago, MrGlass2 said:

Maybe The Meg will flop, but that is a strange comparison to make. Popularity of a book matters for the box office, but it isn't the only factor.

Because I saw considerable amount of online people defending "The Meg" box office chance by saying the novel series is hugely popular.  (At least, the Variety article is keeping this kinds of comments. ) 

http://variety.com/2018/film/news/meg-shark-movie-history-1202864110/

 

Of course,  Popularity of a book is only one factor.

 

"Sahara" is also a very entertaining and fun film.  However, entertaining and fun aren't enough for doing huge box office. ("Rampage" is also very entertaining and fun.)

 

Jurassic Park/World, Godzilla or Skull Island also have hugely famous IPs and mostly positive reviews. Of course "The Meg" may also get mostly positive reviews.

 

Edited by John2015
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





3 hours ago, baumer said:

 

Because novel sales don't always equate to box office.  

At least you need to be the same "genre" with similar target audience to make the comparison solid. Sharks/monster movies can work as original property.

 

If you divide the US book sales of the Dan Brown series with the franchise OW, and the correlation between the sales and OW was quite something.

 

Book sales:

DA VINCI CODE:

83 million

International – 58 million

Domestic – 25 million

 

ANGEL AND DEMONS:

45 million

International – 30 million

Domestic – 15 million

 

Box office

1 The Da Vinci Code Sony $217,536,138 3,757 $77,073,388 3,735 5/19/06
2 Angels & Demons Sony $133,375,846 3,527 $46,204,168 3,527 5/15/09

 

77m/25m = 3.08

46.2m / 15m = 3.08

 

But even then Inferno plumetted even more than the book sales did.

 

The correlation between Young adult type sales and box office was not bad either, but far from perfect

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.