Wonder Woman 1984 | Dec 16 2020 OS | Dec 25 2020 US and on HBO MAX

[ChipDerby]

49 minutes ago, AndyK said:

Competition isn't the problem, getting the film finished in time is the problem.

 

The movie is 13 months away, and can't be far from principal photography finishing. Why would that be a problem?

[AndyK]

4 hours ago, ChipMunky said:

 

The movie is 13 months away, and can't be far from principal photography finishing. Why would that be a problem?

Principle photograthy won't be finished until end of December and that it the shortest part of making an action blockbuster.

 

VFX quality is directly proportional to the amount of time spent on it.

[ChipDerby]

28 minutes ago, AndyK said:

Principle photograthy won't be finished until end of December and that it the shortest part of making an action blockbuster.

 

VFX quality is directly proportional to the amount of time spent on it.

 

WB/DC is one of the only studios that generally takes almost 12 months of post production. Most other studios do it in 6-10 months.

 

There are already elements of the film IN POST. Like, they don't just wait until it's all done to start working. They're going to have almost 11 months after principal to get it done. You'd have to have no knowledge of the film industry to think that's not enough time.

[AndyK]

10 minutes ago, ChipMunky said:

 

WB/DC is one of the only studios that generally takes almost 12 months of post production. Most other studios do it in 6-10 months.

 

There are already elements of the film IN POST. Like, they don't just wait until it's all done to start working. They're going to have almost 11 months after principal to get it done. You'd have to have no knowledge of the film industry to think that's not enough time.

Batman Begins 2005

The Dark Night 2008

The Dark Night Rises 2012

 

Its not about how long they are spending, its about how long they should be spending to make a good movie.

 

Minimum 3, preferably 4 years between movies.

 

Less than that and they have compromised somewhere in the process.

 

 

[Krissykins]

3 minutes ago, AndyK said:

Batman Begins 2005

The Dark Night 2008

The Dark Night Rises 2012

 

Its not about how long they are spending, its about how long they should be spending to make a good movie.

 

Minimum 3, preferably 4 years between movies.

 

Less than that and they have compromised somewhere in the process.

 

 

[ChipDerby]

So you think it should take 2-3 years to write a movie? That's not how it works mate.

[Barnack]

21 minutes ago, AndyK said:

Batman Begins 2005

The Dark Night 2008

The Dark Night Rises 2012

 

Its not about how long they are spending, its about how long they should be spending to make a good movie.

 

Minimum 3, preferably 4 years between movies.

 

Less than that and they have compromised somewhere in the process.

 

 

Considering Nolan made The Prestige and Inception during that time frame... that a really strange metric.

 

 

[AndyK]

9 hours ago, ChipMunky said:

So you think it should take 2-3 years to write a movie? That's not how it works mate.

and that's why we don't get TDK quality movies any more.

 

Quote

“That’s a privilege and a luxury that filmmakers aren’t afforded anymore. I think it was the last time that anyone was able to say to a studio, ‘I might do another one, but it will be four years’. There’s too much pressure on release schedules to let people do that now but creatively it’s a huge advantage. We had the privilege and advantage to develop as people and as storytellers and then bring the family back together,” Nolan explained.

https://theplaylist.net/christopher-nolan-advantage-dark-knight-20171204/

 

Having said that, the long shooting schedule gives me hope that this is going to be more character and practical effects/stunt driven that a VFX overload.

Edited October 18, 2018 by AndyK

[ChipDerby]

20 hours ago, Barnack said:

Considering Nolan made The Prestige and Inception during that time frame... that a really strange metric.

 

 

 

@AndyK you just gonna ignore this?

[Barnack]

2 minutes ago, ChipMunky said:

 

@AndyK you just gonna ignore this?

He did address it by that Nolan quote, even too that big time period between movie was not dedicated into developing the next Batman one it was for the best (to have something to say with those character):

We had the privilege and advantage to develop as people and as storytellers and then bring the family back together

 

That could make some sense, but that was not what the conversation seemed to be about when the talk was about having enough time to finish the movie.

[PanaMovie]

 

[Valonqar]

WTF? wasn't WW84 a 2019 release originally? Noooooooooooo. too long a wait! 

[TheDarkKnightOfSteel]

4 minutes ago, PanaMovie said:

 

IDK 3 years are just so damn much of a wait...but the original was a filn that made m9st of its money by showing legs and now it won't have to face the SW/Frozen,the overload of GA friendly films in 2019 or being the 3rd female SH film in the same year.

Edited October 22, 2018 by TheDarkKnightOfSteel

[Krissykins]

I think it’s fine, the first did so well in June anyway. 

 

The person complaining that there wasn’t enough time between films can rest easy now. 

 

From Gals post it looks like this is what they’d originally planned too. 

[fabiopazzo2]

On 9/27/2018 at 12:13 AM, Wonder89 said:

Strange, Marvel troll @fabiopazzo2 don’t like the post 😂😂😂

5 years old? 

 

Mmm maybe 3

Edited October 22, 2018 by fabiopazzo2

[filmlover]

Another late 2019 title moving to 2020. One of the three November 8 releases (Kingsman, Midway, Sonic) will definitely move up a week now.

[KeepItU25071906]

8 minutes ago, PanaMovie said:

 

[Valonqar]

maybe they don't want competition with CM and measuring who got better reviews/made more money. That's smart on their part.

Edited October 22, 2018 by Valonqar

[stephanos13]

Noooooooooooooooo I have to wait 8 more months now.

[Valonqar]

I'm devastated but if that results in another great movie, even better than the first, why not?