Madame Web | February 14, 2024 | Sony Spider-Man Movie I SJ Clarkson to direct

[SpiderByte]

2 minutes ago, BadOlCatSylvester said:

This trailer, if anything, made me glad that the Hemsworth iteration of Star Trek 4 never got made, as that had this director attached. A CW fanfilm aesthetic is the last thing either that brand needed, or Spider-Man and Marvel need.

Wasn't that supposed to be the Abrams one? I think they moved on from the Hemsworth angle by the time Clarkson was on.

 

Weirdly this trailers being promoted by the main Marvel Entertainment accounts, Twitter/YouTube etc, which I believe the previous Sony movies were not. Maybe part of their new deal?

[reddevil19]

1 minute ago, SpiderByte said:

Weirdly this trailers being promoted by the main Marvel Entertainment accounts, Twitter/YouTube etc, which I believe the previous Sony movies were not. Maybe part of their new deal?

Disney being like "Yo, guys - looks like Sony can make The Marvels look good by comparison. Let's promote it."

Edited November 15, 2023 by reddevil19

[Arlborn]

50 minutes ago, SpiderByte said:

Wasn't that supposed to be the Abrams one? I think they moved on from the Hemsworth angle by the time Clarkson was on.

 

Weirdly this trailers being promoted by the main Marvel Entertainment accounts, Twitter/YouTube etc, which I believe the previous Sony movies were not. Maybe part of their new deal?

Good catch, big chance of that.

 

And dang it, now I want a Star Trek 4. Into the Darkness was pure entertainment 

[keysersoze123]

This is releasing at a time we will have few releases. but this feels like better bet for a tv series than movie. At least budget should hopefully be not that much. 

Edited November 15, 2023 by keysersoze123

[Marathon]

Hopefully Sony will be as shameless as ever about sprinkling its movie with Sony product placement so it can be used as a drinking game.

[Mr Impossible]

Over/Under $15M OW?

[WittyUsername]

Why do all these Sony movies look like they’re from the mid-2000s? 

[Belakor]

TBH looks very bad to me, like a bad SH film from 2004 or something like that.

 

[Masketta Man]

40 minutes ago, Marathon said:

Hopefully Sony will be as shameless as ever about sprinkling its movie with Sony product placement so it can be used as a drinking game.

You can spot a guy playing a PSP in the trailer already

[SpiderByte]

I stand corrected, they also did it for Across the Spider-Verse (even back when it was called Part 1), so if it's part of a Sony deal it's not a new one.

[fede75]

1 hour ago, SpiderByte said:

 

 

Weirdly this trailers being promoted by the main Marvel Entertainment accounts, Twitter/YouTube etc, which I believe the previous Sony movies were not. Maybe part of their new deal?

seems was true that it's a marvel studios coproduction

[fede75]

20 minutes ago, SpiderByte said:

I stand corrected, they also did it for Across the Spider-Verse (even back when it was called Part 1), so if it's part of a Sony deal it's not a new one.

makes sense, there was a mcu character in the movie ( without counting postcredit)

[TheDude391]

Perhaps I treated Morbius too harshly. Even by Sony standards this looks BAD.

[SpiderByte]

18 minutes ago, fede75 said:

seems was true that it's a marvel studios coproduction

I mean the Marvel Studios one isn't promoting it, and their logo isn't in the title or credits. It's just the standard "in association with Marvel" one

[Zakiyyah6]

I see absolutely no proof that this film was a co-production with Marvel Studios, so I don't know where anyone is getting that from. The Spider-Man movies look like MCU movies, Madame Web does not. 

[Squire]

Looks like another incoming flop for Sony’s spider man universe, which I’m happy about. This was always a horrible idea and blatant cash grab. 

[fede75]

18 minutes ago, Zakiyyah6 said:

I see absolutely no proof that this film was a co-production with Marvel Studios, so I don't know where anyone is getting that from. The Spider-Man movies look like MCU movies, Madame Web does not. 

there were thing about that months ago

Edited November 15, 2023 by fede75

[fede75]

29 minutes ago, SpiderByte said:

I mean the Marvel Studios one isn't promoting it, and their logo isn't in the title or credits. It's just the standard "in association with Marvel" one

true but is weird kraven isn't being promoted by marvel entreteinment like madame web

[SpiderByte]

5 minutes ago, fede75 said:

true but is weird kraven isn't being promoted by marvel entreteinment like madame web

Maybe? But Marvel Studios didn't produce Spider-Verse (even though there are MCU references, but Sony can do those without Marvels involvement like they did with Venom 2s ending)

 

I feel if Marvel Studios was more directly involved they'd have that all over the promo.

Edited November 15, 2023 by SpiderByte

[Jean Claude Web Madam]

Despite Sony, I see this surpassing The Marvels.