Fake Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 It is on track to do 30M (35M at max) 5-day if that 5-6M number holds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Ugh. I wanted this to tank or perform badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedarpoint1111 Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Why?? O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I want Titanic to reign supreme! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Because it's in 3D, and I don't like James Cameron. I love the film, but no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonytr87 Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 (edited) ^Agreed. These re-releases are just another way for Hollywood to avoid originality. They're worse than remakes, no matter how good the movie is. Edited April 5, 2012 by tonytr87 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockNrollaDIM Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I disagree. I wish more movies could get targeted rereleases. There's nothing like seeing your favorite movie on the big screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grey ghost Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I just want Titanic to hit 160 m WW so Cameron will have two movies that made 2 billion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheba Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 ^Agreed. These re-releases are just another way for Hollywood to avoid originality. They're worse than remakes, no matter how good the movie is.Re-relesses have always existed. Gone with the wind, star wars,.. all multipul times. I like them because you get the chance to see them again on the big screen. I rather spend money on them, than bad new movies or bad sequels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I just want Titanic to hit 160 m WW so Cameron will have two movies that made 2 billion. Thats easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grey ghost Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Thats easy.I'm not going to pop the bubbley until it's official.or at least until we get some oversea numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fake Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I disagree.I wish more movies could get targeted rereleases. There's nothing like seeing your favorite movie on the big screen.I would rather prefer that money going to charity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyevenstar22 Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 hey guys i had no idea titanic was opening today, i thought i read somewhere it was opening on april 10th? very happy to hear this ,can't wait to see it 3D or not !! i was a teenager when i saw this 16yrs, i can hardly remember the experience, its possible there was an intermission for popcorn and drinks etc i vaguely remember...i wonder if there'll be one this trip although since then i've seen all LOTR films and no intermissions to be had but then its a different theatre now(this one has 7screens) and the old one had only 4 screensand yeaaahh if this passes 2B$ james cameron will be insufferable and smug(rightly sooo! ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheba Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 (edited) I would rather prefer that money going to charity.Don't worry I donate to charity every month. If I wouldn't go to the theaters I would still donate the same amount. And going to the theaters often also helps the theaters employers to keep their job. Edited April 5, 2012 by Sheba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kvikk Lunsj Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Because it's in 3D, and I don't like James Cameron. I love the film, but no.Agreererelease in 3D and plus James Cameron already has enough money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lab276 Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I don't understand the disdain for rereleases from some here. They've been part of the cinema experience since the beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kvikk Lunsj Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I don't understand the disdain for rereleases from some here. They've been part of the cinema experience since the beginning.That was before home video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I don't have a problem with rereleases actually. It's the fact that it's in 3D. Like really? James Cameron annoys the crap out of me too. I also prefer rereleases over bad movies, but the 3D pisses me off. And I understand you can watch in 2D, but it's like never offered here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheba Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 (edited) Agreererelease in 3D and plus James Cameron already has enough money.I don't care how much money that guy has or how he spends it. If I have a good time watching it on the big screen again. Then it was worth my money. Edited April 5, 2012 by Sheba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Agreererelease in 3D and plus James Cameron already has enough money.Exactly. Like we get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
