Jump to content

Eric Prime

THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER WEEKEND THREAD | The hammer swings down with 144.2 DOM, 302 WW, the 3rd-biggest 2022 opening | Minions 46.1, TGM 15.5, Elvis 11.2, JWD 8.6

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, titanic2187 said:

My top 5 summer hit before summer start.

1. JWD 475m

2. DS2 450m

3. Thor:LT 400m

4. Minion  250m

5. Lightyear 235m

:whosad:
 

6. Top gun 2 225m

:hahaha:
 

In short, summer 2022 come above my prediction because of a movie that I look down the most. Still, I am so happy for this surprise. 

 

 

I didn't had Summer prediction right before Summer but last June was thinking

 

Thor 4 - 450M

DS2 - 400M

Lightyear - 350M

JW3 - 350M

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



46 minutes ago, Legion and Thunder said:

 

 

About 1.9 with this buzz I'd say. So from M37's weekdays (which are quite close to mine) I would add (192-29)*.9=147 for 340ish finish.

I think it matters why it has less than stellar WOM. It's not like Eternals, which was too serious/adult, or even MoM, which was seen as a bit of a bait and switch/false advertisting, and "too scary" - both of these turned off families, and impacted legs. Thor L&T is "bad" because its unserious, not a fan movie, but that's better for families, especially with July weekdays, no?

 

Since you had all the data compiled, I went ahead and whipped this up, comparing total gross to the first 7 days of release, not removing previews (Opening Week Multiplier). The July releases are noted in lighter blue, which all had better legs than one might expect for reception (except for BW, obviously), and here is where Thor L&T would slot with $192M first week and $350M total gross. Seems about right to me

 

CalVQni.jpg

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, charlie Jatinder said:

US embarrassed Potter films. No $500M film is just unfair of US

 

 

 

always thought it was weird that Hunger Games outgrossed  Potter and Twilight movies came very close to their grosses domestically. Hasn't HP sold way more books? HG and Twilight must have really appealed to non book readers more

Link to comment
Share on other sites



10 minutes ago, Ipickthiswhiterose said:

2000s was the worst era for blockbusters and of all the reclamation/nostalgia projects we DONT need it's people pretending any of the Transformers films or any of the Pirates films after the first 2 were good. It's not that they were bad really, so much as they were incoherent noise made by committee with tonal whiplash.

What's with this "pretending" thing? Nobody is pretending anything, people are just giving their honest opinions. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





18 minutes ago, TwoMisfits said:

 

Should I keep reading posts to see if anyone pointed out they are the best 2 "big" movies of the summer, too?

😉

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



18 minutes ago, Ipickthiswhiterose said:

2000s was the worst era for blockbusters

 

Nah, I would say the 2000s were better than the 2010s

 

2000s had LotR trilogy, 6 Potter movies, Avatar, Batman Begins+Dark Knight, peak Pixar, Pirates, 2 good Spiderman movies and 2 good X Men movies.

2010s had Planet of The Apes, Hunger Games, Mission Impossible 4-6 and a few good MCU movies

Edited by Grebacio
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the only summer that seems to be outperforming its reception to me is AM1, which  is explained by the tiny raw size and being a first entry. I think if we did a regression with reception, first vs sequel, and OWeek rank (or adjusted OW gross or whatever) as variables we’d find almost no summer vs not summer relationship — including the weekdays ~kills the vacation benefit (as it should).

Edited by Legion and Thunder
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, titanic2187 said:

The weekend aggregate total come in around 232m, the highest of the year and the 2nd highest since pandemic. Should go higher in actual but still come slightly disappointing because I was hoping it got closer to 250m.

 

Might get an aggregate weekend over $250M if BPWF opens over $210M. If not then, the best shot would be Dec 16-18.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Grebacio said:

Nah, I would say the 2000s were better than the 2010s

 

2000s had LotR trilogy, 6 Potter movies, Avatar, Batman Begins+Dark Knight, peak Pixar, Pirates, 2 good Spiderman movies and 2 good X Men movies.

2010s had Planet of The Apes, Hunger Games, Mission Impossible 4-6 and a few good MCU movies

 

2010s had the best X-men films with First Class, Deadpool, and Logan

  • Like 1
  • Disbelief 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, Grebacio said:

Nah, I would say the 2000s were better than the 2010s

 

2000s had LotR trilogy, 6 Potter movies, Avatar, Batman Begins+Dark Knight, peak Pixar, Pirates, 2 good Spiderman movies and 2 good X Men movies.

2010s had Planet of The Apes, Hunger Games  and a few good MCU movies

I think a few good MCU is understatement.

 

MCU alone did the heavy lifting for 2010s, and 2010s also got HP DH 2 & DH 1.

 

Best Star Wars film ever; TLJ 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



5 minutes ago, THUNDER BIRD said:

Didn't Harry Potter had 43 million previews? 

 

And weekend 169.

Yeah, it did. Correct.

 

Though somehow DH2 didn’t get to $400M+ DOM for some reason, despite it being treated as the finale of the Harry Potter-franchise. 😲


It’s not like the WOM of that film was horrific or bad, right? 🤷🏻‍♀️
 

Since it was the most critically-acclaimed of all the HP-films.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



13 minutes ago, charlie Jatinder said:

US embarrassed Potter films. No $500M film is just unfair of US

 

Maybe because most Potter films really weren't that good. 🤷

  • ...wtf 1
  • Disbelief 1
  • Knock It Off 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



21 minutes ago, Ipickthiswhiterose said:

2000s was the worst era for blockbusters and of all the reclamation/nostalgia projects we DONT need it's people pretending any of the Transformers films or any of the Pirates films after the first 2 were good. It's not that they were bad really, so much as they were incoherent noise made by committee with tonal whiplash.

 

I've even seen people trying to reclaim the 00s bin juice anus dribble of parody movies: White Chicks, Little Man, Meet the Spartans, Epic Movie bilge on the basis that they 'weren't woke' or something, as if that in and of itself makes them ok.

 

No. The relative homogeneity of competently-made but predicable and safe movies now is not a reason to suddenly flutter eyes at movies that were the reason we needed the relative homogeneity of competent-made but predictable movies.

 

Spiderman 3 is an interesting precedent for what people are experiencing wit the MCU now. It has all the good things people liked about the first two and the same flaws, but by the third movie the good things were less effective and the flaws more obvious. Thor Love and Thunder and Ragnarok are perfect examples. All the problems people have with L&T were, arguably, worse in Ragnarok and all the positives are still there. It's just that we've seen this before now.

 


2000s gave us LOTR.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I'm assuming most of these will come up a bit with actuals. With Deadline reporting 42.1M SAT for TLT, I'd think the SUN number has a chance or is it even likely to come in something like 2M to 3M higher than the Disney projection. And, as mentioned, I expect just about everything else to come up a little bit too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites









  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.