Jump to content

lilmac

Is Christopher Nolan among the alltime greats?

Recommended Posts

With six critically acclaimed movies under his belt, is it too early to list (not rank) among the greatest directors? I don't think so. By 1989, when Spielberg was the same age as Nolan (42) is now, we knew that he would be a legend. Same for Kubrick, Scorcese, and Coppolla. Nolan has impeccable filmmaking skills and a fantastic range. What do you think? Does he need more movies under his belt? Does he need more timeless classics to qualify (2001, ET, Godfather)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



He's a great director but I think he should go in a different direction for his next films, Spielberg has alway been a mix of serious and populist with Indiana Jones, ET, Schindler's List, Jurrasic Park etc whereas Nolan's quite a serious director, I couldn't see him doing a family film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I've loved almost everything he's produced but he needs more range. Just look at Kubrick, Speilberg, Scorsese and the like. So many unique pictures. Even the Coens have branched pretty widely, even if their quirk is signature to all of their work. I would argue Fincher isn't either (yet) because he applies the same feel to all of his movies whether the script calls for it or not. For my money he's directed two great movies (Zodiac and TSN).

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I want to be in love with all of Nolan's work, but I always seem to leave with a sense of disappointment when I watch his movies, aside from BB and TDK. I'm sure I'm in the minority on this, but there's always that one last piece that seems to be missing for me. I love his ideas, but some of the writing needs work. Inception for example had all the makings of being an amazing thriller with tons of brains behind it. The brains were there, but something was oddly missing. Compelling dialogue for one, and the James Bond/Golden Eye video game level inspired third act suffered. He's one of those directors that could benefit from exiting his comfort zone for sure. I reckon that he still has a magnum opus inside him somewhere. I really like to believe that TDK is just the tip of the iceberg.

Edited by haku
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Not yet, but he really showed with TDKR that he's maturing into a director that can handle extremely dramatic situations. I think TDKR will turn out to be his vehicle into his original dramas, and will ultimately be where he transitioned into one of the greats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



He's a great director but I think he should go in a different direction for his next films, Spielberg has alway been a mix of serious and populist with Indiana Jones, ET, Schindler's List, Jurrasic Park etc whereas Nolan's quite a serious director, I couldn't see him doing a family film.

So Hitchcock is not one of the greats because he didn`t make a family movie? Just because a director isn`t a genre crossover it doesn`t make him less great.

Anyway, Nolan is undoubtly the greatest director to come out of the aughts cinema. However, it`ll take more than a decade for him to join all-time greats. Not because of the number of movies they made vs his (Cameron filmography is short but boy do those movies hold up) but because the merit is really how his opus is regarded decades later. And by that I mean when there are no sequels and prequels and reboots etc to renew interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





So Hitchcock is not one of the greats because he didn`t make a family movie? Just because a director isn`t a genre crossover it doesn`t make him less great.Anyway, Nolan is undoubtly the greatest director to come out of the aughts cinema. However, it`ll take more than a decade for him to join all-time greats.

Well, Hitchcock gets away with anything because he's made films like Rebecca, Rear Window, Strangers on a Train, North by Northwest, and so on. When you consistently make films that wonderful, you can stay in that zone.Now I won't be seeing TDKR until tomorrow morning so I don't know how Nolan concludes the whole Batman thing, but with 4 of his past 5 films being big spectacles, it'd be good for his career and development if he steps away from BIG films for at least a couple goes at it. If both of his films are along the scope and aim of say The Prestige I'd be cool with that, since The Prestige rocked and is his 2nd best outing so far.Even though Kubrick and I have a rocky relationship (I dislike a couple of his films a hell of a lot) I have to admire how diverse his filmography is. From war films (Paths of Glory, Full Metal Jacket) to sci-fi trippyness )2001) to dystopia (A Clockwork Orange) to period epics (Barry Lyndon) to black comedy (Dr. Strangelove) to horror (The Shining). Edited by 4815162342
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Christopher Nolan is awesome, but he needs to continue making his magnificent films to be considered one of the all-time greats. It's much harder in this day and age to make a real name for yourself when tons of blockbusters come out every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites









Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.