wileECoyote Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 $135M for production, another $50M for marketing.How much does Hasbro pick up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bapi Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 The marketing from last year, plus 5-10M for the 3D conversion. It wasn't cheap. I'm sure they spent more then they wanted to. Yeah, should be around 220M with marketing. But Viacom is Viacom and merchandising will be huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 GI Joe will make money. International grosses will be stronger than the first film. With DVD/Blu ray sales and of course the main reason the film was made, the merchandising sales, this film will be in the green Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLK Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 GI Joe's production budget is probably closer to $150 million. This $135 million cost was being bandied about last year before they added 3D and did any reshoots. They ran super bowl ad last year for GI Joe 2 and the regular ad campaign had already started when the movie was pushed back so its ad cost is also much higher than $50 million. Nevertheless, this is a pretty solid start for the movie and they will likely make money in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bapi Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 GI Joe's production budget is probably closer to $150 million. This $135 million cost was being bandied about last year before they added 3D and did any reshoots. They ran super bowl ad last year for GI Joe 2 and the regular ad campaign had already started when the movie was pushed back so its ad cost is also much higher than $50 million. Nevertheless, this is a pretty solid start for the movie and they will likely make money in the end. Was 125M before 3D. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLK Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 Was 125M before 3D. I just googled it and you are correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 Was 125M before 3D. You belive reshoots and 3D only cost 5M ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 So even then it's $40M less than the first movie, not including marketing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bapi Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 You belive reshoots and 3D only cost 5M ? 10M and Clash of the Titants convert did cost 7M 3 years ago. Didn't see that movie but people think reshoots were not huge. Probably just 3D. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bapi Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 So even then it's $40M less than the first movie, not including marketing. I think The Rise of Cobra did cost 280M (incl. marketing). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 I don't think they reshoot anything, tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 They delayed it to do 3D and reshoot with Tatum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 They delayed it to do 3D and reshoot with Tatum. Well, Tatum is in no more than 5 minutes of this in the beginning, so I strongly doubt that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmpro Posted March 30, 2013 Author Share Posted March 30, 2013 How much does Hasbro pick up? 50 mill+ and some of the marketing also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceroll Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 She beat the 200m worldrecord of Marita Koch http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marita_Koch who also never confessed using steroids, but whose 400m world record like Flo-Jo's 100m and 200m worldrecords will remain unbeatable for a very long time. Marita Koch's 47.60 over 400m, compare with 400m winning time in London(2012) 49.55 Neither Krabbe nor Jones, both drug-assisted could get near Flo-Jo's times. If you want to believe an athlet, who ended her carreer as soon as drug testing became more rigoruos , do so. Um I've never heard of her until today but you seem to have a personal vendetta against her. She died from suffering an unexpected severe epileptic seizure, she didn't commit suicide... and it's quite tragic. The coroner's didn't find any traces of drugs when they did an autopsy. To talk so much shit about someone who died so tragically is kind of uncalled for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 (edited) Well, Tatum is in no more than 5 minutes of this in the beginning, so I strongly doubt that. 20 minutes. They added the panties scene and them playing Video games. You can tell those were re-shoots. The coloring didint even fit the movie lol Edited March 30, 2013 by Dragon 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitik Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 Well, Tatum is in no more than 5 minutes of this in the beginning, so I strongly doubt that. If they added anything, it was the video game scene and the cupcake scene. Neither of which were scenes that would've broke the bank. Both could've been made pretty cheaply. As for the cost of the movie overall vs the first one, remember, the first GIJoe had a TON of computer special effects. All the underwater scenes and the Ripcord plane scenes and the Pit scenes and especially the Paris scene probably cost a whole lot of money. It felt like they went with a few more practical special effects in this second one, as opposed to CG. Plus the first one felt like it had a much bigger cast. I can definitely see how they cut down costs for this second one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wileECoyote Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 50 mill+and some of the marketing alsoSo about the same as RoC. Heh I guess GI Joe 3 is pretty much a given if this arrangement keeps up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 Theyre funny yes, but the well written aspect is not accurate.In your opinion maybe, but for the most part they are well written. Madea has a very devoted fanbase and he writes what they want him to write. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Why are people saying GI Joe 2 is dissapointing? It wasn't expected to match the first domestically wasn't it? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
