Chewy Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I was gonna ask if there was a reason they didn't bring back Isla Fisher but then I decided to google it and it looks like she was pregnant. Guess they didn't want to spend the money working around that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 1 minute ago, Chewy said: I was gonna ask if there was a reason they didn't bring back Isla Fisher but then I decided to google it and it looks like she was pregnant. Guess they didn't want to spend the money working around that 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 they coulda subbed in amy adams no one would notice. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 3 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said: except like planet of the apes how many movies with twist endings even get sequels? that on it's own is such a weird idea to me. even in apes they must've realised the narrative corner they'd put themselves in so they blew up the planet to start from scratch at the end of the second. so I'm betting the same thing happens here. I hope this happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 (edited) I haven't seen the first one: without spoiling, please (if it's like a death or something major like that)...does it make sense that Isla is not back? ETA that I just saw the previous message that explained it. Edited November 18, 2015 by Cochofles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewy Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Just now, Cochofles said: I haven't seen the first one: without spoiling, please (if it's like a death or something major like that)...does it make sense that Isla is not back? No lol but the first movie didn't really mind not making sense 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 1 minute ago, Chewy said: No lol but the first movie didn't really mind not making sense Thanks! :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I chuckled at the final bit with Radcliffe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 DanRad's post-Potter career has been weird lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 4 minutes ago, filmlover said: DanRad's post-Potter career has been weird lol. Still better than Rupert Grint's. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 5 minutes ago, filmlover said: DanRad's post-Potter career has been weird lol. It hasn't been all that bad, tho. He had some solid hits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 He gets steady work. Victor Frankenstein's gonna hurt though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Just now, 4815162342 said: He gets steady work. Victor Frankenstein's gonna hurt though. I don't think he is hurting for money or anything, so he picks weird little indies mixed with medium budget movies. He has unconventional looks so he knows he won't be a mainstream star in Hollywood, so good for him choosing whatever he wants to make. Even if it is completely bonkers movies like Horns and Victor Frankenstein. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I think the twist of the first movie was misunderstood and that it s a very solid ground for a sequel. Go figure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowhite Posted November 19, 2015 Share Posted November 19, 2015 I didn't really like the first movie. Felt like it was...trying to be clever, but, really, it wasn't. What do I know, audiences seemed to like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Hunt Posted November 19, 2015 Share Posted November 19, 2015 I enjoy the first movie for the most part though I thought the twist was pretty stupid. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted November 19, 2015 Share Posted November 19, 2015 The Chinese translation of the movie title is just awesome 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted November 19, 2015 Share Posted November 19, 2015 has Caine ever looked more bored in a film 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted November 19, 2015 Share Posted November 19, 2015 the first movie was on my worst of the year list but I like Lizzy Caplan and Radcliffe bit was clever, so I may watch it on Netflix 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Skywalker Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 On 11/19/2015, 5:01:16, filmlover said: DanRad's post-Potter career has been weird lol. weird.. yes but picking some unique roles. He was very good in What if. Now on a mainstream movie like Now you see me 2,he's picking up good. Really liked the trailer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...