Monday Numbers (Actuals: Hunger Games-$3.4m, FRZ-$2.4m, Thor2-$0.53m, Homefront-$0.503m)

[baumer]

It hasn't behaved like either of those movies, so yes, it probably will.

[Leyla]

Do you guys ever sleep?

lol I didnt

Who needs sleep when u have a DoS premiere to obsess over  

 

so no answer abt Lionsgate thread??? Baumer??

Edited December 3, 2013 by Leyla

[baumer]

I have no idea. Go ahead and make one.

[redfirebird2008]

Studios care about their overall gross, sure but I don't think they can fudge the numbers THAT MUCH to get them.

 

What about your favorite fudge job, Terminator Salvation?

[baumer]

What about your favorite fudge job, Terminator Salvation?

 

That's different.  They were following mojo at the time and they did it just to spite us.  

 

http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2009-07-15&track=terminatorsalvation.htm

 

13

TERMINATOR SALVATION Warner Bros. 221

$34,504 -50.4% / $156 $123,142,908 / 54

$34,607 +0.3% / $157 $123,177,515 / 55

$104,225 +201.2% / $472 $123,281,740 / 56

$66,958

Edited December 3, 2013 by baumer

[#ED]

So this looks to make 4.5M today?

[baumer]

So this looks to make 4.5M today?

 

It looks like the Tuesday grosses after Thanksgiving weekend a bit muted.  So maybe a 10-15% bump instead of 25-30.

[Goffe]

unprecedented for a sequel to an already enormous film. 

[iceroll]

 

He was talking about the multiplier, both those sequels had much lower multipliers Mr. Notbeingsopositive

[mattmav45]

Let the post-holiday collapses and fanboy meltdowns begin.

 

IMO.

[LexJoker]

He was talking about the multiplier, both those sequels had much lower multipliers Mr. Notbeingsopositive

Well THG had the third highest OW when it came out and CF OW was only around 3% higher than THG's.

[ban1o]

 

That's different.  They were following mojo at the time and they did it just to spite us.  

 

http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2009-07-15&track=terminatorsalvation.htm

 

13 TERMINATOR SALVATION

Warner Bros.

221 $34,504

-50.4% / $156

$123,142,908 / 54 $34,607

+0.3% / $157

$123,177,515 / 55 $104,225

+201.2% / $472

$123,281,740 / 56 $66,958

 

LOL this is funny 

[lab276]

Well THG had the third highest OW when it came out and CF OW was only around 3% higher than THG's.

If it was following normal sequel rules it would end up significantly below THG.

[Goffe]

He was talking about the multiplier, both those sequels had much lower multipliers Mr. Notbeingsopositive

first: I only posted those posters because I thought they were pretty 

second: I can easily refute your post, but I won't because I can't say anything negative about CF.

[Goffe]

dat DMC multiplier, it had a 3.15 multiplier after OW record.

 

(this post is not related to CF)

[DAR]

Let the post-holiday collapses and fanboy meltdowns begin.

 

IMO.

No  meltdown or panic here

 

 

 

No sir

 

It's all good  

 

 

We're all calm

 

[LexJoker]

If it was following normal sequel rules it would end up significantly below THG.

Exactly. If it indeed was following normal sequel rules, it would have opened much higher than the original.

[lilmac]

Rth is fascinating to me.  I was just reading a few of his past posts.  All of his comments are very abbreviated but that's what so cool about him.  You have to know boxoffice-ese to understand some of his posts.  When he does respond, he gets multiple likes every time no matter how substantive it really is.  LOL    He must be the most well liked poster here (baumer is 2nd).

[Goffe]

CF Monday drop was so amazing. I think haters are a bunch of whiners.

Edited December 3, 2013 by Goffe Luvs 1D

[DAR]

Rth is fascinating to me.  I was just reading a few of his past posts.  All of his comments are very abbreviated but that's what so cool about him.  You have to know boxoffice-ese to understand some of his posts.  When he does respond, he gets multiple likes every time no matter how substantive it really is.  LOL    He must be the most well liked poster here (baumer is 2nd).

I think it goes Rth, Tele, Baumer, Shawn, DAR, then everyone else