DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS | 05.06.2022 | Disney | 4th Most Profitable Movie of 2022

[eddyxx]

5 hours ago, Thanos Legion said:

Illuminati confirmed

Surprised they actually used the name. 10 days til every Karen on fb is posting Marvel is part of the Illuminati.

[Cooper Legion]

10 minutes ago, eddyxx said:

Surprised they actually used the name. 10 days til every Karen on fb is posting Marvel is part of the Illuminati.

It’s a plot by the real Illuminati to desensitize people to their existence by over-saturating the use of the term 

[XXRDJisDoctorDoom]

18 minutes ago, eddyxx said:

Surprised they actually used the name. 10 days til every Karen on fb is posting Marvel is part of the Illuminati.

Yes this will absolutely be a thing. 

[AJG]

What in the Final Fantasy is going on here?

 

 

Edited April 26, 2022 by AJG

[Jeight]

1 hour ago, fabiopazzo2 said:

2022 and people care about The score 

 

 

They will always care about objective measures of reception like most sports fans care about trophies, rings or records.

 

Everyone wants validation that their team is winning. Its hard to defend a critically panjed flop.

[Menor the Destroyer]

18 minutes ago, Jeight said:

They will always care about objective measures of reception like most sports fans care about trophies, rings or records.

 

Everyone wants validation that their team is winning. Its hard to defend a critically panjed flop.

...no it isn't. You just have to say why you like the critically panned flop.

[ZeeSoh]

23 minutes ago, Jeight said:

They will always care about objective measures of reception like most sports fans care about trophies, rings or records.

 

Everyone wants validation that their team is winning. Its hard to defend a critically panjed flop.

Neither reviews/ratings nor their aggregates are objective measures of reception. May be you do not understand that word. Even something like box office based on money, which one would think is objective, stems from peoples subjective desire, bias and perception to either see a movie or not. Though the box office would come closest if you really wanted an objective measure of reception. 

[WittyUsername]

2 hours ago, eddyxx said:

Surprised they actually used the name. 10 days til every Karen on fb is posting Marvel is part of the Illuminati.

Are Illuminati conspiracies still a thing?

[Saul Goodman]

 

[Jeight]

1 hour ago, Menor Reborn said:

...no it isn't. You just have to say why you like the critically panned flop.

of course  anyone can say it.  But not anyone will be able to debate the level of its failure if by most metrics,  it did fail. 

[Jeight]

1 hour ago, ZeeSoh said:

Neither reviews/ratings nor their aggregates are objective measures of reception. May be you do not understand that word. Even something like box office based on money, which one would think is objective, stems from peoples subjective desire, bias and perception to either see a movie or not. Though the box office would come closest if you really wanted an objective measure of reception. 

A movies legacy is largely define but it's critical reception.  It's naive to believe that it's not the case. There have been very few instances of films that were widely panned by critics to be adored by audiences. 

On the other hand there have numerous films adored by the public that are acclaimed by critics. It's naive to believe a films legacy isn't impacted by its critic reception.  Would Lords of the rings be as successful if it was as acclaimed? Star Wars? How many films that have standards the test of time are reviled critically? And I'm not talking cult status. 

[eddyxx]

1 hour ago, WittyUsername said:

Are Illuminati conspiracies still a thing?

Yea but now the Illuminati is pop stars and rappers.

[eddyxx]

56 minutes ago, Saul Goodman said:

 

That’s one hell of a poster. If I can get that I might put it on my wall. And Wanda looks like a villain here.👀

[eddyxx]

53 minutes ago, Jeight said:

A movies legacy is largely define but it's critical reception.  It's naive to believe that it's not the case. There have been very few instances of films that were widely panned by critics to be adored by audiences. 

On the other hand there have numerous films adored by the public that are acclaimed by critics. It's naive to believe a films legacy isn't impacted by its critic reception.  Would Lords of the rings be as successful if it was as acclaimed? Star Wars? How many films that have standards the test of time are reviled critically? And I'm not talking cult status. 

A lot of old films I like ,I didn’t know critics hated , til recently. The first Blade is a banger but has a terrible score on RT. Lord of movies like that. Pretty sure Friday doesn’t have a good score and that was a classic on day one.

[Maggie]

Scott predicts  Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (Walt Disney/May 6/$350 million)

[ThomasNicole]

Just now, Maggie said:

Scott predicts  Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (Walt Disney/May 6/$350 million)

He asks to people mocking him 

 

Who is still expecting 350M total with these presales? If we know how it's doing he probably knows too.

[Cooper Legion]

16 minutes ago, Maggie said:

Scott predicts  Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (Walt Disney/May 6/$350 million)

Christ, it’s gonna do good, but not endgame good. Cmon Scott 

[WittyUsername]

Scott Mendelson is a joke. 

[Jeight]

2 hours ago, eddyxx said:

A lot of old films I like ,I didn’t know critics hated , til recently. The first Blade is a banger but has a terrible score on RT. Lord of movies like that. Pretty sure Friday doesn’t have a good score and that was a classic on day one.

Exceptions and outliers. The vast majority of "classics" are critically acclaimed films. At least 90% of them. Of course there will he exceptions like blade.

[fabiopazzo2]

2.3M views for The spot, really good