Cochofles Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 9 hours ago, Mojoguy said: I'm sure Jessica Chastain has already been cast, they are just waiting to announce that with the release date for Part 2. Also I'm sure Chastain will be the biggest star in it and will get the most focus out of the rest of the adult cast. They don't have much time if they want to make the 2019 release, especially with needing to film the kids stuff for the flashbacks since they are growing up so fast, and WB probably doesn't' want to spend too much for huge stars, which is a good thing. I want to see the characters first not a bunch of famous actors, so keep Brad Pitt away from this movie! Has Pitt been mentioned? See, that (not Chastain) would be the kind of casting that would truly take me out of the film. Chastain is a relatively well-known working actress, but Brad Pitt is a mega star and a huge tabloid-friendly, gossip-fueled, icon-level name. Obviously, certain types of film are great platforms for stars as big as Pitt, but I don't feel that an It sequel would be...um...it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeepItU25071906 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 13 hours ago, Cochofles said: While everyone talks about Chastain and Adams as possible adult Bevs, watch as Bryce Dallas Howard (who I assume is cheaper to get than Amy and Jess) snags the role... I like all 3 options. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 I think it's funny that everybody is saying Bev has to be played by the two or three red heads in Hollywood and no one else. Not enough famous red head actresses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Let's dreamcast this motherfucker: Bev: Jessica Chastain Richie: Bill Hader Eddie: Adam Scott Mike: Sterling K. Brown IDK anyone else 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuffinMan Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 (edited) September 6, 2019 release date. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/it-sequel-set-september-2019-1042845 Edited September 25, 2017 by MuffinMan 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted September 25, 2017 Author Share Posted September 25, 2017 FUCK YOU BEAT ME Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonwo Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Just now, MuffinMan said: September 6, 2019 release date. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/it-sequel-set-september-2019-1042845 Least surprising date, I imagine the Blumhouse film will move now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmpro Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Very expected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zakiyyah6 Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 If Blumhouse doesn't want a guaranteed flop they will move their film. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoobSaibot Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Blumhouse needs to move if it wants a good weekend for whatever horror film they initially planned on releasing that day. Otherwise, it'll be a bloodbath. Also, props to WB for sticking with September instead of cramming it into Summer like people feared they would do. Not that I expected them to try it, but still... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zakiyyah6 Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 12 minutes ago, NoobSaibot said: Blumhouse needs to move if it wants a good weekend for whatever horror film they initially planned on releasing that day. Otherwise, it'll be a bloodbath. Also, props to WB for sticking with September instead of cramming it into Summer like people feared they would do. Not that I expected them to try it, but still... Yep, putting it in Summer for no reason would have been a poor move. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I knew it! I had a feeling the sequel was coming out on a September. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGamer Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Smart to keep it in September. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DlAMONDZ Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Let me guess: WB signed Muschietti to only 1 movie because they weren't confident IT would be such a big hit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Let me guess: WB signed Muschietti to only 1 movie because they weren't confident IT would be such a big hit? Andy Muschietti is getting ready for that big payday from WB right now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuffinMan Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 2 hours ago, DlAMONDZ said: Let me guess: WB signed Muschietti to only 1 movie because they weren't confident IT would be such a big hit? It's pretty standard practice for young filmmakers on studio films. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marveldcfox Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) Smart of WB. Fox can learn a thing or two from them. Kingsman 2 in February or even August would have done much better domestically. Next year Deadpool 2 will disappoint at boxoffice by dropping atleast 30M. I am expecting 50-60M drop. They should have locked a february release for it or better yet a December release so that legs would have been solid. Edited September 26, 2017 by marveldcfox 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) 11 hours ago, DlAMONDZ said: Let me guess: WB signed Muschietti to only 1 movie because they weren't confident IT would be such a big hit? LOL The part of the article that jumped at me was the bit about the director "waiting in the wings to return." Edited September 26, 2017 by Cochofles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeepItU25071906 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 12 hours ago, DlAMONDZ said: Let me guess: WB signed Muschietti to only 1 movie because they weren't confident IT would be such a big hit? Did you believe in "IT" success two years ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a2k Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 So Hollywood gonna continue to ignore Labor Day weekend? Good for late August releases, they will continue to leg it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...