Jump to content

eddyxx

Fantastic Four | Marvel Studios | July 25, 2025 | Matt Shakman directs

Recommended Posts

Moderation

 

We're not doing this sexist nonsense. If you can't handle women being cast in a silly kids movie about superheroes, go somewhere else. We're not the only place on the Internet where you can talk about Marvel. Don't know why I have to keep reiterating this stuff, but I guess I'll keep doing it until some folks get the message.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



8 hours ago, marveldcfox said:

No one wants this version of silver surfer. Bombs away. 

What do you mean by no one? The majority of people who watch superhero movies aren't even hardcore Marvel fans nor have picked up a single comic book in their entire life. Moreover, even within the hardcore fans luckily some of us have common sense and don't get offended when they cast a woman lol 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



25 minutes ago, AN9815 said:

What do you mean by no one? The majority of people who watch superhero movies aren't even hardcore Marvel fans nor have picked up a single comic book in their entire life. Moreover, even within the hardcore fans luckily some of us have common sense and don't get offended when they cast a woman lol 

I've even seen some comic book fans (as in nerds who actually read comic books) defend this decision to have a female silver surfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  

2 minutes ago, AN9815 said:

Moreover, even within the hardcore fans luckily some of us have common sense and don't get offended when they cast a woman lol

Plenty of "true fans" got angry at James Bond for being blond in 2006. It's been completely memory holed because the reaction didn't match people's actual experience of the Craig films. Fan anxiety that adaptation will not match their desires is also just a thing in-and-of-itself that's just hard to engage with before you actually have a finished product to unveil. Culture war stuff supercharges it but there's also just a more banal anxiety at play. 

 

"This character you've been anticipating will not actually appear but his love interest will and she will have his powers" has a culture war valance but also just has a raw text valance. I'm probably the only person in the world who experienced confusion and annoyance at encountering Basil Karlo as Clayface instead of Matt Hagen, an objectively inferior version of the character (in this case it's less the name than the basic characterization/backstory) because there's a small but real hook to the character from a goofy comic book I read as a 9 year old. 

 

latest?cb=20160617213654

 

This is a very stupid objection from an "objective canon" approach (both gold and post-silver age versions use the version with a more dramatically relevant backstory but it's also just an obviously real gut reaction. It's just goofy how we pretend this doesn't exist when culture war stuff is layered on top. 

 

 

49 minutes ago, AN9815 said:

What do you mean by no one? The majority of people who watch superhero movies aren't even hardcore Marvel fans nor have picked up a single comic book in their entire life. Moreover, even within the hardcore fans luckily some of us have common sense and don't get offended when they cast a woman lol 

The whole text/subtext of this being a morally significant act (often combined with a claim to correcting a past injustice) is not unrelated to the rest of the discourse. That's actually a different dynamic than if audiences will in practice accept or reject an adaptation. Both are interesting but they're obviously separable even if people's rhetoric will never admit that. 

 

Ultimately, adaptations can play by Whose-line-is-it-anyways rules as seen by both TDK and Joker having wildly successful Jokers with a strained connection to the character's target image (including visually for TDK) but it ends up being completely accepted by strength of adaptation. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 hours ago, Eric Atreides said:

Why does this always happen when I'm asleep?


Unless a load of posts got deleted before I saw them, nothing happened. Comic book movie discourse is increasingly concerned with imagined outrage way more than actual outrage. Joker really opened the floodgates on that one.
 

anyway, no idea about silver surfer lore but garner almost single-handedly made ozark watchable so this is a win for marvel as far as I’m concerned 

 

Edited by Hatebox
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



11 minutes ago, Hatebox said:


Unless a load of posts got deleted before I saw them, nothing happened. Comic book movie discourse is increasingly concerned with imagined outrage way more than actual outrage. Joker really opened the floodgates on that one.
 

anyway, no idea about silver surfer lore but garner almost single-handedly made ozark watchable so this is a win for marvel as far as I’m concerned 

 

There was at least one deleted post that called Disney “woke” for the Julia Garner casting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



20 minutes ago, kayumanggi said:

GKU3oksbYAAA6Tp?format=jpg&name=large

So considering the futuristic city in the background, I'm pretty sure the movie takes place in a separate universe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, kayumanggi said:

GKU3oksbYAAA6Tp?format=jpg&name=large

So Reed and Sues outfits really are the uniforms then!

 

Edit: I just noticed Johnny's face also has the lines on it. Definitely didn't expect them to adapt it so literally

s-l1600.jpg

 

Edited by SpiderByte
Link to comment
Share on other sites













Actually, the bottom right corner of the Torch poster has a credit for 20th Century Studios...hm

 

Just checked and the Deadpool poster also has it, but much smaller in font. Guess it's a holdover from the Fox acquisition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, SpiderByte said:

Actually, the bottom right corner of the Torch poster has a credit for 20th Century Studios...hm

 

Just checked and the Deadpool poster also has it, but much smaller in font. Guess it's a holdover from the Fox acquisition?

Giver the full name of the Studio they acquired was 20th Century FOx, that is a very safe guess.

20th Century will be Disney's Touchstone and Hollywood Films for the new miiilinium:Handling material they do not want going out under the Disney label to keep the Disney family friendly thing intact, though R rated movies will not be the only thing Disney will release with the 20th Century label.

Wonder if we will get the famous 20th Century Fanfare with the new 20th cenutry releases.

I think the first film  Disney released with the 20th label was "West Side Story"..though why they did that I don't  know nothing in it that would not have fit under the Disney label.

Edited by dudalb
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.