Fancyarcher Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Was worried there for a second. Glad to here that reviews are good enough. I'll be seeing this in the cinemas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Just now, WrathOfHan said: Nathan Fillion and Kerry Washington are in this too. I kind of don't want to read more about the cast because I keep getting surprised Chris Cooper and Lea DeLaria (Big Boo on Orange is the New Black) are also in this lmao. What a wacky cast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Spoiler Paul Newman is also back with unused dialogue from the first Edited June 12, 2017 by John Marston 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Hunt Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Just now, John Marston said: can you spoiler tag that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Just now, Ethan Hunt said: can you spoiler tag that? sure but it is revealed in a trailer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Quote So, I now live in a world in which I liked a Cars movie. (I should add, if you’re not a fan of Larry the Cable Guy’s Mater, well, you are in luck because he’s barely in it.) Who knew that adding some emotional weight and unconsciously using some themes from Rocky III could add a little much needed depth and humanity to these sentient automobiles? http://uproxx.com/movies/cars-3-review/2/ lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 I'm legit lol-ing at Mater's role being significantly reduced in this. They really took the criticisms against Cars 2 to heart, didn't they? 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AniNate Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 One bad review from Screen Daily but otherwise things are looking pretty solid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJaros Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Let's face it: Cars 3's box office is almost irrelevant. It's an advertisement booster for the Cars merchandising empire. And i'm someone who liked Cars well enough, and think Cars 2 is underrated. Edited June 12, 2017 by SteveJaros 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Honestly, this sounds kinda interesting from what I read. Hoping it's not mediocrity like Dory or MU or, god forbid, TGD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Starts with a 64 on MC with 8 reviews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAR Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) 36 minutes ago, filmlover said: I'm legit lol-ing at Mater's role being significantly reduced in this. They really took the criticisms against Cars 2 to heart, didn't they? THey have some smart people up in Emeryville. Glad to hear it's good. Cars 2 is the only Pixar film I don't own. I have Good Dinosaur but it's still in it's wrapping Edited June 12, 2017 by DAR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Panda Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Decent reviews for a Pixar movie means it's a bad movie in my books. Thankfully we'll get Coco in November to make up for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric the IF Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 6 minutes ago, The Mummified Panda said: Decent reviews for a Pixar movie means it's a bad movie in my books. Thankfully we'll get Coco in November to make up for this. 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCsoft Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Well, good to know that it's not terrible, I tend to be very forgiving when it comes to Pixar films Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AniNate Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 1 hour ago, The Mummified Panda said: Decent reviews for a Pixar movie means it's a bad movie in my books. Thankfully we'll get Coco in November to make up for this. Eh, it's still better than getting trashed. The ship has sailed on debating whether this franchise is worthy of Pixar's time and resources and I'd rather be glad they at least made something watchable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Empire Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Happily surprised this is getting good reviews! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonwo Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 18 minutes ago, tribefan695 said: Eh, it's still better than getting trashed. The ship has sailed on debating whether this franchise is worthy of Pixar's time and resources and I'd rather be glad they at least made something watchable I think had it not been a monster cash cow merchandise wise. I suspect Disney and Pixar wouldn't have bothered with sequels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain H Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Nice to see this getting decent reviews. Anything over 60% in RT and 50 in MC is all that I ask for. Also finally watched Cars 2 and TGD out of sheer boredom and Cars 2 is actually alright?? Maybe a bit obnoxious at times, but overall it's competent. The Good Dinosaur is, well, good. Nothing special but I'll take it over 90% of the shit that other animation studios crapped out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
