stephanos13 Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 (edited) It's a Steven Soderbregh film, reviews don't matter. Edited February 21, 2018 by stephanos13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 Just now, stephanos13 said: It's a film? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephanos13 Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Just now, That One Guy said: film? my laptop froze and posted the reply early Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Gittes Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, That One Guy said: film? Edited February 21, 2018 by Jake Gittes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Gittes Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 55 minutes ago, Jake Gittes said: Typical, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLAM! Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 I checked the updated rotten tomatoes score, and this film was surprisingly able to jumo up to an acceptable 72% with 18 critical reviews! It's exciting to me that the film is as well received as it is! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 I love the trailer. Looks like a good horror movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrycaul Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 Dunno. Soderbergh fan. I like it when he experiments. I've paid before to see movies shot on phones. This one looks terrible to me, visually and storywise. As a completist, I'll watch it, but on vod or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TombRaider Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 not saying it'll be bad but how is this going wide, looks like straight to VOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatree Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 1 hour ago, TombRaider said: looks like straight to VOD See: every Steven Soderbergh movie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 I guess we're seeing different trailers. I love the feel of it, the look and the idea behind it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el sid Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 I expected due to the low weekend predictions a strange niche film but the trailer looked very interesting and well played. Now I understand why presales are not too bad. Since horror films still overperform (lately with Strangers 2 ) and this film has fine reviews and will get more than 2.000 theaters, why not predict an OW closer to 10M? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 This just looks so unappealing to me. Can’t pinpoint why though. Will maybe watch on Netflix in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 58 minutes ago, el sid said: I expected due to the low weekend predictions a strange niche film but the trailer looked very interesting and well played. Now I understand why presales are not too bad. Since horror films still overperform (lately with Strangers 2 ) and this film has fine reviews and will get more than 2.000 theaters, why not predict an OW closer to 10M? Yeah, these presales+the big jump on RT are making me think it could open around Logan Lucky's level. The same PTA as Strangers will get it to 8.4M. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLAM! Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 Bleecker Street knows what they're doing for sure. I think they've been marketing this pretty well for what it is, and I think a small portion of the general horror audience might be interested in this too. I think they might already be releasing this film at a win (as opposed to releasing it at a loss) just because the film was a cheap production. Good reviews certainly help too! They usually can't hurt, that's for sure! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 Double Toasted absolutely loved this, and they were pretty down on Logan Lucky 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieGuyKyle17 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Of course my local theater got the new Pure Flex film but doesn't get this. I guess Pacific Rim 2 and try to catch up on some other films. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Logan Lucky was absolutely horrible in every way. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aabattery Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Logan Lucky was absolutely incredible in every way. (Alright, maybe not Swank) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...