Jump to content

the beast

Weekend Thread - Insidious 29.6M, Jumanji 37.2M, TLJ 23.7M, TGS 13.8M, PP3 10.3

Recommended Posts

If I had to pick the five best acting performances by a female this year, Robbie would make that list, easily.  She was terrific in I, Tonya.  Chastain as well.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



 

 

Digging Deeper!

 

 

I really didn't want to post because I'm a reader, however, I did find an actual FORBES article regarding the 800 million.

 

I guess we should be fair, I'm sure TLJ's numbers would be similar. 

 

I got the link from here and dug further......     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_The_Last_Jedi#cite_note-97

Box office

As of January 4, 2018, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has grossed $549 million in the United States and Canada, and $573.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $1.122 billion.[6] It had a worldwide opening of $450.8 million, the fifth-biggest of all time, including $40.6 million that was attributed to IMAX screenings, the second biggest for IMAX.[95][96] It was estimated that the film would needed to have grossed $800 million worldwide to break even.[97]

 

Ofcourse, LOL, its Wikipedia break even.[97]

 

However, looking further, they got the info from a FORBES article. FORBES is reputable.

 

 

LINK! https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2017/12/12/review-star-wars-the-last-jedi-is-a-gloomier-flawed-but-ultimately-successful-sequel/#60d6e29a2e79

 

But keep in mind, "underperformance" at $1.3-1.399 billion wouldn't mean it's a "financial failure," since break-even point for this movie is somewhere around $800 million (budget plus global marketing etc being in the vicinity of $400 million, and the studio getting roughly half of the box office receipts, to oversimplify a bit). Underperforming just means it plays lower than expected and lower than it probably should have and could have. I don't expect that to happen at all, mind you, I'm just noting for the record where that line sits and why it doesn't mean "failure."

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chad Stevens
  • Like 11
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chad Stevens said:

 

 

Digging Deeper!

 

 

I really didn't want to post because I'm a reader, however, I did find an actual FORBES article regarding the 800 million.

 

I guess we should be fair, I'm sure TLJ's numbers would be similar. 

 

I got the link from here and dug further......     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_The_Last_Jedi#cite_note-97

Box office

As of January 4, 2018, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has grossed $549 million in the United States and Canada, and $573.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $1.122 billion.[6] It had a worldwide opening of $450.8 million, the fifth-biggest of all time, including $40.6 million that was attributed to IMAX screenings, the second biggest for IMAX.[95][96] It was estimated that the film would needed to have grossed $800 million worldwide to break even.[97]

 

Ofcourse, LOL, its wikipedia

 

However, looking further, they got the info from a FORBES article. FORBES is reputable.

 

 

LINK! https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2017/12/12/review-star-wars-the-last-jedi-is-a-gloomier-flawed-but-ultimately-successful-sequel/#60d6e29a2e79

 

But keep in mind, "underperformance" at $1.3-1.399 billion wouldn't mean it's a "financial failure," since break-even point for this movie is somewhere around $800 million (budget plus global marketing etc being in the vicinity of $400 million, and the studio getting roughly half of the box office receipts, to oversimplify a bit). Underperforming just means it plays lower than expected and lower than it probably should have and could have. I don't expect that to happen at all, mind you, I'm just noting for the record where that line sits and why it doesn't mean "failure."

 

 

 

 

 

Nah, we want you to post:)...I swear, most of us don't bite, and we love to read well-researched posts (and hilarious comedy ones, too:)...

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



6 minutes ago, Chad Stevens said:

 

 

Digging Deeper!

 

 

I really didn't want to post because I'm a reader, however, I did find an actual FORBES article regarding the 800 million.

 

I guess we should be fair, I'm sure TLJ's numbers would be similar. 

 

I got the link from here and dug further......     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_The_Last_Jedi#cite_note-97

Box office

As of January 4, 2018, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has grossed $549 million in the United States and Canada, and $573.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $1.122 billion.[6] It had a worldwide opening of $450.8 million, the fifth-biggest of all time, including $40.6 million that was attributed to IMAX screenings, the second biggest for IMAX.[95][96] It was estimated that the film would needed to have grossed $800 million worldwide to break even.[97]

 

Ofcourse, LOL, its wikipedia

 

However, looking further, they got the info from a FORBES article. FORBES is reputable.

 

 

LINK! https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2017/12/12/review-star-wars-the-last-jedi-is-a-gloomier-flawed-but-ultimately-successful-sequel/#60d6e29a2e79

 

But keep in mind, "underperformance" at $1.3-1.399 billion wouldn't mean it's a "financial failure," since break-even point for this movie is somewhere around $800 million (budget plus global marketing etc being in the vicinity of $400 million, and the studio getting roughly half of the box office receipts, to oversimplify a bit). Underperforming just means it plays lower than expected and lower than it probably should have and could have. I don't expect that to happen at all, mind you, I'm just noting for the record where that line sits and why it doesn't mean "failure."

 

 

 

 

 

800M+ budget+marketing (that's what he is insisting in) is absolutely not the same than 800M to break even (even when Disney made a deal with theaters so Disney could get a bigger share than normal dom ... i would say those 800M could be less to break even)

Edited by meriodejaneiro
Link to comment
Share on other sites



With an Insidious Chapter 3 multiplier:

 

12.7

9.2

5.6

= 27.5 OW

 

Not the likeliest multiplier to happen, since Insidious 3 was a Summer movie and had a smaller Thursday preview (1.55, rather than the 2 that Insidious 4 conjured up), but still, a 25M-26M opening would be great.

 

The movie also has a decent shot at being the 2nd biggest film in the franchise with that opening (Insidious 1 is #2 right now at 54M). Even a Happy Death Day multiplier would almost get it there, and as frontloaded as The Last Key is going to be, it may not be HDD frontloaded, I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chad Stevens said:

 

 

Digging Deeper!

 

 

I really didn't want to post because I'm a reader, however, I did find an actual FORBES article regarding the 800 million.

 

I guess we should be fair, I'm sure TLJ's numbers would be similar. 

 

I got the link from here and dug further......     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_The_Last_Jedi#cite_note-97

Box office

As of January 4, 2018, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has grossed $549 million in the United States and Canada, and $573.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $1.122 billion.[6] It had a worldwide opening of $450.8 million, the fifth-biggest of all time, including $40.6 million that was attributed to IMAX screenings, the second biggest for IMAX.[95][96] It was estimated that the film would needed to have grossed $800 million worldwide to break even.[97]

 

Ofcourse, LOL, its Wikipedia break even.[97]

 

However, looking further, they got the info from a FORBES article. FORBES is reputable.

 

 

LINK! https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2017/12/12/review-star-wars-the-last-jedi-is-a-gloomier-flawed-but-ultimately-successful-sequel/#60d6e29a2e79

 

But keep in mind, "underperformance" at $1.3-1.399 billion wouldn't mean it's a "financial failure," since break-even point for this movie is somewhere around $800 million (budget plus global marketing etc being in the vicinity of $400 million, and the studio getting roughly half of the box office receipts, to oversimplify a bit). Underperforming just means it plays lower than expected and lower than it probably should have and could have. I don't expect that to happen at all, mind you, I'm just noting for the record where that line sits and why it doesn't mean "failure."

 

 

 

 

 

See, at least you provided something with a bit more of a foundation to it. Hughes is a believable source. Also, start posting more here. You already added more to the conversation than Forceuser has since he started posting here.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, That One Guy said:

ayyy

 

TheForceuser707 - (1/6/18) - Suspended for one month for repeatedly trolling and poisoning the well in a hostile manner

 

125dfbbb1bdf15ba7f2b4461641d7903902eca47

  • Like 4
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites



There's no way anyone in Hollywood would even hint at a movie costing 800m, and I doubt someone at Kennedy's level would mention any costs at all ever.

Edited by MattW
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



9 minutes ago, meriodejaneiro said:

Is the bad weather affecting weekend box office numbers dom? or they are in line with what was expected?

Everything except Jedi is higher than expected, but as @TwoMisfits has pointed out, schools being out due to weather yesterday may have inflated Friday more than would have been usual. We shall see when Saturday stuff comes in if course. 

 

Jedi is again playing to the lowest of expectations preweekend but at least imo it's not unexpected. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, TheForceuser707 said:

Based upon? The quality of the movie? Past victories? Let's be clear. TLJ is a complete disaster. It doesn't matter how you want to look at it. It made money off the back of all of the previous installments in the saga. It is the only movie in history to drop $150M+ between two consecutive weekends, and if you discount its OW numbers it has made around $250M DOM. How much of that was also curiosity based on brand name or the previous installment cannot be quantified. TLJ isn't a successful movie. It has the lowest audience rating of any Star Wars movie. Its revenues are the result of excessive marketing, goodwill on the brand name Star Wars, and expectation generated by The Force Awakens. Proof is already available if you look at what has happened in China. This movie is TRAILING BEHIND ROGUE ONE there... on its OW, beaten by a local "romance" movie which has been out for a whole week already.

 

TLJ may not ever break even!

 

It's going to get pushed down to third place in its third week of release.

 

What more do you need to hear?

 

 

 

 

Bozo's_Circus_1968.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Spoiler

 

5 minutes ago, titanic2187 said:
TD YD Title (Click to View) Studio Daily Gross % +/- YD / LW Theaters / Avg Gross To-Date Day
1 - Insidious: The Last Key Uni. $12,743,000 - - 3,116 $4,090 $12,743,000 1
2 1 Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle Sony $10,800,000 +79% -39% 3,801 $2,841 $219,172,666 17
3 2 Star Wars: The Last Jedi BV $6,584,000 +51% -65% 4,232 $1,556 $555,546,602 22
4 3 The Greatest Showman Fox $4,175,000 +75% -22% 3,342 $1,249 $67,279,372 17
5 4 Pitch Perfect 3 Uni. $3,320,000 +72% -50% 3,458 $960 $79,077,090 15
6 - Molly's Game STX $2,280,000 +652% +209% 1,608 $1,418 $9,496,560 12
7 5 Ferdinand Fox $2,255,000 +50% -50% 3,156 $715 $65,024,118 22
8 7 Darkest Hour Focus $1,830,000 +176% +5% 1,733 $1,056 $23,866,107 45
9 6 Coco BV $1,543,000 +40% -46% 1,894 $815 $188,085,961 45
10 8 All the Money in the World TriS $1,050,000 +77% -40% 2,123 $495 $17,631,909 12
11 10 The Shape of Water FoxS $845,000 +81% -28% 804 $1,051 $19,398,464 36
12 11 Wonder LGF $751,000 +74% -39% 1,258 $597 $125,008,086 50
- 9 Downsizing Par. $654,000 +37% -59% 2,020 $324 $21,384,118 15
- - The Post Fox $496,267 +757% +189% 36 $13,785 $2,645,923 15
- 12 Father Figures WB $380,000 +18% -69% 1,717 $221 $15,890,460 15
- - Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri FoxS $187,000 +96% -11% 310 $603 $24,874,714 57
- - Thor: Ragnarok BV $161,000 +29% -48% 325 $495 $312,105,786 64
- - Justice League WB $160,000 +17% -63% 518 $309 $226,635,639 50
- - Daddy's Home 2 Par. $135,000 +44% -57% 429 $315 $102,596,502 57
- - Murder on the Orient Express (2017) Fox $133,000 +74% -36% 391 $340 $101,238,135 57
- - Hostiles ENTMP $87,000 +1,129% +723% 46 $1,891 $212,192 15
- - Marshall ORF $1,539 -3% -53% 41 $38 $9,476,811 85

 

 

 

Thor over Justice League :hahaha:

Edited by weresweresweres
  • Like 4
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites





2 hours ago, FantasticBeasts said:

I was just wondering, do we know which is the most liked post in BOT's history?

 

It was Shawn's retirement post

Then I think it was Tele's post where he was mocking Ijack

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





7 minutes ago, narniadis said:

Everything except Jedi is higher than expected, but as @TwoMisfits has pointed out, schools being out due to weather yesterday may have inflated Friday more than would have been usual. We shall see when Saturday stuff comes in if course. 

 

Jedi is again playing to the lowest of expectations preweekend but at least imo it's not unexpected. 

 

Numbers seem pretty good with the crappy weather. But it’s true yesterday was not a normal Friday. Deadline says 87% of colleges were off and 40% of K-12 schools were out. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 hour ago, MattW said:

Yeah, deadline estimated TFA's total costs at 775m and total revenues at 1560m, rogue one 515 and 835 respectively. That's including all post theatrical costs and revenues as well.

 

http://deadline.com/2016/03/star-wars-the-force-awakens-movie-profit-2015-lucasfilm-disney-1201726142/

 

http://deadline.com/2017/04/rogue-one-box-office-profit-2016-1202054697/

 

(Though I think they're underestimating theatrical revenues given what we know about Disney taking 65% of domestic box office)

Using those numbers from TFA and RO, guessing for TLJ:

 

Movie TFA RO TLJ TLJ Notes
Theatrical 945 486.5 645 630*0.65 + 710*0.33
Non-Theatrical 612 349 401 guesstimate
TOTAL REVENUE 1557 835.5 1046  
Production 259 200 300 could be lower
Release 185 160 200 guesstimate
Tele/Entertainment 145 59 160 guesstimate
Participation 100 35 75 smaller cast than TFA, no JJ
Residuals 43.5 28 50 small bump from TFA
Interests/Overhead 44 34 50 small bump from TFA
TOTAL COST 776.5 516 835 guesses ended up > '800+'
PROFIT 780.5 319.5 211 conservative estimate
Edited by a2knet
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.