Jump to content

Eric Loves Rey

Renfield | April 14, 2023 | Universal | Nicolas Hoult stars | About Dracula's henchman | NICOLAS CAGE IS DRACULA

Recommended Posts





On 4/10/2023 at 11:02 AM, thajdikt said:

20M OW possible?

 

20M would be great but I am expecting midteens opening, as BOpro suggests. Not enough tracking data for this, though

 

70M SMB

15M Renfield

10M Suzume

8M Air

8M JW4

8M D&D

7M Pope Exorcist

3M Mafia Mamma

2M Nefarius

2M Scream

 

130M+ top10

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



5 hours ago, stripe said:

 

20M would be great but I am expecting midteens opening, as BOpro suggests. Not enough tracking data for this, though

 

70M SMB

15M Renfield

10M Suzume

8M Air

8M JW4

8M D&D

7M Pope Exorcist

3M Mafia Mamma

2M Nefarius

2M Scream

 

130M+ top10

very optimistic on that 10M for suzume

Link to comment
Share on other sites





9 minutes ago, Krissykins said:

Variety confirmed the $65m budget. Wonder why they spent so much on this, seems risky. 
 

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/box-office-super-mario-bros-movie-nicolas-cage-renfield-projections-1235579707/

From the initial announcements it sounds like they were hoping for this to be a Kingsman-ish small-scale action franchise for them rather than a horror movie, hence the elevated budget. Not sure if they'll get there - I don't think it opens to 10m but it seems to have missed its shot at a huge breakout opening - but that was seemingly the hope. 

 

Universal Monster movies are also weirdly big overseas (Drac Untold made 150m internationally!) So that was probably also part of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



25 minutes ago, Rageofthegods said:

From the initial announcements it sounds like they were hoping for this to be a Kingsman-ish small-scale action franchise for them rather than a horror movie, hence the elevated budget. Not sure if they'll get there - I don't think it opens to 10m but it seems to have missed its shot at a huge breakout opening - but that was seemingly the hope. 

 

Universal Monster movies are also weirdly big overseas (Drac Untold made 150m internationally!) So that was probably also part of it. 

They were moving away from the Dracula Untolds and into more The Invisible Man territory, which cost $7m to make. 
 

I’m surprised they seemingly dropped the ball on this one, by not keeping the budget in line. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Krissykins said:

They were moving away from the Dracula Untolds and into more The Invisible Man territory, which cost $7m to make. 
 

I’m surprised they seemingly dropped the ball on this one, by not keeping the budget in line. 

Doesn't have to be either/or. Their strategy wasn't that they'll only make Invisible Man from here on out, it's just that they'll take pitches from anyone and let the filmmaker/producer do what they want if they like the pitch. Right now, they're developing a bigger budget Van Helsing movie with the Overlord director as well. The nice thing about that approach is they can theoretically do both Blumhouse movies and a bigger budget movie like this.

 

If this movie bombs, the lesson might be that they misjudged the audience; instead of audiences seeing it as an action-comedy with horror elements, they probably see a wacky horror-comedy with some action bits sprinkled in, and that has a fundamentally lower ceiling. The budget makes sense if you see it as Universal trying to launch a medium-scale action-comedy franchise a la Kingsman. 

Edited by Rageofthegods
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



9 minutes ago, Rageofthegods said:

Doesn't have to be either/or. Their strategy wasn't that they'll only make Invisible Man from here on out, it's just that they'll take pitches from anyone and let the filmmaker/producer do what they want if they like the pitch. Right now, they're developing a bigger budget Van Helsing movie with the Overlord director as well. The nice thing about that approach is they can theoretically do both Blumhouse movies and a bigger budget movie like this.

 

If this movie bombs, the lesson might be that they misjudged the audience; instead of audiences seeing it as an action-comedy with horror elements, they probably see a wacky horror-comedy with some action bits sprinkled in, and that has a fundamentally lower ceiling. The budget makes sense if you see it as Universal trying to launch a medium-scale action-comedy franchise a la Kingsman. 

I just disagree with most of this. Horror comedy with Nicolas Cage isn’t having as much mainstream appeals as Kinsgman. He isn’t a draw. Expecting this to make $150-200m when they greenlit with that budget just sounds like they’ve completely misjudged it from the get go. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



17 minutes ago, Krissykins said:

I just disagree with most of this. Horror comedy with Nicolas Cage isn’t having as much mainstream appeals as Kinsgman. He isn’t a draw. Expecting this to make $150-200m when they greenlit with that budget just sounds like they’ve completely misjudged it from the get go. 

Not disagreeing but that seems to have been Universal's thinking. From this article:

 

"While Universal is developing a handful of high-profile monster pics including Wolfman starring Ryan Gosling and Van Helsing pic with James Wan producing, the studio has been high on this project since getting the first draft. While the character isn’t the flashiest among its other monster IPs, insiders say the story’s mix of humor and action was something the studios was looking to have more of because so many of the other properties have a more horror element to them like Universal’s box office hit The Invisible Man."

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I'm not sure why audiences would think this is wacky horror when the trailers have been making it as obvious as can be that this is a comedy. There isn't even anything scary in any of the trailers.

 

Truthfully it just looked lame from the start and the soon-to-be rotten score doesn't exactly do much to change my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



65M budget kinda doomed this from the start. This is the type of movie that does 20-30M OS. Even with a solid 50-60M DOM run, a 65M budget still makes it look like a big flop. This shouldn't have cost no more than 30-35M like Cocaine Bear.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



13 hours ago, CJohn said:

65M budget kinda doomed this from the start. This is the type of movie that does 20-30M OS. Even with a solid 50-60M DOM run, a 65M budget still makes it look like a big flop. This shouldn't have cost no more than 30-35M like Cocaine Bear.

Well I don't think it will affect Comcast too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites







Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.