CHARLIE'S ANGELS | 15 NOVEMBER 2019 | Sony | Elizabeth Banks directing. Kristen Stewart, Naomi Scott, Ella Balinska

[Zakiyyah6]

8 hours ago, TombRaider said:

if ghostbusters flopped and ocean's 8 underperformed with great casts this will FLOP.

Oceans 8 did fine. 

[EliasChristensen]

Still not feeling anything for this. They could cancel it right now and I wouldn't mind. 

 

I would have been all on board for an all-male-meta-reboot but this seems so lame that I rather watch the 80s series again. 

[CoolioD1]

6 hours ago, TombRaider said:

kstew unknown?  and after aladdin naomi wont be either

[TombRaider]

7 hours ago, Zakiyyah6 said:

Oceans 8 did fine. 

flopped overseas

[Joel M]

1 hour ago, TombRaider said:

flopped overseas

 

156M is flopping because the old Ocean's movies made more? If you say so.

[Valonqar]

People don't like KStew (undeserved but facts are facts) and Twilight fans stopped caring ever since she cucked RPatz with the married director. So Naomi is literally this movie's only hope and that depends on Aladdin reception. PStew (shit joke I know) is a good choice for Bosley, though.

Edited September 18, 2018 by Valonqar

[Barnack]

7 hours ago, TombRaider said:

flopped overseas

Foreign: $156,100,000 (Cloudy 2 made 139m in International revenues with is 154.5m intl no China performance)

Rumored budget: 70m

 

I get having doubt on the rumored budget, but if it is close to the truth it more than doubled it's budget oversea without a China release. 

 

If that is flopping oversea what did Equalizer 2 did, bombed WW ?

[TombRaider]

46 minutes ago, Barnack said:

Foreign: $156,100,000 (Cloudy 2 made 139m in International revenues with is 154.5m intl no China performance) 

Rumored budget: 70m

 

I get having doubt on the rumored budget, but if it is close to the truth it more than doubled it's budget oversea without a China release. 

 

If that is flopping oversea what did Equalizer 2 did, bombed WW ?

did Equalizer have 3 A-list actresses on it and was a sequel to a very succesful franchise?

[dxmatrixdt]

cannot believe Kristen Stewart is in this!  After I added her my avatar, I noticed Lizzie opened up.  complete coincidence btw...  

I'm not sure if they would do wire acrobatics in this version though

[Barnack]

16 minutes ago, TombRaider said:

did Equalizer have 3 A-list actresses on it and was a sequel to a very succesful franchise?

No Equalizer didn't had A-list actress.

 

Ocean 8 was a reboot (the little sharing the same name/cameo is close to irrelevant) not really a sequel and was a world cup release.

 

It is more on the underperforming side OS to not reach a 40/60, not even a clean 45/55, not a flop for a small production mid budget.

[The Futurist]

What would be Korn in 2019 ?

[Mojoguy]

i actually think it's really cool that they're giving three unknowns a shot at leading roles in this, even if it doesn't pay off at the box office.

It has more to do with a cheap cast than giving anyone "a shot".

Which is fine cause most superhero lead actors are never super popular in the first place.

[dxmatrixdt]

10 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

What would be Korn in 2019 ?

Korn likely progressed/changed each album like Thrice 😁

Korn 2019 could be Korn 2019

Edited September 18, 2018 by dXairdryZid

[TLK]

8 hours ago, Valonqar said:

People don't like KStew (undeserved but facts are facts) and Twilight fans stopped caring ever since she cucked RPatz with the married director. So Naomi is literally this movie's only hope and that depends on Aladdin reception. PStew (shit joke I know) is a good choice for Bosley, though.

That's not how it works. If they make a decent movie and market it well, it will make money. The general public's love/hate for actors is so over-rated that it is funny. It is mostly IP and the quality of work that determines how a movie will perform. Stephen King's It was a TV mini-series that they re-booted with a bunch of unknown actors and it made more money than any non-existing IP, purely star vehicle in the 21st century.

[TombRaider]

3 hours ago, TLK said:

That's not how it works. If they make a decent movie and market it well, it will make money. The general public's love/hate for actors is so over-rated that it is funny. It is mostly IP and the quality of work that determines how a movie will perform. Stephen King's It was a TV mini-series that they re-booted with a bunch of unknown actors and it made more money than any non-existing IP, purely star vehicle in the 21st century.

unless you're katherine heigl, then your movie is doomed.

[Mojoguy]

unless you're katherine heigl, then your movie is doomed.

Your movie is doomed especially if it has katherine heigl in it.

[dxmatrixdt]

/

Edited February 19, 2019 by Slave Animal Rights

[Hatebox]

7 hours ago, dXairdryZid said:

surprised Kristen Stewart got this role. 

After Twilight, it seemed she held onto most of her personality, therefore maybe making independent films instead of family friendly mainstream movies???

Elizabeth Banks probably pitched her a feminist subversion take on the property. 

 

(I'm not saying that cynically, it's as good as any other reason to make a blockbuster.)

[75Live]

Kristen Stewart may be the only reason I ever see this movie...on HBO or wherever it shows up 😛 

[Valonqar]

KStew is gorgeous, though. They played her perfume commercial during some TV shit I watched but forgot what and she is absolutely stunning. Too bad that she carries that butch look in real life, she's very Elfin actually.