Jump to content

franfar

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 | May 5, 2023 | The 9th most profitable film of 2023

Recommended Posts



9 hours ago, CaptNathanBrittles said:

 

Batman Returns was a 12s at the cinema. It was upgraded to 15s for video. Same with the first one.

Ah I didn’t realise, the 12 back then was different from the 12A we have now. ie no one under 12, even if accompanied. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



11 hours ago, RobrtmanAStarWarsReference said:

Yeah, I remember a video of some 🤓 kid saying he shouldn't been allowed to watch and WB should be ashamed lol

 

Yeah. This dweeb. It's like these people didn't recall Joker electrocuting a guy to death and cackling while said guy was frying. Or, when he impaled a dude's neck with a quill. Or, that he dumped acid on models faces then threw them out windows when he was bored with them. Those are just some of things that happen in Batman '89.

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites





23 minutes ago, ThomasNicole said:

82% with 298 reviews 

 

Hilarious that unlike most MCU movies this one started very high, then faced a huge drop and is growing steadily since

That happened with Vol. 2 as well from what I recall. 

Edited by WittyUsername
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

pretty good but definitely my third favourite guardians movie. a lot of threads and none of them tied up as resonant as they could have for me. a couple of the endings some of the characters got just had me like "uhhh, yeah sure i guess"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



I think the day when 150 is the expected opening for every blockbuster are past.

That streaming has made deep inroads in theater going is now beyond debate.

I saw the film..loved it Easily the b est MCU film since Endgame.

Now anxious to see what Gunn does with Superman.

  • Like 1
  • Heart 2
  • Haha 1
  • ...wtf 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2023 at 8:00 PM, WittyUsername said:

Maybe it’s just me, but when people talked about how intense the animal cruelty in this movie is, I have to be honest, I was kind of expecting something more graphic. Yeah, there’s definitely animal cruelty here, but people made it made me think we’d be shown more than we were. 

It's done more by suggestion then actully showing it. Gunn left most of the cruelty to Rocket to the viewers imagination...which probably caused images more horrific then anything Gunn could have put on the screen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 hours ago, ThomasNicole said:

82% with 298 reviews 

 

Hilarious that unlike most MCU movies this one started very high, then faced a huge drop and is growing steadily since

 

Is it possible recently critics are giving more positive reviews to align with the stellar audience reaction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, grey ghost said:

 

Is it possible recently critics are giving more positive reviews to align with the stellar audience reaction?

Yeah, it was the top critics that was dragging the overall % down since the beginning 

 

It´s just more clear now that the top critics are over so there´s way more positives getting in

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites





3 hours ago, ThomasNicole said:

82% with 298 reviews 

 

Hilarious that unlike most MCU movies this one started very high, then faced a huge drop and is growing steadily since

 

2 hours ago, WittyUsername said:

That happened with Vol. 2 as well from what I recall. 

 

Been a while, but something similar happened with Rogue One.  Started high, dipped more than a bit (thanks in part to an atrocious NYC critics screening), and then recovered back to the mid 80s.   Happened toward the start of its run so it was largely overshadowed, plus being a late review drop everything was compressed, but still one of the stranger RT watches I saw unfold in real time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, Porthos said:

 

 

Been a while, but something similar happened with Rogue One.  Started high, dipped more than a bit (thanks in part to an atrocious NYC critics screening), and then recovered back to the mid 80s.   Happened toward the start of its run so it was largely overshadowed, plus being a late review drop everything was compressed, but still one of the stranger RT watches I saw unfold in real time.

Why was the nyc screening atrocious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 minutes ago, RobrtmanAStarWarsReference said:

Why was the nyc screening atrocious?

 

To this day, I have no idea!  Just for some reason the NYC critics disproportionately didn't like it compared to most every other critic screening.  Maybe something was in the water/soda that day!

 

(or random distribution is random, but that's no fun)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites









Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.