Pinacolada Posted Monday at 02:31 AM Share Posted Monday at 02:31 AM 22 minutes ago, Blaze Heatnix said: It seems we have the first reaction He's from digitalspy Yeah this movie's gonna need a lot of these kind of reactions tomorrow 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leoh Posted Monday at 03:16 AM Share Posted Monday at 03:16 AM 1 hour ago, Blaze Heatnix said: Social reactions coming tomorrow, it seems. What?! this early?! Sony confident is def good news ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattage Posted Monday at 03:18 AM Share Posted Monday at 03:18 AM 1 hour ago, Skim Beeble said: can't wait to watch my favorite couple on screen again this weekend. My favorite couple on screen for the last time 🖤 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lorddemaxus Posted Monday at 04:05 AM Share Posted Monday at 04:05 AM 48 minutes ago, leoh said: What?! this early?! Sony confident is def good news ! The Monday before release isn’t early for social media reactions lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Train Posted Monday at 04:07 AM Share Posted Monday at 04:07 AM It's crazy how they've made 3 Venom movies and he fought Spider-Man in 0 of them. If Sony was smart, they would have him fight Andrew's Spider-Man in this one to give it an actual hook. That would guarantee a big OW. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadOlCatSylvester Posted Monday at 06:06 AM Share Posted Monday at 06:06 AM 1 hour ago, Bob Train said: It's crazy how they've made 3 Venom movies and he fought Spider-Man in 0 of them. If Sony was smart, they would have him fight Andrew's Spider-Man in this one to give it an actual hook. That would guarantee a big OW. The big problem with that is that Marvel has proven time and again that they do not want Sony's live-action movies to feature Spider-Man. They don't want any other competing versions of the character in that medium at least. Between the old rumours of them demanding Tom Holland's lawyer friendly cameo be cut from the first Venom, and them kicking Venom out of the MCU as soon as they could, Marvel's thoughts on a Spider-Man vs Venom movie are abundantly clear. That's why they should have saved Carnage for this movie instead of wasting him in the last one. Sadly, Sony prioritized short-term hype for longevity, and now they are about to pay the price. At least they're smart enough to just end the series now instead of dragging it on any longer. Oh, and before you ask, I do not buy any of the current rumours surrounding Spider-Man 4 at all. Not at this stage. And I've made it clear above why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leoh Posted Monday at 09:24 AM Share Posted Monday at 09:24 AM 3 hours ago, BadOlCatSylvester said: The big problem with that is that Marvel has proven time and again that they do not want Sony's live-action movies to feature Spider-Man. They don't want any other competing versions of the character in that medium at least. Between the old rumours of them demanding Tom Holland's lawyer friendly cameo be cut from the first Venom, and them kicking Venom out of the MCU as soon as they could, Marvel's thoughts on a Spider-Man vs Venom movie are abundantly clear. That's why they should have saved Carnage for this movie instead of wasting him in the last one. Sadly, Sony prioritized short-term hype for longevity, and now they are about to pay the price. At least they're smart enough to just end the series now instead of dragging it on any longer. Oh, and before you ask, I do not buy any of the current rumours surrounding Spider-Man 4 at all. Not at this stage. And I've made it clear above why. I guess your reaction when you find out Marvel has no control over Spider-Man. which is cinematically an exclusive Sony property. So it’s more likely that Sony simply avoids overusing spider-man in their other live action Marvel projects just to avoid avoid any character fatigue. Same reason why they do not allow MCU to use Sony Marvel characters that already have their own movies. Jon Wats already revealed this in an interview. Now with Venom franchise conclusion, they probably will use the Symbiote in MCU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Max007 Posted Monday at 01:20 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:20 PM The success of first Venom really made Sony over confident thinking people will also show up for stuff like Morbius and Kraven without any Spider-Man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted Monday at 01:34 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:34 PM Sony must be so happy they moved Venon from Nov to Oct, especially with Joker bombing. They have 4 weeks of zero competition just because other studios were too scared of putting movies against Trump election news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WittyUsername Posted Monday at 02:53 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:53 PM 8 hours ago, BadOlCatSylvester said: The big problem with that is that Marvel has proven time and again that they do not want Sony's live-action movies to feature Spider-Man. They don't want any other competing versions of the character in that medium at least. Between the old rumours of them demanding Tom Holland's lawyer friendly cameo be cut from the first Venom, and them kicking Venom out of the MCU as soon as they could, Marvel's thoughts on a Spider-Man vs Venom movie are abundantly clear. That's why they should have saved Carnage for this movie instead of wasting him in the last one. Sadly, Sony prioritized short-term hype for longevity, and now they are about to pay the price. At least they're smart enough to just end the series now instead of dragging it on any longer. Oh, and before you ask, I do not buy any of the current rumours surrounding Spider-Man 4 at all. Not at this stage. And I've made it clear above why. I don’t see why Marvel would be able to dictate what Sony does with their own movies. Marvel doesn’t own the movie rights to Spider-Man. They are only allowed to use Spider-Man with Sony’s direct approval. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leoh Posted Monday at 02:57 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:57 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, Mad Max007 said: The success of first Venom really made Sony over confident thinking people will also show up for stuff like Morbius and Kraven without any Spider-Man. Morbius with 15% on RT open to almost 40 million. So people def showed up for Morbius. The problem was not that Morbius had no spider-man but instead the problem was that Morbius is a really bad movie. With good reception Morbius would have comfortably made around 50M ow I’d say and consequently good legs. And Morbius was a very obscure Spider-Man villain, many Marvel fans had never heard of Morbius before. On the other hand, Kraven is a well known Marvel character and known not only by Spider-Man fans, specially now after the success of spider-man 2 game; Kraven is also the main villain in one of the most famous Black Panther comics and also has iconic fights in Venom comic books, not to mention he is also part of X-Men universe storylines. The point is the movie has to be good, specially now that fans trust less in Sony than they did before Morbius and Madame Web. Edited Monday at 03:03 PM by leoh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnumbers Posted Monday at 05:20 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:20 PM (edited) Hopefully this movie even getting lower and showing Sony that even Venom is on diminishing returns is the death sign for this universe for Sony. My bad, shit-verse. I wouldn't mind to live in a world where Sony allowed Marvel to play with their characters as they see fit, always with previous communication and Sony just making animated movies. Rumors is that Sony is now developing Venom movie on animation form. They were also working on a Gwen movie. Maybe give another Spider character a movie series. Maybe Miguel or even Spider-Noir or whatever they want. I wouldn't mind to see Sony continuing to play on this animation form. Edited Monday at 05:21 PM by justnumbers 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Max007 Posted Monday at 05:38 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:38 PM When is the embargo lifting? They have been awfully silent more so than the last two times. It's opening in Europe and China in two days! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnumbers Posted Monday at 05:49 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:49 PM 10 minutes ago, Mad Max007 said: When is the embargo lifting? They have been awfully silent more so than the last two times. It's opening in Europe and China in two days! Wednesday afternoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Max007 Posted Monday at 10:59 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:59 PM Since 2018 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seto Kaiba Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Heatnix Posted yesterday at 01:23 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:23 AM Damn, this movie is actually getting good social reviews and reactions from critics! It's the inverse Joker effect! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leoh Posted yesterday at 01:24 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:24 AM 7 minutes ago, Seto Kaiba said: W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emoviefan Posted yesterday at 01:29 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:29 AM Needle moving time. Might have to give this one a shot. Was not a fan of the first two. Of course social media reactions yadda yadda . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grebacio Posted yesterday at 01:35 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:35 AM Predciting a 65-70 rotten tomatoes score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
