Jump to content

CJohn

SPECTRE | 11/6/15 | Final Trailer on Page 126! | Twitter reactions coming in, STID 2.0?

Recommended Posts



13 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

US opening is really weird, it s breaking records in plenty of other countries.

Skyfall was loved.

 

It seems americans are just waiting Star Wars to open or something.

 

It's opened under Skyfall in as many or maybe more countries than it's opened over. 

 

With Skyfall, I think in addition to year long publicity of Bond's 50th year, the 4 year break and Adele, the great reviews lured in an audience that normally doesn't go to Bond films.  They certainty weren't lured into coming on the heels of QOS.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



It's confirmed, Spectre did the best OD of all time in France. 850 297 admissions beating Spider-Man 3 and its 804 345 admissions. Both had the particularity to open on a holiday (Labor Day for Spider-Man and Armistice Day for Spectre) which helps them a lot for openings. Spectre did 265 461 admissions in previews on Tuesday 10th but it was starting really early (up to 5pm at some places) and was more of a early release than previews. Still it is officially counted in its first day so it has the record. 

Edited by Shaldun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION TO THE CURRENT PRICE OF $8.34:

 

GoldenEye - $204.1 million

Tomorrow Never Dies - $227.7 million

The World Is Not Enough - $208.4 million

Die Another Day - $231.0 million

Casino Royale - $213.2 million

Quantum - $195.6 million

Skyfall - $318.9 million

 

Other than Skyfall, do you notice a pattern? There's always been a ceiling on these movies. Hell, Connery's biggest was Thunderball at $525.1 million. You Only Live Twice, the next film, made $299.4 million. Moore's biggest was Moonraker at $233.6 million. For Your Eyes Only, the next film, made $164.4 million. There are always specific reasons why certain Bond films hit bigger than others. As many others have pointed out, Skyfall simply had so many things in its favor that Spectre didn't. The 50th anniversary, Adele's song and important for a series that skews much older, genuinely great reviews and word-of-mouth. 

 

This series has always ebbed and flowed.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 minutes ago, RichWS said:

ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION TO THE CURRENT PRICE OF $8.34:

 

GoldenEye - $204.1 million

Tomorrow Never Dies - $227.7 million

The World Is Not Enough - $208.4 million

Die Another Day - $231.0 million

Casino Royale - $213.2 million

Quantum - $195.6 million

Skyfall - $318.9 million

 

Other than Skyfall, do you notice a pattern? There's always been a ceiling on these movies. Hell, Connery's biggest was Thunderball at $525.1 million. You Only Live Twice, the next film, made $299.4 million. Moore's biggest was Moonraker at $233.6 million. For Your Eyes Only, the next film, made $164.4 million. There are always specific reasons why certain Bond films hit bigger than others. As many others have pointed out, Skyfall simply had so many things in its favor that Spectre didn't. The 50th anniversary, Adele's song and important for a series that skews much older, genuinely great reviews and word-of-mouth. 

 

This series has always ebbed and flowed.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if the next movie goes out in 3D in Asia and Latin America similar to what Furious 7 did. Bond is putting up bigger numbers than ever in those markets and I think EON and the next distributor will definitely feel they are leaving money on the table by not going out in those markets in 3D.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daily Domestic Chart for Wednesday November 11th, 2015

← Previous Chart Chart Index  
 
    Movie Distributor Gross Change Thtrs. Per Thtr. Total Gross Days
1 (1) Spectre Sony Pictures $7,915,302 +8% 3,929 $2,015   $90,957,011 6
2 (2) The Peanuts Movie 20th Century Fox $7,766,913 +154% 3,897 $1,993   $56,763,800 6
3 (3) The Martian 20th Century Fox $1,501,925 +43% 2,855 $526   $200,009,441 41
4 (5) Goosebumps Sony Pictures $1,429,740 +158% 3,051 $469   $68,550,558 27
5 (4) Bridge of Spies Walt Disney $935,556 +29% 2,767 $338   $56,860,606 27
6 (8) Hotel Transylvania 2 Sony Pictures $928,908 +227% 2,274 $408   $162,726,563 48
7 (6) Burnt Weinstein Co. $466,717 +5% 3,003 $155   $11,308,288 13
8 (7) The Last Witch Hunter Lionsgate $382,430 +28% 2,286 $167   $24,399,222 20
9 (9) The Intern Warner Bros. $290,178 +26% 1,071 $271   $71,993,948 48
10 (10) Our Brand is Crisis Warner Bros. $227,420 +6% 2,202 $103   $6,502,837 13
11 (11) Paranormal Activity: The Gh… Paramount Pictures $201,249 +3% 1,087 $185   $16,783,751 20
12 (12) Sicario Lionsgate $180,216 +22% 722 $250   $44,355,943 55
13 (14) Woodlawn Pure Flix Entertain… $179,432 +46% 922 $195   $12,892,338 27
14 (13) Crimson Peak Universal $169,160 +15% 1,131 $150   $30,252,690 27
15 (-) Pan Warner Bros. $160,154 +180% 508 $315   $33,199,110 34
- (15) Suffragette Focus Features $143,510 +36% 222 $646   $1,449,023 20
- (-) Steve Jobs Universal $111,380 +36% 421 $265   $16,915,508 34
- (-) Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials 20th Century Fox $97,831 +81% 441 $222   $79,988,611 55
- (-) Scout's Guide to the Zombie… Paramount Pictures $95,987 +7% 1,151 $83   $3,393,457 13
- (-) Spotlight Open Road $53,126 +59% 5 $10,625   $416,613 6
- (-) Minions Universal $47,780 +253% 227 $210   $335,315,360 125
- (-) Everest Universal $47,140 +31% 225 $210   $42,871,965 55
- (-) Brooklyn Fox Searchlight $33,735 +50% 5 $6,747   $323,197 8
- (-) Black Mass Warner Bros. $31,358 +65% 172 $182   $62,199,546 55
- (-) The Visit Universal $30,940 +36% 270 $115   $64,773,540 62
- (-) Jurassic World Universal $20,145 +93% 139 $145   $652,091,640 153
- (-) Rock the Kasbah Open Road $16,630 +7% 201 $83   $2,791,760 20
- (-) The Man in 3B Freestyle Releasing $12,791 +59% 36 $355   $137,125 6
- (-) He Named Me Malala Fox Searchlight $11,524 -64% 57 $202   $2,483,626 41
- (-) Freeheld Lionsgate $3,686 +2% 60 $61   $542,658 41
- (-) Big Stone Gap Picturehouse $3,618 -11% 34 $106   $908,006 34
- (-) Ladrones Lionsgate $3,228 +4% 39 $83   $3,040,664 34
- (-) The Transporter Refueled EuropaCorp $2,208 +27% 32 $69   $16,021,904 69
Our box office charts are compiled from data provided to us by distributors. To be included on our charts, please send reports to bodata@the-numbers.com.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 hours ago, langer said:

Saw this yesterday and was pleasantly surprised.  The general feedback I was getting suggested a subpar movie, but to me it was about as good as Casino Royale and barely below Skyfall. 

 

Daniel Craig's Bond is much more interesting than Brosnan. 

 

Agree. I saw it earlier today. I liked it.. I really don't get all the gloom and doom over it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 hour ago, RichWS said:

ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION TO THE CURRENT PRICE OF $8.34:

 

GoldenEye - $204.1 million

Tomorrow Never Dies - $227.7 million

The World Is Not Enough - $208.4 million

Die Another Day - $231.0 million

Casino Royale - $213.2 million

Quantum - $195.6 million

Skyfall - $318.9 million

 

Other than Skyfall, do you notice a pattern? There's always been a ceiling on these movies. Hell, Connery's biggest was Thunderball at $525.1 million. You Only Live Twice, the next film, made $299.4 million. Moore's biggest was Moonraker at $233.6 million. For Your Eyes Only, the next film, made $164.4 million. There are always specific reasons why certain Bond films hit bigger than others. As many others have pointed out, Skyfall simply had so many things in its favor that Spectre didn't. The 50th anniversary, Adele's song and important for a series that skews much older, genuinely great reviews and word-of-mouth. 

 

This series has always ebbed and flowed.

It is not the big drop from Skyfall that is surprising. It is the fact that it's going to have a sizable drop from all the other modern post 80's films too and go to such low attendance levels. Depending on legs, it could come as much as 5m short in admission from even QoS. The Thunderball to YOLT comparison isn't a good one because Thunderball was one of those 500+ mega blockbusters (adjusted). Of course there was nowhere to go but down. YOLT still was nearly as big of a hit as Skyfall, so it's not like attendance got low or anything. The best comparison is the Moonraker to FYEO one, however Moonraker wasn't nearly as big as Skyfall (and the general consensus on that film was always mixed unlike Skyfall), so even that drop wasn't as alarming.

Edited by MovieMan89
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

It is not the big drop from Skyfall that is surprising. It is the fact that it's going to have a sizable drop from all the other modern post 80's films too and go to such low attendance levels. Depending on legs, it could come as much as 5m short in admission from even QoS. The Thunderball to YOLT comparison isn't a good one because Thunderball was one of those 500+ mega blockbusters (adjusted). Of course there was nowhere to go but down. YOLT still was nearly as big of a hit as Skyfall, so it's not like attendance got low or anything. The best comparison is the Moonraker to FYEO one, however Moonraker wasn't nearly as big as Skyfall, so even that drop wasn't as alarming.

 

It'll end up right around $200M. Oh no, it'll end up around Quantum in terms of admission? What the hell happened?! "Alarming"? Again, the series EBBS AND FLOWS. Jesus Christ, I'm tired of all the hand-wringing. The big problem is too many folks thought Skyfall was the new normal. That film was an outlier. 

Edited by RichWS
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites





1 minute ago, RichWS said:

 

It'll end up right around $200M. Oh no, it'll end up around Quantum in terms of admission? What the hell happened?! "Alarming"? Again, the series EBBS AND FLOWS. Jesus Christ, I'm tired of all the hand-wringing. The big problem is too many folks thought Skyfall was the new normal. That film was an outlier. 

It is not hitting 200m. the 60% drop this weekend will show that. It's doing 175-180m, which is 160-170m of attendance when you take out IMAX. Yes, that's an alarming drop from the previous least attended modern Bond film. Again, especially since Skyfall was supposedly beloved, unlike the likes of a Moonraker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, MovieMan89 said:

It is not hitting 200m. the 60% drop this weekend will show that. It's doing 175-180m, which is 160-170m of attendance when you take out IMAX. Yes, that's an alarming drop from the previous least attended modern Bond film. Again, especially since Skyfall was supposedly beloved, unlike the likes of a Moonraker. 

 

Watch Bond 25 jump up, Bond 26 goes down. Alarming in what way? The series is now dying? The buzz and word-of-mouth wasn't nearly as good. What did you expect? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, RichWS said:

 

Watch Bond 25 jump up, Bond 26 goes down. Alarming in what way? The series is now dying? The buzz and word-of-mouth wasn't nearly as good. What did you expect? 

It's alarming because it means if the next one also doesn't deliver, we're looking at possible record lows for the franchise DOM. The next one can't drop from Spectre and pull anything half-ways respectable. Sure it could become just an OS series, but that would be kinda sad. Spectre puts a lot of pressure for them to deliver on the next film for Bond's domestic brand name. Though I do feel all they really have to do is re-cast Bond and pick a good choice and audiences will be interested again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Bond has been "dead" more times than almost any franchise. People said it after the Living Daylights, a View to Kill, and Die Another Day. But nope! Stilll chugging. It's a franchise that can get right back on the horse at any time with a little shakeup and a real good movie. All this doom and gloom that the franchise is "bottoming out" domestically is silly. Bond 25 can market itself around the 25th anniversary, cast a big name as the villain, hire a superstar to make a hit song again, cut some better trailers, and get better reviews and I guarantee it will be back over 200 million again. It's not alarming in the slightest. It's one movie that dropped. In 2012, people were saying that Bond was stronger than ever. It's really just somewhere in the middle- it's a strong franchise that does about 200 mill adjusted give or take the occasional outlier on either side. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

It's alarming because it means if the next one also doesn't deliver, we're looking at possible record lows for the franchise DOM. The next one can't drop from Spectre and pull anything half-ways respectable. Sure it could become just an OS series, but that would be kinda sad. Spectre puts a lot of pressure for them to deliver on the next film for Bond's domestic brand name. Though I do feel all they really have to do is re-cast Bond and pick a good choice and audiences will be interested again. 

 

All this one film after the biggest series hit in 30 years. Talk about an overreaction. We need a re-cast! Talk to me when we get to Licence to Kill-type numbers, okay? Bond has always been an big OS series. Considering how much the OS market has picked up this decade, why would it be sad that the OS market would take over? It certainly did for Skyfall.  

 

God, I wonder what people were saying over on BOM after Quantum. Pardon the pun, but the whole "sky is falling" mentality regarding this series is crazy to me. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites



9 minutes ago, RichWS said:

 

All this one film after the biggest series hit in 30 years. Talk about an overreaction. We need a re-cast! Talk to me when we get to Licence to Kill-type numbers, okay? Bond has always been an big OS series. Considering how much the OS market has picked up this decade, why would it be sad that the OS market would take over? It certainly did for Skyfall.  

 

God, I wonder what people were saying over on BOM after Quantum. Pardon the pun, but the whole "sky is falling" mentality regarding this series is crazy to me. 

We'll be near License to Kill numbers shortly if they play their cards for the next one the same way they did for this one. That's the point. People don't want to consider how this THREE DECADE low affects the franchise going forward. And that's perfectly fine I guess if they just want to stick all their eggs in the OS basket now and let Bond become Terminator. I for one though think it will be kind of sad if it loses its relevance DOM. 

 

As for Craig, he's old, tired, and downright entitled when it comes to the role at this point. He thinks he's the shit at this point, and as such doesn't think he even has to try anymore. And because he doesn't think he has to try, we get performances that, surprise surprise, have no effort behind them. He needs to go ASAP. A new Bond will always get people talking and re-new interest. Not only that, but because they  have to prove themselves more when they do a re-cast, that first film with a new Bond is usually the best of that actor's Bond filmography. It is definitely time. 

Edited by MovieMan89
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.