It | Sept. 8, 2017 | Warner Brothers | Andy Muschietti directing. Trailer on Page 12 NO SPOILER DISCUSSION. Certified Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes

[75Live]

7 hours ago, dashrendar44 said:

My only issue is that the repetitive aspect in presenting each kid (7 is a lot), their respective fear and ensuing encounters, feels like self-contained vignettes of heterogen nature pasted in between an Amblin's Coming-Of-Age comedy that have almost no bearing on the children's behaviour and following interactions until all of them have their scary trip (except for Beverley I guess since she's the only one that opens up to the boys and reaches out to certify she's not seeing imaginary things), so only then they might feel the need to share their mutual scary encounters with each other almost an hour in (Ritchie is the only one that get his personal encounter with Pennywise occuring in act 2 during the Neibolt haunted house trip after the projection scene sequence which was supposed to be the moment that ties all their personal fears into one). It's like one scene the kid gets almost killed by a psycho clown and the next that kid acts like nothing happened and resume their holidays instead of being in a state of shock and telling his friends about it.

 

Also the fact that they [REDACTED]

 

you may want to remove the redacted part from the post as they are technically book spoilers.  Not saying I disagree with the point of what you wrote in that section, just being careful since we were told to keep the movie and book separate  

[dashrendar44]

2 minutes ago, 75Live said:

 

you may want to remove the redacted part from the post as they are technically book spoilers.  Not saying I disagree with the point of what you wrote in that section, just being careful since we were told to keep the movie and book separate  

Done.

[75Live]

Just now, dashrendar44 said:

Done.

 

since I was given my first ever 24 hour thread ban yesterday, I was just looking out for you  

[That One Girl]

6 hours ago, Gumby said:

Did the kids drop as many F bombs in the book?

 

Yes.

[Valonqar]

Does anyone have any idea what age range Bat Girl is supposed to be? I know this is a bit OT but I'm hoping for Sophia Lillis. 

[somebody85]

On 9/20/2017 at 0:45 AM, Bishop54 said:

Pretty good copy of IT just showed up online.

Colors are garbage. Not like The Hitmans Bodyguard where an actual WEB release hit. The main scenes have been all over Youtube since the OW too.

[JB33]

For some reason the Pennywise scenes were even more intense when watching it for the 2nd time yesterday.

[DeeCee]

One of the final scenes in this is nearly one of the opening scenes in the TV mini series. 

[DeeCee]

It's interesting some scenes are almost shot for shot. 

[DeeCee]

William B. Davis. 

 

This isn't very scary so far. 

 

Sorry, Tim Curry. The movie Pennywise is definitely better. 

[DeeCee]

Rock fight. 

[dashrendar44]

We need Pennywise smileys.

 

 

[cheesypoofs]

On 9/20/2017 at 6:45 PM, Rman823 said:

I'm still pulling for Joseph Gordon Levitt. 

Me too. The boy who plays Stan looks just like a younger version of him

[Rman823]

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/it-movie-sequel-release-date-september-2019-1042845

[75Live]

I wasn't sure if any of the clips in this were spoilerish.  I don't think they are, but figured I'd test it in here first then maybe move it to the main movie thread.  But for those that like Batman and the psychology of him, as well as, IT.  I thought this was pretty well done  

 

 

[Rorschach]

6 hours ago, 75Live said:

I wasn't sure if any of the clips in this were spoilerish.  I don't think they are, but figured I'd test it in here first then maybe move it to the main movie thread.  But for those that like Batman and the psychology of him, as well as, IT.  I thought this was pretty well done  

 

 

That is easily one of the best fan-made trailers ever made. 

[JB33]

I'm up to "Derry: The Third Interlude" in the book (p. 665 or something).

 

Ya know, they could really do more IT movies, beyond Chapter Two, that tell the story of the various happenings before 1957-58 (1988 in the movie I believe) without it feeling like they're just milking it or forcing it. The material is there in the book.

 

I won't mention the events in case they count as book spoilers, but anyone who has read the book will know what I mean. The book is 1,152 pages and there is a ton of exposition there about the history of Derry.

 

What do you think @Stutterng baumer Denbrough and others?

[75Live]

17 hours ago, JB33 said:

I'm up to "Derry: The Third Interlude" in the book (p. 665 or something).

 

Ya know, they could really do more IT movies, beyond Chapter Two, that tell the story of the various happenings before 1957-58 (1988 in the movie I believe) without it feeling like they're just milking it or forcing it. The material is there in the book.

 

I won't mention the events in case they count as book spoilers, but anyone who has read the book will know what I mean. The book is 1,152 pages and there is a ton of exposition there about the history of Derry.

 

What do you think @Stutterng baumer Denbrough and others?

 

absolutely they could make basically an anthology with just using the different time periods on the film.  I would welcome it if they did it right.

[Elessar]

Just saw the movie. Really liked the kids. However, the scary bits fell a little flat. It felt like they ran out of ideas, with the most shocking moment being at the very beginning.

[chasmmi]

On 4/27/2016 at 9:05 AM, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:

I'd love to see it open to something like the Visit did, like 25 million or something.  

 

IS always fun seeing posts like this after the fact