Passengers | Chris Pratt, Jennifer Lawrence | Dec 21, 2016 | Trailer pg 70

[Arlborn]

Reshoots?! It's doomed.

 

 

Spoiler

 

[Black Hawk]

[The Futurist]

What did they do to the Queen s face, sorry I don't get it.

[trifle]

27 minutes ago, Black Hawk said:

 

9 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

What did they do to the Queen s face, sorry I don't get it.

 

LOL!

 

I was about to say 'what is that stuff on her face?'

 

But I'm just glad to see it even if their camera is having problems.

[marveldcfox]

They made her cheeks thinner and gave her a tanned look.

[MCKillswitch123]

They're still pushing this to Christmas? Then they BETTER have a fucking trailer ready for Magnificent Seven. Otherwise, I don't have a clue of what they're doing w/this.

[Krissykins]

Poster is appalling.

 

Looks like they just took a GQ cover and a Vogue cover and shoved the title in between.

[baumer]

I have faith that this is coming out at Christmas. Reshoots as we all know don't really mean much in terms of getting it delayed.  I know this is just one small example but when Pretty in Pink was close to getting released and it went to a test audience they hated the ending where Molly Ringwald ended up with Jon Cryer.

 

John Hughes then called back Andrew McCarthy to film the scene at the end where McCarthy and Molly Ringwald get together after the prom. Andrew McCarthy I already shaved his head and lost about 10 pounds for another role he was already filming.

 

Still came out on time and the end scene still worked very well. I have total confidence that these reshoots are just to touch things up.

[Krissykins]

Reshoots mean nothing.

 

But the IMDB trolls love them.

[Klingo]

Just now, trifle said:

 

 

LOL!

 

I was about to say 'what is that stuff on her face?'

 

But I'm just glad to see it even if their camera is having problems.

There are lights and stuff from the reflection.  Can see them continue on from the edge of the poster and onto the poster frame.  But there is lot of Photoshop on it as well.  Even on Chris Pratt.

[JennaJ]

That's a different shot of JLaw then the one in EW. Pratt's is the same.

 

I liked her previous one better.

[4815162342]

Poster's pretty dumb.

[JennaJ]

I liked the first one from Cinema Con best (except for the terribly long tagline that appeared in some versions).

 

 

 

[Ethan Hunt]

Super lame poster

Edited September 3, 2016 by Ethan Hunt

[antovolk]

HD courtesy of yours truly - almost too simple

[efialtes76]

That poster is so BAD!

Edited September 3, 2016 by efialtes76

[A District 3 Engineer]

4 hours ago, Klingo said:

There are lights and stuff from the reflection.  Can see them continue on from the edge of the poster and onto the poster frame.  But there is lot of Photoshop on it as well.  Even on Chris Pratt.

 

There's a lot of Photoshop on that one too.(you can see it on Jennifer's nose and lips) 

 

Edited September 3, 2016 by A District 3 Engineer

[Hatebox]

If you scroll up and down the page those faces become funnier and funnier.

[Klingo]

Just now, A District 3 Engineer said:

There's a lot of Photoshop on that one too.(you can see it on Jennifer's nose and lips) 

 

Practically almost look like someone else instead of JLaw.

[Klingo]

Somebody point out that the symbols on the poster mean something if nobody notice yet.  Thought you guys might like to play a little game finding out what it means.

Edited September 3, 2016 by Klingo