Spider-Man: Into The Spider-verse | 12.14.2018 | Sony | Phil Lord and Chris Miller

[eddyxx]

Surpringly looks good but I don't like the animation of his face.

[RobinHood26]

-

Edited August 8, 2020 by RobinHood26

[angeldelmito]

1 hour ago, Spidey Freak said:

 

Gonna drop a (for now) big ass spoiler so click with care

 

  Hide contents

Only the Peter Parker in Miles's universe may be dead. That other, adult Spider-Man we see Miles talking to at the end is probably a Peter Parker from another universe who has come to tell Miles about the different Spider-People from the Spider-Verse.

 

uhm

 

 

 

[angeldelmito]

2 hours ago, Noctis said:

Who is she? Her gifs make me laugh so much lol

ha name is gretchen and shez from a brazilian tv show 

 

[Noctis]

6 minutes ago, angeldelmito said:

ha name is gretchen and shez from a brazilian tv show 

 

Speak properly.

[75Live]

looks like the animation for the california raisins when he doesn't have the mask on

 

plus it the movements in some scenes even with the outfit on are really choppy.  

 

Sad because the early parts and look of the trailer was good until some of that started to happen

 

so overall kind of an average trailer

[Barnack]

Really love what they seem to be going for there and tend to give Lord&Miller full benefit of the doubt to anything they touch.

[Fancyarcher]

Looks good. I actually really like the animation too. A nice mix of photo-realism with cel-shading. Rare that we see in an animated film.

[MovieMan89]

Woah, was NOT expecting those amazing visuals. My interest for this just went up like 500%. 

[angeldelmito]

1 hour ago, Noctis said:

Speak properly.

no thanks! 

 

[cookie]

4 hours ago, CJohn said:

Holy shit first movie ever to get a wide release and make literally zero money.

 

0/0 is my prediction.

 

Maybe it gets 1M OS.

Crack is whack.

[grey ghost]

Something's wrong with Miles face?

 

Am I missing something? 

[DMan7]

1B WW for this.

[Jonwo]

Visually it look great, looks like Sony aren't being cheap like they have been on their last few films. 

 

 

[Barnack]

2 minutes ago, Jonwo said:

Visually it look great, looks like Sony aren't being cheap like they have been on their last few films. 

Sony are not cheap with Lord&Miller they got 84.5m for 22 Jump Street, 116.84m net on Cloudy, a Spider Man Lord/Miller/Feige/Pascal projects... even Rothman will spend on that.

[Poseidon]

While it certainly looks good, I don't understand, why they take that gamble again. They once destroyed the franchise by rebooting it too soon, then Disney came by and brought Spidey back and then...well, there's the next one only 1 1/2 years later.

 

I think this might confuse GA.

 

Comic Fans might somehow get it, but how do you explain 2 different Spideys on the screen to everybody else? 

Edited December 10, 2017 by Poseidon

[YM!]

32 minutes ago, Jonwo said:

Visually it look great, looks like Sony aren't being cheap like they have been on their last few films. 

 

 

Any predictions?

[Jonwo]

Just now, YourMother the Edgelord said:

Any predictions?

Not at the moment.

[Barnack]

6 minutes ago, Poseidon said:

While it certainly looks good, I don't understand, why they take that gamble again. They once destroyed the franchise by rebooting it to fast, then Disney came by and brought Spidey back and then...well, there's the next one only 1 1/2 years later.

 

I do not know how exactly the deal was when they started Amazing Spider Man but they had a close saying that they must release a Spider Man movie within 5 year's.

 

And they had 3 year's after the release of Spider Man 3 to start making the next one (if they didn't bought an extension), so I imagine pre-produciton of Amazing spider man must have started by summer 2010 at the latest.

 

They didn't really had a choice to reboot it slower.

 

 

 

[Poseidon]

1 minute ago, Barnack said:

 

 

They didn't really had a choice to reboot it slower.

 

 

 

They could have continued. Or been innovative by doing an animated SM back then...