Ralph Breaks the Internet | Rich Moore / Phil Johnston | 21st November, 2018

[Jason]

55 minutes ago, Mojoguy said:

I'm kind of surprised WIR is getting a movie sequel and not Tangled, which made more money and I assume sold more merchandise.

 

It was discussed, but the directors (Howard and Greno) weren't interested: http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/tangled/33887/exclusive-why-disney-never-made-tangled-2.

Edited July 1, 2016 by Jason

[The Panda]

46 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

It was discussed, but the directors (Howard and Greno) weren't interested: http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/tangled/33887/exclusive-why-disney-never-made-tangled-2.

 

Thats good.  Tangled didn't have much room for an actually good sequel (same with Frozen).

[MrPink]

@4815162342

 

Let's get Geralt of Rivia in this one.

[MovieMan89]

2 hours ago, Mojoguy said:

I'm kind of surprised WIR is getting a movie sequel and not Tangled, which made more money and I assume sold more merchandise.

I'm sure Tangled is more profitable with merchandise added in, but in terms of box office WiR was actually the bigger success. Remember Tangled had a gargantuan $260m budget, thanks to its tumultuous production, and didn't quite hit 600m WW. WiR on the other hand did close to 500 on a 165m budget. The profit from box office for WiR was probably twice as much or more than Tangled's. 

Edited July 1, 2016 by MovieMan89

[AniNate]

No Rihanna montage this time, please 

[MovieMan89]

1 minute ago, tribefan695 said:

No Rihanna montage this time, please 

Clearly there will be a montage set to Lana Del Rey's Video Games. 

[AniNate]

Just now, MovieMan89 said:

Clearly there will be a montage set to Lana Del Rey's Video Games. 

 

That might be interesting, depending on the context 

 

I'd have rather they used that Owl City song in the spot, tbh

[BourneFan #1]

I will pay for the entire budget if that means any sort of Uncharted reference in the film.

[4815162342]

1 hour ago, MrPink said:

@4815162342

 

Let's get Geralt of Rivia in this one.

 

Disney.

 

Star Wars.

 

Kyle Katarn.

[kowhite]

Nintendo, play ball.  Say yes.  Do it.

[cannastop]

45 minutes ago, kowhite said:

Nintendo, play ball.  Say yes.  Do it.

I don't think there's any question that they wouldn't play ball.

[AniNate]

I doubt they'll be any bigger a presence here if the plot's more about the internet. 

 

I'd rather they focus on making Ralph and Vanellope more interesting characters

[Fullbuster]

27 minutes ago, tribefan695 said:

I doubt they'll be any bigger a presence here if the plot's more about the internet. 

 

I'd rather they focus on making Ralph and Vanellope more interesting characters

 

Well, Mario Kart and Smash Bros are played online so why not.

 

However with a focus on the Internet it's likely to bring Warcraft references. Or Call of Duty.

[goldenstate5]

4 hours ago, tribefan695 said:

I doubt they'll be any bigger a presence here if the plot's more about the internet. 

 

I'd rather they focus on making Ralph and Vanellope more interesting characters

 

I think they're already interesting. 

 

Re: Zootopia 2. I think a TV series is a better use of the IP, but I wouldn't be adverse to a sequel. However I take issue with those wanting a sequel to be about Nick/Judy becoming a "couple" just like I have issue with the Give Elsa A GF movement. I don't think the sequels have to be about romance, and it's nice to have characters or friends who DON'T develop feelings for another. If they do it, I'm fine with it but I don't think anybody is entitled to have that come into being. It's a creative work, not a political statement.

 

Also Nick and Judy hooking up is weird. Sorry. It is.

[Fullbuster]

19 minutes ago, goldenstate5 said:

 

I think they're already interesting. 

 

Re: Zootopia 2. I think a TV series is a better use of the IP, but I wouldn't be adverse to a sequel. However I take issue with those wanting a sequel to be about Nick/Judy becoming a "couple" just like I have issue with the Give Elsa A GF movement. I don't think the sequels have to be about romance, and it's nice to have characters or friends who DON'T develop feelings for another. If they do it, I'm fine with it but I don't think anybody is entitled to have that come into being. It's a creative work, not a political statement.

 

Also Nick and Judy hooking up is weird. Sorry. It is.

 

Totally agree, Judy and Nick being a couple would be too weird, they're not from the same species, it's like expecting Elsa and Olaf to be a couple, or Hiro to have a mechanic BF/GF.

No, please no, why do you want to waste a great friendship with weird romance?

 

As for Elsa finding love why not, she can think about that now.

[Fullbuster]

About the Tangled sequel that will be a TV show, it is expected in 2017 and will look like this :

 

 

Yes, in 2D, and she'll be back with her blond hair and the story will take place right after the movie.

 

People wanting a return to Disney movies in 2D could be interested.

[goldenstate5]

44 minutes ago, Fullbuster said:

 

Totally agree, Judy and Nick being a couple would be too weird, they're not from the same species, it's like expecting Elsa and Olaf to be a couple, or Hiro to have a mechanic BF/GF.

No, please no, why do you want to waste a great friendship with weird romance?

 

As for Elsa finding love why not, she can think about that now.

 

Yeah, she can. It can even be a woman. But it doesn't have to be because some fans feel entitled to that. It's whatever the creative powers that be wish IMO.

[Ezen Baklattan]

1 hour ago, Fullbuster said:

About the Tangled sequel that will be a TV show, it is expected in 2017 and will look like this :

 

 

Yes, in 2D, and she'll be back with her blond hair and the story will take place right after the movie.

 

People wanting a return to Disney movies in 2D could be interested.

 

[goldenstate5]

I'm sure they'll make up some bullshit even if it renders the entire film's climax useless from a thematic perspective.

[cannastop]

4 hours ago, goldenstate5 said:

 

I think they're already interesting. 

 

Re: Zootopia 2. I think a TV series is a better use of the IP, but I wouldn't be adverse to a sequel. However I take issue with those wanting a sequel to be about Nick/Judy becoming a "couple" just like I have issue with the Give Elsa A GF movement. I don't think the sequels have to be about romance, and it's nice to have characters or friends who DON'T develop feelings for another. If they do it, I'm fine with it but I don't think anybody is entitled to have that come into being. It's a creative work, not a political statement.

 

Also Nick and Judy hooking up is weird. Sorry. It is.

I don't want a tv show mainly because they probably couldn't get Jason Bateman to be part of it.

 

And Zootopia 2 doesn't have to have Nick and Judy hook up, even if I think that would be cool.