Jump to content

Alli

Weekend Thread: Weekend estimates pg 38...BP 41.14....WIT 33.31

Recommended Posts



1 hour ago, baumer said:

 

Nothing is perfect.  There's no way to figure anything out down to the last ticket.  It's just an approximation.

The Swedish film institute has numbers down to the last ticket up through 2016 for Swedish cinemas (from then on the cinema owners association decided to not give them access to the stats any longer, which is crap for me). So it can be done, but if the records don't exist, or are too decentralized, it won't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites







Most have come in. Waiting for Rabbit and Jumanji.

    Movie Distributor Gross Change Thtrs. Per Thtr. Total Gross Week
1 (1) Black Panther Walt Disney $40,817,579 -38% 3,942 $10,355   $561,697,180 4
2 new A Wrinkle in Time Walt Disney $33,123,609   3,980 $8,323   $33,123,609 1
3 new The Strangers: Prey at Night Aviron Pictures $10,402,271   2,464 $4,222   $10,402,271 1
4 (2) Red Sparrow 20th Century Fox $8,502,263 -50% 3,064 $2,775   $31,471,006 2
5 (4) Game Night Warner Bros. $7,863,391 -24% 3,061 $2,569   $45,004,023 3
6 (5) Peter Rabbit Sony Pictures $6,800,000 -32% 3,112 $2,185   $93,457,806 5
7 (3) Death Wish MGM $6,581,130 -49% 2,882 $2,284   $23,856,431 2
8 (6) Annihilation Paramount Pictures $3,302,319 -41% 1,709 $1,932   $26,246,833 3
9 new The Hurricane Heist Entertainment Studi… $3,024,399   2,402 $1,259   $3,024,399 1
10 (7) Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle Sony Pictures $2,750,000 -38% 2,157 $1,275   $397,258,021 12
11 new Gringo STX Entertainment $2,722,420   2,404 $1,132   $2,722,420 1
12 (11) The Shape of Water Fox Searchlight $2,347,664 +59% 1,552 $1,513   $60,940,802 15
13 (9) The Greatest Showman 20th Century Fox $1,914,157 -29% 952 $2,011   $167,614,558 12
14 (8) Fifty Shades Freed Universal $1,368,020 -60% 1,357 $1,008   $98,382,615 5
15 new Thoroughbreds Focus Features $1,224,430   549 $2,230   $1,224,430 1
16 (13) Three Billboards Outside Eb… Fox Searchlight $694,643 -46% 552 $1,258   $53,339,205 18
17 (14) The Post 20th Century Fox $328,610 -69% 278 $1,182   $81,159,866 12
18 (16) Darkest Hour Focus Features $265,545 -62% 245 $1,084   $56,088,295 16
19 (26) Star Wars Ep. VIII: The Las… Walt Disney $265,513 +5% 246 $1,079   $619,483,244 13
20 (12) The 15:17 to Paris Warner Bros. $264,490 -81% 420 $630   $35,772,875 5
21 (18) I, Tonya Neon $263,031 -52% 243 $1,082   $29,509,368 14
22 (24) Coco Walt Disney $258,951 -19% 194 $1,335   $208,845,284 16
23 (15) Phantom Thread Focus Features $235,490 -69% 184 $1,280   $20,713,025 11
24 (29) Ferdinand 20th Century Fox $192,103 -9% 201 $956   $83,362,967 13
25 new The Death of Stalin IFC Films $184,805   4 $46,201   $184,805 1
26 (21) Maze Runner: The Death Cure 20th Century Fox $181,633 -61% 214 $849   $57,448,833 7
27 (17) Lady Bird A24 $173,634 -69% 156 $1,113   $48,701,472 19
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





1 hour ago, Thomas Beck said:

What's the draw for A2 now that 3D has become common and mundane?

 

Does Cameron have some new breakthrough/gimmick lined up?

Hey Tommy, welcome! Just as sound and colour were are gimmicks, neither is 3D. When Hollywood uses 6 week post processed 3D for the sole purpose of grabbing, maybe then you could call it gimmick. Avatar though, that's a different story as it was filmed in native 3D for the purpose of delivering something truly beautiful and 2.78 billion dollars says it succeeded in doing so.Avatar had many more draws than 3D, it has a compelling love story and is character driven, the beautiful Pandora that took so many people's breath away (in 2D aswell!), action and science fiction.


Cameron doesn't do gimmicks, he's an artisan who works to improve the craft, however if I were to name the new breakthroughs for Avatar 2 this will be my predictions. Dynamic frame rate, Jim (James Cameron) calls frame rate a tool rather than a format, he will play action scenes in higher fps. Underwater motion capture, this has never been done before and in Cameron fashion he has created a new technology to bring his vision to life, except the best underwater visuals of all time (step aside Blue Planet 2 (they used Jim's cameras anyway)).

Edited by IronJimbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, straggler said:

So Red Sparrow came in 450K above estimates and had a sub-50 percent drop. Imagine what could have been if the critics would let Jlaw's films breathe. 

 

JLaw the new Adam Sandler.  It's obvious the critics have it in for her.

 

 :bash:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



8 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

 

JLaw the new Adam Sandler.  It's obvious the critics have it in for her.

 

 :bash:

 

 

To be honest, I think the critics are having issues with her stardom.They act like they own her and own her creative choices, and they bash every film she does lately for some offense or another. Even Sasha Stone, no Jlaw fan, noted this. They bashed Joy because she worked with a director three times (apparently there is a little known codicil in the Hollywood rule book and Dicaprio and Deniro are exempt), called Passengers a pro-rape film, and smeared RS as exploitative. It has been extra, and her stardom/status is the heart of it.  

Edited by straggler
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, straggler said:

To be honest, I think the critics are having issues with her stardom.They act like they own her and own her creative choices, and they bash every film she does lately for some offense or another. Even Sasha Stone, no Jlaw fan, noted this. They bashed Joy because she worked with a director three times (apparently there is a little known codicil in the Hollywood rule book and Dicaprio and Deniro are exempt), called Passengers a pro-rape film, and smeared RS as exploitative. It has been extra, and her stardom/status is the heart of it.  

 

I don't really buy any of this.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, HerediTele said:

 

I don't really buy any of this.

You don't have to. The truth is out there. Hollywood is a neurotic place. What happened to Passengers was a hit job. And RS is not a 48 RT score film, whether it is masterpiece or not. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, straggler said:

You don't have to. The truth is out there. Hollywood is a neurotic place. What happened to Passengers was a hit job. And RS is not a 48 RT score film, whether it is masterpiece or not. 

 

You're pitching your opinion (which is highly subjective, as is all of ours) as fact. PASSENGERS was god-awful. Not JLaw's fault, but it's a lousy movie in almost every regard. 48% RT just means half the critics liked it and half didn't.

 

No one went after JL for doing multiple movies with DOR -- some just pointed out that she was usually miscast in significantly older roles. Again, that's not her fault, that's DOR's. She did a fine job in those movies.

 

There's no witch-hunt here. No one is out to get her.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites









  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.