Black Panther: Wakanda Forever | Nov 11 2022 | Starring 2023 Best Supporting Actress Oscar Nominee Angela Bassett. She did not do the thing!

[ChipDerby]

Went through a lot of pages for this

 

 

[ChipDerby]

tl;dr is it was in the high 80s after the very initial 90%+ reviews

[Verrows]

8 minutes ago, Hatebox said:

I know it’s pissing in the wind to point it out after this many years but it is genuinely demented how much this forum cares about incremental RT percentiles.

I could be wrong but aren't most people here interested because it correlates strongly to box office?

[wildphantom]

8 minutes ago, Hatebox said:

I know it’s pissing in the wind to point it out after this many years but it is genuinely demented how much this forum cares about incremental RT percentiles.

[Liiviig 1998]

89% with 112 reviews

7.9/10 avg.

7.5/10 top critics average.

 

[eddyxx]

1 minute ago, ChipDerby said:

tl;dr is it was in the high 80s after the very initial 90%+ reviews

Yeah I just checked the thread in the archive and the highest it got was 90% before falling to 86 once it hit the 100s

[Porthos]

@jedijake As a person who once had a bit too unhealthy relationship with Caring About Rotten Tomatoes, I can confirm that the date of reviews listed weeks/months/years after the fact isn't always the same as reviews as they roll in on RT Watch Day.  Especially for films with hundreds of reviews.

 

Could be some internal chronometer they have, could be they're basing it on publication of review and not when they get it (thus they backdate some reviews).  Or it could even be semi-random based on date of publication/unknowable black box algorithm games at play.

 

Either way, unfortunately, going back and sorting by date over at RT isn't always gonna be the same as RT Scores as They Roll In on Day 1.

[jedijake]

1 minute ago, Porthos said:

@jedijake As a person who once had a bit too unhealthy relationship with Caring About Rotten Tomatoes, I can confirm that the date of reviews listed weeks/months/years after the fact isn't always the same as reviews as they roll in on RT Watch Day.  Especially for films with hundreds of reviews.

 

Could be some internal chronometer they have, could be they're basing it on publication of review and not when they get it (thus they backdate some reviews).  Or it could even be semi-random based on date of publication/unknowable black box algorithm games at play.

 

Either way, unfortunately, going back and sorting by date over at RT isn't always gonna be the same as RT Scores as They Roll In on Day 1.

Okay, then I stand corrected.

 

And as such, I don't know if there's parallel data for Shang Chi and No Way Home either. But I don't think that either ever dropped into the 80's.

[adaros]

8 minutes ago, Verrows said:

I could be wrong but aren't most people here interested because it correlates strongly to box office?

RT means nothing to me I just want to see big BO numbers.

[eddyxx]

Just now, Porthos said:

@jedijake As a person who once had a bit too unhealthy relationship with Caring About Rotten Tomatoes, I can confirm that the date of reviews listed weeks/months/years after the fact isn't always the same as reviews as they roll in on RT Watch Day.  Especially for films with hundreds of reviews.

 

Could be some internal chronometer they have, could be they're basing it on publication of review and not when they get it (thus they backdate some reviews).  Or it could even be semi-random based on date of publication/unknowable black box algorithm games at play.

 

Either way, unfortunately, going back and sorting by date over at RT isn't always gonna be the same as RT Scores as They Roll In on Day 1.

I saw a great post from you in the infinity war thread. You were right about 1billion domestic and the 300m ow being dead though.

 

 

[thajdikt]

Reviews are one thing, which seem to be good. Maybe it will land around IW %. But i´m very interested in how the audience reacts to it. 

[Grebacio]

 

25 minutes ago, Nikostar said:

Where was Eternals, Shang Chi, No Way home, MOM and LAnd T after 100 reviews? 

Shang Chi

 

On 8/29/2021 at 12:06 PM, Krissykins said:

Still only 120 reviews, when will the rest be added? Currently at 91%. 

 

Eternals

 

On 10/29/2021 at 12:57 AM, Ryan Reynolds said:

61% on RT after 105 reviews

 

 

No way home

Multiverse of Madness

On 5/3/2022 at 6:08 PM, ThomasNicole said:

79% with 113 reviews (average up to 6.7 tho) 

 

I don't see much reason for it to drop (or increase) much more from here. Likely finishing with 75-77%, could've been worse. 

 

Not that i care that much, my favorite MCU movie since EG was Eternals.

Thor Love and Thunder
 

On 7/5/2022 at 3:55 PM, ThomasNicole said:

71% with 113 reviews (6.7 average) 

 

Yeah should finish with 66-70%, let's hope we don't get another B cinemascore here. 

 

Sounds like a fun time so maybe finally audiences won't be turned down by reviews and overall feeling on social media.

[jedijake]

38 minutes ago, adaros said:

RT means nothing to me I just want to see big BO numbers.

Well me too, so i am curious about the connection between the two. I don't care about the RT score past OW. I just want it to do better than certain other movies (DSMoM, TROS, TLK'19, TDKR, AOU) in its OW and domestic BO.

Edited November 8, 2022 by jedijake

[eddyxx]

If it doesn’t do better than a divisive Dr. Strange sequel then that’s gonna be a bad look. 

[Verrows]

1 hour ago, adaros said:

RT means nothing to me I just want to see big BO numbers.

Me too. I just mean that people here are interested in reviews because it gives us our next hint as to box office projections.

 

Now, in terms of impact on my personal opinion on a movie itself, I couldn't care less. I'll go to see.movies I want to see and I won't see movies I'm not interested in seeing. I don't have a single actual use for film critics.

Edited November 8, 2022 by Verrows

[Verrows]

35 minutes ago, eddyxx said:

If it doesn’t do better than a divisive Dr. Strange sequel then that’s gonna be a bad look. 

[Verrows]

37 minutes ago, eddyxx said:

If it doesn’t do better than a divisive Dr. Strange sequel then that’s gonna be a bad look. 

Agreed. That's been my thought regarding previews tracking below MoM. It's quite surprising. However it looks like this one will be more backloaded, which is a look I actually prefer. Like back when MCU movie multis we're greater than 6.

[cmbbox2390]

🍅 CRITICS CONSENSUS

A poignant tribute that satisfyingly moves the franchise forward, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever marks an ambitious and emotionally rewarding triumph for the MCU.Read critic reviews

[jedijake]

I've felt invested in this movie, for whatever reason, more than any since TFA. TFA exceeded my expectations in every facet. So I probably show a bit TOO much passion, or even anxiety, over this one.

[Gavin Feng]

Even many 4/5 reviews say the pace is not good. Not a good sign for general audience's reactions.