FilmBuff Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Texas tech sucks!! That'll rile her up more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 8 minutes ago, Daxtreme said: @Rey is back baby, let the gifs flow. So, why aren't you giving me enough likes? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Binoche Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 So Passengers will finish the holidays with around $60M and then earn another $30M or so to finish its domestic run short of $100M. Only the biggest movie stars of our time. Tom Cruise who? Julia Roberts who? Sandra Bullock who? Tom Hanks who? EVERYONE pouring into the theaters to watch the "sexy" JLaw and CPratt, aka the biggest movie stars of our time. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrestrial Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Quote La La Land Lionsgate $2,489,877 n/c 734 $3,392 $24,715,199 Hacksaw Ridge Lionsgate $114,235 5% 428 $267 $64,208,845 Patriots Day Lionsgate $47,558 -7% 7 $6,794 $480,969 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daxtreme Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 1 minute ago, Rey said: So, why aren't you giving me enough likes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elcaballero Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 (edited) I want 10... more movies with Donnie Yen in them! Edited December 30, 2016 by elcaballero 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 3 minutes ago, La Binoche said: So Passengers will finish the holidays with around $60M and then earn another $30M or so to finish its domestic run short of $100M. Only the biggest movie stars of our time. Tom Cruise who? Julia Roberts who? Sandra Bullock who? Tom Hanks who? EVERYONE pouring into the theaters to watch the "sexy" JLaw and CPratt, aka the biggest movie stars of our time. Considering the movie got piss poor reviews and had shitty marketing, the fact that their movie sold solely on them might make 90M-120M (depending on legs) is fantastic. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 6 minutes ago, Rey said: So, why aren't you giving me enough likes? Like for like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Just now, FilmBuff said: Texas Tech sucks!! That'll rile her up more. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 1 minute ago, WrathOfHan said: Like for like? Especially for someone being extra about not liking Rogue One: A Star Wars Snatch. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrestrial Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Quote Manchester-by-the Sea Roadside Attractions $1,029,716 -4% 1,213 $849 $24,224,651 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Just now, Rey said: Especially for someone being extra about not liking Rogue One: A Star Wars Snatch. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celedhring Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 5 minutes ago, That One Guy said: Considering the movie got piss poor reviews and had shitty marketing, the fact that their movie sold solely on them might make 90M-120M (depending on legs) is fantastic. Indeed. If I'm not mistaken, Passengers will easily become the highest grossing romance film of the year. And a sci-fi romance at that. Given the poor reviews and the state of the genre, I don't think the performance is that bad. In fact I believe the leads carried this quite far all things considered. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPink Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 @Sam I see you, I never heard your R1 thoughts 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claire of Themyscira Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Just now, WrathOfHan said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POTUS 2020 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 36 minutes ago, PPZVGOS said: It has still managed to grow a tiny bit this year, but nothing like the previous 5. It will take significantly longer for the Chinese BO to overtake the North American one, but it will happen within the next few years, it's inevitable, their market is far from being saturated. The government has stopped subsidizing ticket sales and also prohibited distributors from buying their own tickets in order to make every movie appear as a major hit, hence why the growth rate stalled in 2016. Growth will definitely resume in the coming years. Growth was up 4% in local currency, down 1.5% in dollars. they hit their saturation point. BO is limited by GDP as shown below. SK is on top as it has a much higher GDP/ppp than its GDP/nom and has a high urban population. The lower the urban rate the smaller the BO/GDP ratio. China is at the upper end of established markets with high urbanization. So its likely to drop as reflected in the March to date loss of 10% YoY now that the novelty is wearing off(moviegoing new to many people in the last 5 years, same happened in US after 1930s). Passing domestic will be no sooner than 2030 IMO. I made this call 18 months ago while the BO was up 50% YoY in June 2015 and everyone was saying it would pass domestic by 2017-18. 2017 will drop to 6.5b. Its acting very much like a stock market or real estate bubble. Same curve. GDP (000) GDP Growth BO (000) BO Growth BO/GDP Urban % South Korea 1,400,000 1,600 0.114% 82 Australia 1,450,000 1,000 0.069% 89 Mexico 1,280,000 870 0.068% 79 China 2016 10,700,000 +4.5% 6,700 -+1% 0.063% 57 France 2,850,000 1,800 0.063% 79 China 2015 10,800,000 +5.0% 6,800 +42% 0.063% 56 Russia 1,326,000 796 0.060% 74 UK 3,050,000 1,700 0.056% 82 Dom 2016 20,000,000 11,000 0.055% 81 Spain 1,400,000 700 0.050% 77 China 2014 10,400,000 +5.8% 4,800 +41% 0.046% 55 Japan 4,600,000 2,000 0.043% 92 Italy 2,150,000 800 0.037% 67 China 2013 9,500,000 +12.0% 3,400 +32% 0.036% 54 Brazil 2,350,000 800 0.034% 80 Germany 3,850,000 1,300 0.034% 69 China 2012 8,500,000 +12.0% 2,600 +34% 0.031% 53 China 2011 7,500,000 +15.0% 1,900 +33% 0.025% 52 Average 5,728,111 2,809 0.053% 71 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 7 minutes ago, That One Guy said: Considering the movie got piss poor reviews and had shitty marketing, the fact that their movie sold solely on them might make 90M-120M (depending on legs) is fantastic. Tom Cruise and Tom Hanks had flops in October lmao, but that doesn't count I guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalismanRing Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 1 minute ago, That One Guy said: Considering the movie got piss poor reviews and had shitty marketing, the fact that their movie sold solely on them might make 90M-120M (depending on legs) is fantastic. Shitty marketing or not there was a lot of it and it was expensive in addition to the $110m+ budget. This wasn't some under the radar under promoted indie just getting along on star power. The movie would probably have made been more successful for the studio being a $35-40m vehicle for Keanu Reeves & Rachel McAdams/Emily Blunt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
narniadis Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 I so love Rey - it's like christmas when I see that she had the last post - opening the thread to see what glorious thing has been given to us mere mortals.... (blatant trolling for likes lol!) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 2 minutes ago, TalismanRing said: Shitty marketing or not there was a lot of it and it was expensive in addition to the $110m+ budget. This wasn't some under the radar under promoted indie just getting along on star power. The movie would probably have made been more successful for the studio being a $35-40m vehicle for Keanu Reeves & Rachel McAdams/Emily Blunt I'm not saying the movie was a financial success, but all things considered, it did wonders just off of its two leads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
