Jump to content

Grebacio

Weekend Thread (9/22-24) | Weekend Estimates - DWD 19.35, Woman King 11, Avatar 10.5, Barbarian 4.8, See How They Run & Pearl 1.9

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, grim22 said:

Good point about Avatar popularity. It's broadly popular as a spectacle but not as a discussion piece. It's something people will show up for to experience it but they aren't going to start developing theories on how unobtainium works exactly

 

 

 

 

 

 

That's my theory as well. 

 

It's not just that unlike all the franchises people compares with Avatar, it have only 1 movie and that's all for 13 years, but also that it's not the type of movie designed to being discussed. 

 

Not only MCU but most of franchises these days are made around easter eggs and theories so the fans can engage with them while waiting for the other entries every year and the brand is always trending.

 

Avatar was another type of blockbuster, made in another time. What's there to discuss? I'm a big fan of the movie and i don't talk about it. It doesn't help that the people online that loves Avatar doesn't really enter on stanwars, they're very peaceful. The fans on reddit are super sweet, they just watch the movie constantly and live their lives.

 

The problem is that these days people measure success and staying power with memes, quotes and engagement on social media, and pretty much all standalone movies doesn't have all that, but since Avatar is the rare case that is up there with all the franchises, people keeps questioning it. 

 

People maybe don't remember now, but not long ago similar questions are made about Titanic, another movie that don't fit the franchise logic. A lot of people online spend years convincing themselves that nobody likes Titanic and it made 2B just because young girls liked Leo.

 

We all know Avatar WOM was insane and appealed to pretty much every demographic possible, people remember having a great experience and it doesn't matter if they don't scream about it online, once the sequel is available people will quietly go to theaters. We're already seeing this with just a re-release. 

 

And Top Gun is a brilliant comparisson because we all saw people saying for 2 years here that it won't do big because it's fans are just old people and most of the audience don't care or don't remember about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



9 minutes ago, grey ghost said:

 

Pretty sure 6x legs for a sequel to a blockbuster is an anomoly.

 

December release or not.

Avatar had the biggest OW ever for December in 2009 and still have 10x multiplier, we can call that an anomaly as well. 

 

Of course the sequel will me more frontloaded, but there's nothing absurd in thinking it will double the first one OW and have half the legs to a similar total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 hours ago, Eric from Progressive said:

The whole structure of the movie didn’t do anything for me. Has the issue anthology films usually have where some stories are dull and go on too long, or are engaging but don’t go on long enough. Then the final third goes into a random story detour and it’s like…why did I watch this? Oh well.

The 3rd act felt off to me. I just didn't get the point. I feel like Miller wanted to talk about the power of love but the landing failed to deliver. I really liked the stories of the genie tho.

2 hours ago, CoolioD1 said:

the last 20 minutes of 3k years of longing had more fade to blacks than return of the king. can't tell you how many times i was halfway out my seat.

This happened to me once lmao. I actually thought the movie had finished only for it to return one final time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ThomasNicole said:

Avatar had the biggest OW ever for December in 2009 and still have 10x multiplier, we can call that an anomaly as well. 

 

Of course the sequel will me more frontloaded, but there's nothing absurd in thinking it will double the first one OW and have half the legs to a similar total.

 

 

That would require a lightning in a bottle reception for two consecutive movies which would be yet another anomoly.

 

We shall see.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, grey ghost said:

 

 

That would require a lightning in a bottle reception for two consecutive movies which would be yet another anomoly.

 

We shall see.

Three, if we count the Titanic - Avatar punch.

 

Which makes it harder, but shows he already repeat his absurd success once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ThomasNicole said:

Avatar had the biggest OW ever for December in 2009 and still have 10x multiplier, we can call that an anomaly as well. 

 

Of course the sequel will me more frontloaded, but there's nothing absurd in thinking it will double the first one OW and have half the legs to a similar total.

 

This is basically what I expect will happen. OW will be in the $140-170M range and legs will be 4-5x. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



5 hours ago, Borobudur said:

Avatar 2's leg will be heavily boosted by those who watch in 2D, coming back to see it in 3D. 

This sort of happened with the first one, but mostly because of a lack of 3D screens. I don't think that'll be an issue this time. Maybe for IMAX, but Avatar isn't going to hold onto those for long, whereas the original basically had free reign over all 3D screens for months.

1 hour ago, grim22 said:

Good point about Avatar popularity. It's broadly popular as a spectacle but not as a discussion piece. It's something people will show up for to experience it but they aren't going to start developing theories on how unobtainium works exactly

 

 

 

 

 

 

The original Top Gun had massive cultural impact, to the point that people who had never seen the movie would quote lines from it. That definitely helps Top Gun: Maverick. But I don't think TGM's cultural impact is very significant. It was a very 'safe' movie. In a way, the original Avatar was similarly 'safe'. 

 

Also, Avatar has an extensive lore, it's own language, essentially a pokedex of all the animals and stuff living there. I think that may have been a bit of a reason why it isn't popular with fanfic and such, because there isn't much left to build on, and the movies didn't have strong characters to build off of. 

 

I'm surprised there isn't more furry stuff, though.. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 hour ago, krla said:

This sort of happened with the first one, but mostly because of a lack of 3D screens. I don't think that'll be an issue this time. Maybe for IMAX, but Avatar isn't going to hold onto those for long, whereas the original basically had free reign over all 3D screens for months.

 

What movies are there to take imax screens from avatar?

No december movie is capable, and between jan-feb theres only 3

 

Babylon (wide 6/1), imax unconfirmed but if it happens it wont be a massive thing due to the type of movie this is

Titanic HFR re-release (10/2), will probably have imax,  doubt Cameron will allow it to stand in the way of a hypothetical record breaking run by avatar 2

Antman (17/2) it'll probably hit it hard, but  im sure disney would be willing to share if avatar 2 is in any sort of record breaking run

 

After that D&D on march 3, but if avatar 2 still making good money then itll probably take antmans imax screens, and avatar 2 on imax can thus continue being a significant thing till march 17 when the schedule starts to become pretty packed

 

is 55 days of imax supremacy,  + up to 35 of sharing, not "long"?

 

Edited by interiorgatordecorator
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 hours ago, ThomasNicole said:

Three, if we count the Titanic - Avatar punch.

 

Which makes it harder, but shows he already repeat his absurd success once.

Can you imagine if A2 beats the orig movie, and Cameron has the 'biggest movie of all time' 3 times in a row!.

He may think he's 'king of the world', but he's really king of movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CJohn said:

The 3rd act felt off to me. I just didn't get the point. I feel like Miller wanted to talk about the power of love but the landing failed to deliver. I really liked the stories of the genie tho.

The stuff after they leave the hotel is def weaker than the first two acts (which was 10/10 material for me). I'd recommend giving it another shot, knowing where it leads made me appreciate the set up and conclusion a lot more. Didn't feel as jarring, since it does take a sudden turn. But a very beautiful and touching film overall (great final shot). A bit clunky and oddly misshapen in the ways that only a master director could make when swinging for the fences.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Weekend Studio Estimates for September 23 - September 25, 2022


 

Rank Film Distributor Weekend Gross Locations Location
Average
%Change Total Gross TG ÷ OW Week
1 Don't Worry Darling Warner Bros. / New Line $19,200,000 4,113 $4,668 NEW $19,200,000 1.000 1
2 The Woman King Sony / TriStar $11,145,000 3,765 $2,960 -41.5% $36,298,724 1.905 2
3 Avatar (re-issue) Disney / 20th Century $10,000,000 1,860 $5,376 NEW $10,000,000 1.000 1
4 Barbarian Disney / 20th Century $4,800,000 2,890 $1,661 -26.2% $28,430,261 2.696 3
5 Pearl A24 $1,918,555 2,982 $643 -38.7% $6,651,256 2.126 2
6 See How They Run Disney / Searchlight $1,900,000 2,502 $759 -36.8% $6,105,039 2.030 2
7 Bullet Train Sony / Columbia $1,815,000 1,907 $952 -28.8% $99,247,954 3.305 8
8 DC League of Super-Pets Warner Bros. $1,765,000 2,351 $751 -19.0% $90,041,911 3.914 9
9 Top Gun: Maverick Paramount $1,559,847 2,025 $770 -30.4% $711,568,000 5.616 18
10 Minions: The Rise of Gru Universal $1,040,000 1,642 $633 -25.3% $365,547,230 3.416 13
11 The Invitation Sony / Screen Gems $1,000,000 1,676 $597 -43.4% $23,083,944 3.392 5
12 Moonage Daydream NEON $922,000 733 $1,258 -25.0% $2,600,526 2.114 2
                   
  Brahmastra Part One: Shiva Disney / Star Studios $415,000 460 $902 -62.3% $7,523,960 1.656 3
  Beast Universal $400,000 750 $533 -52.4% $31,451,800 2.717 6
  Where the Crawdads Sing Sony / Columbia $350,000 879 $398 -50.9% $89,577,551 5.192 11
  Cuando Sea Joven Pantelion $270,000 315 $857 NEW $270,000 1.000 1
  Running the Bases UP2U Films $235,000 697 $337 -56.4% $1,039,028 1.929 2
  Nope Universal $175,000 313 $559 -59.3% $123,113,710 2.775 10
  On the Come Up Paramount $150,000 603 $249 NEW $150,000 1.000 1
  Fall Lionsgate $120,000 167 $719 -6.5% $7,063,960 2.812 7
  Thor: Love and Thunder Disney $100,000 230 $435 -73.4% $343,152,809 2.380 12
  Confess, Fletch Paramount $84,235 242 $348 -68.4% $498,000 1.867 2
  The Silent Twins Focus $32,000 279 $115 -69.2% $185,655 1.788 2
  Bodies Bodies Bodies A24 $18,254 172 $106 -76.5% $11,394,824 3.505 8
  Marcel the Shell with Shoes On A24 $15,552 25 $622 -52.7% $6,306,640 7.213 14
  Everything Everywhere All At Once A24 $9,057 28 $323 -39.6% $69,993,467 11.313 27
Link to comment
Share on other sites





6 hours ago, babz06 said:

It’s very strange that there aren’t more films coming out this Christmas. I guess studios were scared of avatar and just gave up.

It's a combo of Avatar and also the production backlog that has resulted in each studio putting out a limited quantity of movies this year. But each studio will have at least one major movie out for Christmas: Avatar from Disney, Puss in Boots from Universal, I Wanna Dance with Somebody from Sony, Babylon from Paramount (though that's going to make most of its money in January when it opens everywhere). And that's probably all that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites











  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.