Jump to content

Shawn Robbins

Official Friday Est: I FRANK (2.82), RIDE (6.3), LONE (3.6), RYAN (2.6), HUSTLE (1.96), FROZEN (2.1)

By Shawn Robbins, in Numbers and Data

Recommended Posts

K1stpierre Global Phenomenon

K1stpierre

Posted
Posted

Yeah, Van Helsing had a solid marketing campaign and production value. I was excited and on top of that...it had a great hook. I WANTED it to be good. Big budget monster mash, he'll yeah. I still would like to see a good movie trading off that idea.This? Who asked for this? Modern day Frankenstein, cept, it has nothing to do with Frankenstein?Seriously, wtf?

When I first heard there was going to be a Frankenstein movie, I thought it was going to be based off of the book which I was excited for. Then, I see the trailer and I'm just like: wtf is this? Clearly I must have skipped a bunch of chapters :lol:

 

Van Helsing was a big dissapointment. I was pumped as the cast looked good, trailer looked good, only for it to just sink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




kowhite Global Phenomenon

kowhite

Posted
Posted

Van Helsing was a big dissapointment. I was pumped as the cast looked good, trailer looked good, only for it to just sink.

Van Helsing is a perfect example of what happens when you bring tons of money, tons of talented production and CG artists and let a director with the vision of an 8 year old lead.Stephen Sommers...you suck.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Mojoguy Global Phenomenon

Mojoguy

Posted
Posted (edited)

Van Helsing is a perfect example of what happens when you bring tons of money, tons of talented production and CG artists and let a director with the vision of an 8 year old lead.

Stephen Sommers...you suck.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Helsing_%28film%29

 

"In May 2012 Universal Pictures announced that they are rebooting the film with Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci as a two-year deal to produce a modern reimagining and Tom Cruise to star as the title character and also produce the film.[4]Rupert Sanders is in talks to direct the film.[5] Orci spoken to IGN that he has hinted that both The Mummy and Van Helsing reboots will have a Shared Universe. [6][7]"

 

The Van Helsing reboot will be another disaster. :ph34r:

Edited by Mojoguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
K1stpierre Global Phenomenon

K1stpierre

Posted
Posted

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Helsing_%28film%29

 

"In May 2012 Universal Pictures announced that they are rebooting the film with Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci as a two-year deal to produce a modern reimagining and Tom Cruise to star as the title character and also produce the film.[4]Rupert Sanders is in talks to direct the film.[5] Orci spoken to IGN that he has hinted that both The Mummy and Van Helsing reboots will have a Shared Universe. [6][7]"

 

The Van Helsing reboot will be another disaster. :ph34r:

Fuck. Me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites














MrPink Global Phenomenon

MrPink

Posted
Posted

Van Helsing is in the same realm of LXG in terms of incredible shittiness. One is about a mashup of movie monsters, the other is a mashup of literary heroes.

 

And they both have Richard Roxburgh.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Blankments Global Phenomenon

Blankments

Posted
Posted

I haven't seen Bruce Dern yet, but it would be a fucking shame if Chiwetel Ejiofor doesn't win the Oscar. Same for Michael Fassbender. 12 Years a Slave actually has pretty flawless performances from everyone. 

I honestly didn't see the appeal of Chiwetel's performance. I mean, he was alright but it's not like "HOLY SHIT, no one else could've owned that role like Chiwetel!"

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites






Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.

  I accept